New HTBF Shinryu 2.0 |
||
|
New HTBF Shinryu 2.0
mhomho said: » Carbuncle.Nynja said: » Twilight set was head/body only. cloak dagger ammo head THAT'S 4 pieces of known drops from the instance with the head mentioning a set detail so we can assume a body to go with it MAKING 5 PIECES OF LOOT WE KNOW OF. Not pieces of Twilight, pieces of loot from the instance. Carbuncle.Nynja said: » Oops, misread, too early in the day still. What sucks about fetters on this fight is this fool constantly draws in. If I had to guess three things added to this fight I’d say:
1. His auto attacks remain conal but get enfeebles 2. Fetters with doom or zombie aura of course 3. Gimmicks to change wing position His tp moves sucked to deal with at 90. Most everyone just brewed his *** once blue !! Was on and wings were out They'll make it like the seasonal events where to get the +1 version (in this case, the ilvl piece) you'll have to wear the earlier stuff during the fight. Gotta farm your Twilight before you can farm your Twilight +1
I'm obviously kidding Asura.Neojuggernautx said: » What sucks about fetters on this fight is this fool constantly draws in. If I had to guess three things added to this fight I’d say: 1. His auto attacks remain conal but get enfeebles 2. Fetters with doom or zombie aura of course 3. Gimmicks to change wing position His tp moves sucked to deal with at 90. Most everyone just brewed his *** once blue !! Was on and wings were out Fetters based on wing position. Fetters spawn on critical hit, blue proc required to despawn. Fetters don't spawn on person with the most enmity but on anyone who casts healing magic. Was this an official statement by the developers? Did they really refer to their designed mechanics as "annoying?"
[+]
Loose translation but more or less
They called mobs trash a few updates back too, the mask is cracking.
Tbf the dudes who have to sift through and fix the broken 20 year old code in this game probably hate it more than the players ever could
[+]
Fenrir.Velner said: » Was this an official statement by the developers? Did they really refer to their designed mechanics as "annoying?" That's probably FFXI mission statement. How can we annoy the players. I know lets put some mechanic where you got to use a Staff weaponskill but only at 15:00-18:00 in game ! Brilliant do it ! Grief tactics by devs are allowed, so they can make annoying fights. You KNOW that internally they have laughed at setting drop rates low or giving things cheap Doom/Death/Charm moves for the lulz. You KNOW.
However... already ready to put an alt with the low level Twilight set stylelocked outside of the battlefield entrance day one to receive checks-a-plenty.
[+]
Asura.Aeonova said: » Grief tactics by devs are allowed, so they can make annoying fights. You KNOW that internally they have laughed at setting drop rates low or giving things cheap Doom/Death/Charm moves for the lulz. You KNOW. However... already ready to put an alt with the low level Twilight set stylelocked outside of the battlefield entrance day one to receive checks-a-plenty. Everyone will know it’s a farce…but they can’t prove it! Has anybody thought that the new twilight armor could have auto-arise rather than reraise?
Hope they do the cape. Elemental Bonus +25% yes please.
[+]
Asura.Topace said: » Hope they do the cape. Elemental Bonus +25% yes please. Belt has major potential. 7ta 7haste?
Asura.Topace said: » Hope they do the cape. Elemental Bonus +25% yes please. so standard ambu nuke cape with weather bonus on top so I can toss like 3~5 ambu capes.
[+]
It'll be the same cape with 5macc and some int and mnd or something.
[+]
I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event.
Carbuncle.Nynja said: » I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event. That's why it's exactly what they WOULD do. It makes no sense. I don't think they will, just to be clear. But going against simple logic is what they always do. Nyame basically did this and nobody batted an eye. Actually welcomed it, because of inventory.
I don't put it past them to make something that invalidates all of our efforts thus far. Hell, people are talking about new Twilight belt being high triple attack, because Moonbow belt+1 (Sailfi+1 to lesser extent) doesn't even matter anymore. New is new Asura.Eiryl said: » Carbuncle.Nynja said: » I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event. That's why it's exactly what they WOULD do. It makes no sense. I don't think they will, just to be clear. But going against simple logic is what they always do. Would be the nicest thing they could possibly do to blm
[+]
Can't wait to get all these items....50 fights later I have 300 REM chapter 9s.
Asura.Nuance said: » Asura.Eiryl said: » Carbuncle.Nynja said: » I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event. That's why it's exactly what they WOULD do. It makes no sense. I don't think they will, just to be clear. But going against simple logic is what they always do. Would be the nicest thing they could possibly do to blm Augmented Aurist's Cape +1 says hi: https://www.bg-wiki.com/ffxi/Aurist's_Cape_+1 3 int/macc doesn't beat 20 mdamage and 10 mab
(it might be a functional replacement, but when have xi players even settled for less than best?)
[+]
Plenty of players settle for less than bis and cut corners in gearing, especially when it's your Nth job and your only using it for an adhoc event. Functional is fine, nobody would ever notice the difference. Admitting it publicly on these forums is where you've messed up.
[+]
Gotta have all this new gear to do the new content they have coming. Right around the corner...any second now keep waiting.
Lakshmi.Buukki said: » these forums is where you've messed up. Through me you pass into eternal pain: Through me among the people lost for aye. Justice the founder of my fabric moved: To rear me was the task of power divine, Supremest wisdom, and primeval love. Before me things create were none, save things Eternal, and eternal I shall endure. All hope abandon, ye who enter here. Carbuncle.Nynja said: » I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event. It makes less sense to release any back piece that doesnt invalidate some ambuscade back piece. Felgarr said: » Asura.Nuance said: » Asura.Eiryl said: » Carbuncle.Nynja said: » I cant imagine SE making an all-mage's cape that will invalidate a bunch of ambu capes, not while Ambu is still a primary event. That's why it's exactly what they WOULD do. It makes no sense. I don't think they will, just to be clear. But going against simple logic is what they always do. Would be the nicest thing they could possibly do to blm Augmented Aurist's Cape +1 says hi: https://www.bg-wiki.com/ffxi/Aurist's_Cape_+1 You should have mentioned augmented Fi Follet +1 with its fast cast, but you didnt. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
