Be careful not to confuse your experiences with all experiences. I'm truly sorry you had bad experience with growing up with religion; that doesn't make it a universal.
You are right. My experience is unique but the point I was trying to make is that all of us are products of our surroundings whether good or bad.
I'm really not sure how anyone can make the argument for a girl raped by a family member (let's say her father) to be force to carry to term and give birth to that child.
The argument would be that despite the evil that has happened to that girl, the child is innocent. Since life starts at conception, you can't murder the child for the sins of the father.
Genetically speaking though that child is screwed. It won't be normal. There's a good chance it will die young. That child reproducing is also bad for the gene pool.
However since we are talking religiously, well the bible has lots of incest in it, so I can see why it's justified. god says it's fine.
There's an awful lot of assumptions made there. Inbreeding isn't healthy, but it isn't a guaranteed death sentence either. There may be emerging genetic problems, there may not be.
I was also making an argument for a side, I personally wasn't saying that the woman should or shouldn't carry to term.
In any event I don't think as a matter of legally debate that anyone is going to say inbreeding or incest is good. Someone pro-life would say you're punishing a newly created individual for something they happened to them through circumstances outside their control.
I know what side of the argument you're on, don't worry.
I apologize if I sounded like you actually believed that, lol.
I thought a main reason why incest was illegal was because of the health factors.
I thought a main reason why incest was illegal was because of the health factors.
Probably a split between the cultural taboo and health related issues for sure. And you're right it does lead to a higher likelihood of genetic problems with the offspring. In any event, sexual abuse is a heinous crime, and it is especially bad when it is committed by a family member.
I don't think we're too far differing in opinions either, I was mostly just sticking to my guns for arguments sake.
This whole thing about punishing a teenager who gets knocked up by making her keep the baby and give birth, may seem good on paper. However from what I've seen in reality it doesn't work.
From experience all I've noticed is that not only does she not learn any lessons from it, but instead will keep getting knocked up by different guys in hopes that one of them will eventually support her *** and all those kids as well.
In the end all you're left with is a single mother with 5-6 children all from different fathers who collects welfare and food stamps.
Definitely no lesson learned and actually just digs herself deeper and deeper into a hole.
Note: Not representative of everyone, just what I've seen happen to all the teenagers who got pregnant in or just after high school.
oh ya. but what sevvy* said is a little vague by them "not having a chance". i think what he means is that those kids won't stand a chance of being normal decent people, as in they'll most likely have a trash upbringing and make the same mistakes as their parents.
oh ya. but what sevvy* said is a little vague by them "not having a chance". i think what he means is that those kids won't stand a chance of being normal decent people, as in they'll most likely have a trash upbringing and make the same mistakes as their parents.
Yes they do. Those moms are going to make loads off mtv and such. Reality TV is not reality.
eh they probably won't make as much as you think. one of the things that gives rise to all this reality tv is because it's cheap as hell to produce.
The people on the first 16 and pregnant shows made a significant amount of money. As the seasons went on, it dropped lower and lower due to the influx of people wanting to do the show.
I can't remember the source, and I'm too lazy to google. So no numbers right now.
I'll flat out say it - I'm pro-life. I'm proud to defend and support the legal rights of a cluster of undeveloped cells buried in a mass of flesh. The rationale of my stance is largely derived from a religious origin. As I do not regularly attend church, I have no way of explaining what the organized factions are currently championing as the basis of their argument; I can only explain that my position comes from careful spiritual contemplation and examination of the word of the Lord. I will continue to push for pro-life objectives by supporting proposed statutes that grant protection to unborn children (via letters and e-mails, however likely neglected, to my representatives). The overwhelming majority on the interwebs tends to lean rather far left, but I am certainly not alone outside of our digital corridors.
I apologize for leaving this thread for about a dozen pages .... but ... um, this post caught my eye.
Are you *really* going to step-up to the dish with the screen name "Logical" ... and spout-off about how you're Pro-life, and you're really not sure why you're Pro-life, but you're going to support Pro-life initiatives just for the f*ck of it, and no other tangible reason?
Where the hell is the "logic" in that? LoL
I think you should take a Mulligan, and go back to some more spiritual contemplation.
Otherwise, I wouldn't normally do this ... but you must be a big fat ...
Let's keep this civil. It's a wonder this thread made it to page 14 15, no reason to ruin it now.
oh come on krizz... wheres the fun in that?
A thread discussing whether or not its murder, combined with religious ppl and their beleifs.... its bound to go astray' lol
I haven't read all 16 pages yet but I'll contribute anyway. I am pro-choice. If women (and men) don't have the option to make the decision to abort legally, then they're just going to take a coat hanger to themselves, "fall" down a flight of stairs, take a punch to the stomach, whatever it takes. It's going to happen because people are stupid and will still have unprotected sex knowing they don't want or can't support a child. I have known a few girls like this who got pregnant numerous times at an early age because they couldn't be bothered to get on birth control and "guys don't like condoms". Stupid stupid stupid. While I don't condone women having multiple abortions just because they're careless, it's better than bringing an innocent life into the world and neglecting it, leaving it in a dumpster, or killing it after it's born when they realize it's too hard to take care of. It happens a lot more than I want to imagine, girls delivering in a McDonalds bathroom and leaving the baby in the toilet to die. Fathers who didn't want to be fathers smashing their babies into the wall out of frustration because they won't stop crying and killing them... it's a cruel world. Aborting in the earliest terms of pregnancy is perfectly okay to me if the parents are unfit or think it's best.
Yes they do. Those moms are going to make loads off mtv and such. Reality TV is not reality.
eh they probably won't make as much as you think. one of the things that gives rise to all this reality tv is because it's cheap as hell to produce.
The people on the first 16 and pregnant shows made a significant amount of money. As the seasons went on, it dropped lower and lower due to the influx of people wanting to do the show.
I can't remember the source, and I'm too lazy to google. So no numbers right now.
Amber from the first season made 60k. Source: she's from my hometown (sad to say) my wife waited on her numerous times blowing her money at her jewelry store. She now resides in jail where she has been for the last 2 mos.
Edit: Oh ya and she is broke again, the judge has ordered her to keep come up with 10k for her childs college fund, which she has yet to make happen. Local News paper & Another
Because people have abortions due to convenience.. Right.
Also, "life" isn't the debate. Personhood is. The cells are "alive" from before the sperm ever meets with the egg. The question is at what point of development do we determine protection rights. There is no soul, there is no fine line. It's just a subjective determination based on physical and cognitive development. Stop being dumb.
Not all are for convenience, only about 99%. You are the one being dumb. Apparently you don't understand or care about the complexities that define life, but boy you are ready to flush anything that doesn't meet your standards. Since when did you get a say on who is alive or not, or the existence of a soul? I know you feel smart, but feelings can be deceptive. Much, MUCH greater minds than yours come to differing conclusions. Proclamations such as yours show a misplaced faith in your own intelligence. In the absence of knowledge, I choose to err on the side of life.
I'm always amazed at the anti-choice's blind rage without any evidence to back up their argument beyond their own religious passions.
Why women have abortions:
1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest; 6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child, and 93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).
So 93% of them are not life threatening or rape/incest. However I'd hardly call that 93% as using abortion as "convenience" as you would put it. If you look at the income and religious makeup of abortions:
Who's having abortions (race)?
While white women obtain 60% of all abortions, their abortion rate is well below that of minority women. Black women are more than 3 times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are roughly 2 times as likely.
Who's having abortions (marital status)?
64.4% of all abortions are performed on never-married women; Married women account for 18.4% of all abortions and divorced women obtain 9.4%.
Who's having abortions (religion)?
Women identifying themselves as Protestants obtain 37.4% of all abortions in the U.S.; Catholic women account for 31.3%, Jewish women account for 1.3%, and women with no religious affiliation obtain 23.7% of all abortions. 18% of all abortions are performed on women who identify themselves as "Born-again/Evangelical".
Who's having abortions (income)?
Women with family incomes less than $15,000 obtain 28.7% of all abortions; Women with family incomes between $15,000 and $29,999 obtain 19.5%; Women with family incomes between $30,000 and $59,999 obtain 38.0%; Women with family incomes over $60,000 obtain 13.8%.
You can see that 87% of women having abortions consider themselves religious/christian (with 18% of those being "born again evangelicals").
87% of them are under 25.
75% are unmarried.
50% are at poverty level or just under 30k a year for their combined households.
So the majority of these "convenient" abortions are from women who are economically incapable of supporting their potential offspring and/or would be socially castrated if anyone found out. It's amazing that the religions that foster such a hatred towards the rights of women also contribute to the highest abortion rates via making it completely unacceptable to have a baby out of wedlock (oh and then telling their kids not to use condoms lol).
You want to know what the number one cause of abortion is in America? Religion.
But hey, let's make these poor women who will be socially destroyed for continuing the pregnancy and fiscally castrated by having to support the child, serve as incubation chambers for these clumps of cells, so they can grow up to be uneducated poverty stricken leeches on society. At least they'll most likely be religious too!
2. I actually do think I'm pretty smart. But then again all I have to back it up is several degrees, research, and analytical skills. But that doesn't really matter, because I provide you with links and data whenever I debate, so you don't even have to trust me!
The point is, that what I stated was 100% accurate: The debate is not where life begins, as life is a continuum. It's where personhood begins. It is illogical to assign personhood at the very moment that semen touches the egg. As a society we've determined personhood based on a myriad of development criteria, and made our standard around that scientific based decision.
Any decision earlier than that is made solely on religious principles and the idea that the fetus has a soul the moment sperm touches the egg. This is a nonsense argument. You cannot force your belief in god(s) onto the bodies of every woman in this country. You have no evidence to back up your claim, and have done nothing but wave your hands and act like a child in this thread. Trust me, the only absence of knowledge in this thread is your own.
And no, none of this was actually to you, as it's clear you're beyond any logical help. This was for anyone else reading that may not be intellectually challenged.
Also, I think it needs to be stressed so much more that you can be pro-choice and pro-life, but by touting around how abortions are evil and should be illegal most people come off as only one thing: anti-choice.
Yes they do. Those moms are going to make loads off mtv and such. Reality TV is not reality.
eh they probably won't make as much as you think. one of the things that gives rise to all this reality tv is because it's cheap as hell to produce.
The people on the first 16 and pregnant shows made a significant amount of money. As the seasons went on, it dropped lower and lower due to the influx of people wanting to do the show.
I can't remember the source, and I'm too lazy to google. So no numbers right now.
Amber from the first season made 60k. Source: she's from my hometown (sad to say) my wife waited on her numerous times blowing her money at her jewelry store. She now resides in jail where she has been for the last 2 mos.
Edit: Oh ya and she is broke again, the judge has ordered her to keep come up with 10k for her childs college fund, which she has yet to make happen. Local News paper & Another
i think the worst thing in here is that the judge thinks that 10k is going to get anywhere for college now lol. with how financial aid works, the kid is probably better off having nothing in a college fund.
Yes they do. Those moms are going to make loads off mtv and such. Reality TV is not reality.
eh they probably won't make as much as you think. one of the things that gives rise to all this reality tv is because it's cheap as hell to produce.
The people on the first 16 and pregnant shows made a significant amount of money. As the seasons went on, it dropped lower and lower due to the influx of people wanting to do the show.
I can't remember the source, and I'm too lazy to google. So no numbers right now.
Amber from the first season made 60k. Source: she's from my hometown (sad to say) my wife waited on her numerous times blowing her money at her jewelry store. She now resides in jail where she has been for the last 2 mos.
Edit: Oh ya and she is broke again, the judge has ordered her to keep come up with 10k for her childs college fund, which she has yet to make happen. Local News paper & Another
i think the worst thing in here is that the judge thinks that 10k is going to get anywhere for college now lol. with how financial aid works, the kid is probably better off having nothing in a college fund.
lol True that, but that pretty much sums up this town. :(
Adoption is a option. So yeah pro-life.(if the mother is to die over the child's birth guess what pro-choice.)
So you're stating that:
1. Life begins at conception and any mistake made that led to pregnancy (lack of education, poverty, lack of access, broken contraceptives) is just an "oh well" for the mother who should become an incubator for the clump of cells.
2. The 9 months of carrying the child and hours/days of birthing the child is just a "tough luck" for getting pregnant?
Interesting perspective. And it's not called pro-life, it's called "pro-poor-women-incubators", common mistake.
edit: Also, women have millions of eggs that "die before every getting the chance to breathe". If you want to talk about "potential life", we better to get fertilizing every egg possible to prevent the MASS GENOCIDE!!
I for one am up to the task of this mass impregnation. Whose first?
Adoption is a option. So yeah pro-life.(if the mother is to die over the child's birth guess what pro-choice.)
So you're stating that:
1. Life begins at conception and any mistake made that led to pregnancy (lack of education, poverty, lack of access, broken contraceptives) is just an "oh well" for the mother who should become an incubator for the clump of cells.
2. The 9 months of carrying the child and hours/days of birthing the child is just a "tough luck" for getting pregnant?
Interesting perspective. And it's not called pro-life, it's called "pro-poor-women-incubators", common mistake.
edit: Also, women have millions of eggs that "die before every getting the chance to breathe". If you want to talk about "potential life", we better to get fertilizing every egg possible to prevent the MASS GENOCIDE!!
I for one am up to the task of this mass impregnation. Whose first?
Honestly don't even think abortion should be a word. The fact that it became so common or used that they needed to give it a word is sorta sick to me.
If someone gets pregnant it is their fault(guy and girl) (unless raped) it is a very harsh thing to tell people what they can/can't do with their own bodies but what about the person inside the woman's belly? who is going to speak for them? (edit later busy)