Yea cuz k-12 is doing a bangup job.
Let's Start A Riot?!?! |
||
|
Let's start a riot?!?!
Cerberus.Hideka said: » We demand free college for the people of the state of Washington, due to the overwhelming effect that education has on economic success, and the correlated overwhelming impact of poverty on people of color, as a form of reparations for the treatment of Black people in this state and country. Yea cuz k-12 is doing a bangup job. Cerberus.Hideka said: » e demand a decentralized election process to give the citizens of Seattle a greater ability to select candidates for public office such that we are not forced to choose at the poll between equally undesirable options. There are multiple systems and policies in place which make it impractical at best for working-class people to run for public office, all of which must go, starting with any fees associated with applying to run for public office. every other demand i didnt comment on falls into one of five categories
1. Nonsensical 2. Racial 3. Tramples on civil liberties/freedoms 4. Ideological dreck and drivel 5. Sheer, unadulterated, unequivocal, Pure 100% *** retardation. ill give you a hint as to which category most of those items fell into. The real question is, have they declared themselves free from the laws and regulations of the US federal government? Are they declaring an open revolt? Better yet, are they attempting "to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion"? Cerberus.Hideka said: » i have to wonder at what point is trump going to have to invoke the insurrection act here with seattle? Whats going on in seattle plainly fits the description of insurrection, and regardless of what the governor says at that point about it- ultimately the fed can supercede him at this juncture. I have to surmise that hes decided to leave it alone so that people can see just how weak and ineffectual the democrats are at managing their cities? that or hes afraid the heavy handedness will hurt his re-election prospects; or both. Which i cant find fault in either of those lines of thought. Besides, it's their problem, we have local governments to handle this. If their "insurrection" spills out to another state, say Idaho, Idaho can handle from their end and then ask Federal assistance if they want to. I read that chanters were saying "Tax tax tax Amazon", (I did not read your long list, sorry, good work posting it, just I don't like to read stupid more than I have to), and my response to their Tax Amazon is "Let them" and hope that Amazon leaves. If I was in charge of Amazon or any corporation specifically targeted for unfair taxes, I'd leave to a place that would treat me and my business better. What's the City or State going to do? Write a Law Making it Illegal for them to move out??? Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » What's the City or State going to do? Write a Law Making it Illegal for them to move out??? Asura.Suteru said: » Paying billions of dollars in tax revenue to an already extraordinarily wealthy private entity to bribe them into coming to your neighborhood so they can hire people elsewhere and drive up rent so the current residents cannot afford to live in their own neighborhood isn't the answer either really. Asura.Suteru said: » Paying billions of dollars in tax revenue Also, this only affects the one property in question. This does not affect the corporation as a whole. And this is a 5-year, max $3 billion tax forgiveness. Meaning that Amazon had 5 years to claim up to $3 billion tax credit. If they take 2 years to claim the $3 billion, that means they start paying property taxes and state corporate taxes. If, after 5 years, they only claim $1 billion, they start paying property taxes and state corporate taxes in year 6. This neither gives out money, nor is a long-term tax break. And, since you are looking at an average of $250k/year for 25,000-40,000 new jobs, at 6.85% state tax rate and 3.876% city tax rate, you are looking at $26,815 per employee, on average, or $670,375,000 to $1,072,600,000 per year in additional tax revenue. And that is only for income taxes. That does not include any additional sales tax revenue associated with more people with money purchasing items in NYC. Or buying homes in NYC/NYS and paying property taxes on those properties. Or the new businesses that will grow because of increased demand and their state and corporate income taxes and the associated individual income taxes from those jobs that were created as offshoots due to increased demand. So, tell me, is it bad to give $3 billion in tax breaks to obtain $5.363 billion in new tax revenue over 5 years? And continuing ~$1 billion per year thereafter? Asura.Suteru said: » they can hire people elsewhere and drive up rent so the current residents cannot afford to live in their own neighborhood isn't the answer either really. Besides, having more money in the economy brings prosperity to everyone, including those who refuses to work for a living. Don't believe me? Go be poor in Europe right now, and see how bad it would be. Asura.Saevel said: » Yes; moresoever, they've armed themselves and have taken those city blocks hostage, and have issued a list of demands. So here is a picture they are trying to paint:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/10/white-house-stops-talking-about-coronavirus-309993 Like WTF is he supposed to do? Full on martial law? The left would love it. But they also love that they can make him out to be a bad guy not stopping corona, even though people are mass rioting and refusing to social distance. Damned if he do, damned if he don't. Personally still think he is a clown, but damn. Agreed. I think Maryland once tried with the Baltimore Colts.
im sorry but covid is over. The protests will have effectively installed herd immunity. We'll see a big spike as the protesters get bored and take it back home and kill their parents/grandparents with it, but after that itll be fine i guess.
We can thank the millions of morons out on the street protesting one of the most one sided issues that has ever come across america. BLM: "THIS COP DID SOMETHING BAD! WE WANT JUSTICE" The left: "YEAH The Center: "Totally 100% on board, justice mydudes" The Right: "Man thats ***. Were on board too" Nobody disagreed that the man should be prosecuted, and they were all arrested and charged within a day. its insanity that these protests have even persisted as long as they have. Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Agreed. I think Maryland once tried with the Baltimore Colts. Reminds me of current law making only backwards. They won't pass a reasonable and light bill until all the pork gets added in. Only then will the law be passed. With these guys the 'pork' will kill the 'movement.' Who teh *** do they think they are? Washington D.C.? Sheeeeet. I think one of the demands/reforms I can get behind is the abolition of No Knock Warrants. If I remember correctly, the No Knock Warrant discussed a few pages ago, the Police that went in, weren't wearing Police Markings and didn't have body cameras on. Looks like two thugs B&E into a place, claiming to be police, real Mafia like IMO.
Also going around on peoples property without Police identifying markers, etc., reminds me of Ruby Ridge a bit too much. I understand the reasoning behind No Knock Warrants, but IMO, its too dangerous for both parties. So, yea, law enforcement should have some of their hands tied. It's not an even fight, but quite frankly, they want to play by the same rules as the criminals, 'so we can actually stop the bad guys' buuut. Sorry just no, they have to be playing by rules, they have to be the institution that doesn't play dirty. They have to be. No knock warrants should be illegal as ***.
Reminds me of cop shoot outs in public. I watched that movie den of thieves the other day, and there was a scene where the cops are following the bad guys in cars after the heist. No shots are fired from either side until they end up in a traffic jam. So the cops in this movie are cornering a group of people that they know are armed to the teeth. Instead of backing off the cops decide they are going to get out of their vehicle and approach the bad guys. Only then do the robbers start firing. So naturally the cops do what cops do and start shooting back, in the middle of a traffic jam. And I am just thinking to myself as I watch this, this John Wayne ***just doesn't happen in real world scenarios. At least it isn't supposed to. If cops find themselves in an area that can create high collateral damage from a shoot out, they should back off and continue chase from a distance. Like with a helicopter. In the movie I am talking about, doesn't make a good story, but if the cops did not try to make the arrest on the middle of traffic, like 30-40 people in that scene would have been fine. So I am not sure where I am going with this, cops see way to many *** movies like that I think, and emulate the tough guy machismo of movie cops. Eh, anywho, that bugged me and I had to let it out somewhere haha. Wasn't there a UPS driver that was taken hostage in his van by criminals, and in the chase, they ran into a traffic jam and then had a shoot out with the police? I believe the UPS driver was killed in the fusillade. Terrible.
oh absolutely no-knocks need MASSIVE reforms. I disagree with their constitutionality wholesale. i understand the logic behind them, but that is untenable given a person has the innate right to defend their life and liberty, and theres no guarantee they are who they say they are.
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Wasn't there a UPS driver that was taken hostage in his van by criminals, and in the chase, they ran into a traffic jam and then had a shoot out with the police? I believe the UPS driver was killed in the fusillade. Terrible. Cerberus.Hideka said: » oh absolutely no-knocks need MASSIVE reforms. I disagree with their constitutionality wholesale. i understand the logic behind them, but that is untenable given a person has the innate right to defend their life and liberty, and theres no guarantee they are who they say they are. Aaaand I just realized the irony of this particular point. Abolish law enforcement, expect outlandish things like this to be enforced... By law... Am I reading too much into this?
Leviathan.Draugo said: » Aaaand I just realized the irony of this particular point. Abolish law enforcement, expect outlandish things like this to be enforced... By law... Am I reading too much into this? Wait.....WHY PAY FOR ANYTHING AT ALL??? Anyways....yah, I really can't see how disconnected the people pushing to Defund the Police are from keeping law and order too. Best answer was from that lady saying "Calling the police comes from a place of privilege" (paraphrased maybe) Like WTF? GTFO. Ya know, police/prison reform aside. These guys really don't know how well off they are within the U.S. borders.
As far as quality of life is concerned, opportunity, etc. I have been to places on this world that make even the roughest hoods in the U.S. look like Disney Land. Most of these people have never left their little comfort zones. Seriously people have no idea how well off they really are. I am not trying to down play the problems we have here. But dayumn if only they knew, maybe they wouldn't hate their own country as much. Ever seen a stray horse in the middle of urban traffic being zipped past by about 1000 rickshaws with no sense of traffic rules at all, meanwhile along the side of the street there are literal packs of homeless barely clothed children roaming around aimlessly, and 2-3 adults taking a crap right on the side walk all at once? I have, and that is mild compared to some of the things I have seen. Grass is always greener I suppose. Edit: and the most extreme places I have been to first hand, even still are mild compared to the really terrible places people live in. But it was enough for me to appreciate what the U.S. can potentially be, and on average is for most people. probably not super accurate because of all the variables involved. but a lot of today's social/justice issues remind me of this:
YouTube Video Placeholder worth the watch Cerberus.Hideka said: » Asura.Saevel said: » The real question is, have they declared themselves free from the laws and regulations of the US federal government? Are they declaring an open revolt? Better yet, are they attempting "to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion"? Yes; moresoever, they've armed themselves and have taken those city blocks hostage, and have issued a list of demands. The media are portraying these people as freedom fighters and worthy of respect. But if they are considered national heroes, does that make Ammon Bundy a national hero too? Cause he did the exact same thing as these "protesters" did.... Bad cops take a life, people try and bring attention to abuse via protesting, rioters and looter high jack the attention, other people decide that since there is rioting, they will 'over throw' the government and high jack the scene even further demanding free ***from a government they want dismantled, the original issue is drowned out by ***, eventually the 'rebels' go back to sipping their Starbucks and trolling the internet, nothing in the end is accomplished, besides billions of dollars in damage.
Reminds me of the Occupy slugs.
There's no real leader keeping the messaging on point, either. I guess that's one of the biggest differences between now and many civil rights movements of the past. Much of what is being broadcast is based on whatever is "trending", which unfortunately is a poor representation of any kind of intelligent thought process.
Anyone wanna start a pool on how many days before swat cleans out the rebellion?
Leviathan.Draugo said: » Anyone wanna start a pool on how many days before swat cleans out the rebellion? Was joke to be honest, swat going into all that would be the last thing that needs to happen, but it probably will eventually.
|
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||