Asura.Eiryl said: »
I can't be antifa and facist, make up your mind.
Let's Start A Riot?!?!
Let's start a riot?!?!
Its self evident that you have no clue what a fascist is. Btw your cast is the useful idiot, brown shirts if you like. They were the first ones to meet the gas chamber FYI.
[+]
It's literally in the word.
You can't be matter and anti-matter at the same time.
You can't be matter and anti-matter at the same time.
Asura.Eiryl said: »
I can't be antifa and facist, make up your mind.
That’s assuming Antifa is actually anti-fascist. Given how those idiots have operated thus far, I’m not convinced.
[+]
So here's how it works in your mind.
I am so fascist, that im against fascism but while being fascist that I'm so fascist I've come full circle to anti-fascist while being fascist.
I am so fascist, that im against fascism but while being fascist that I'm so fascist I've come full circle to anti-fascist while being fascist.
volkom said: »
you can be so far right, that you're actually left
Please do define it for us.
I'm not human, I'm antihuman, prove me wrong.
There several strategies you employ that are straight out of Hitler's play book.
First is claiming you know better than everyone else what is best for them.
Second is accusing others openly of your exact tactics, first to point the finger is the one who creates a common enemy for the apparatus to hate.
Third is an attempt to discredit their intelligence.
If that doesn't work, you will attempt to disparage character.
If that doesn't work, next is outright censorship. (Crying to the mods)
Last is just straight assassination. (Threatening bannings)
You have already stated countless times that people should be controlled down to the most efficient levels.
You have expressed disdain for any variety or competition.
You want to execute the 'incompetants.'
You also don't even adhere to given standards and claim profits illegitimately because you are more equal than others. (A major fascist trait)
Let's see I am sure there is plenty more.
But do tell how your thought processes aren't fascism.
I'm not human, I'm antihuman, prove me wrong.
There several strategies you employ that are straight out of Hitler's play book.
First is claiming you know better than everyone else what is best for them.
Second is accusing others openly of your exact tactics, first to point the finger is the one who creates a common enemy for the apparatus to hate.
Third is an attempt to discredit their intelligence.
If that doesn't work, you will attempt to disparage character.
If that doesn't work, next is outright censorship. (Crying to the mods)
Last is just straight assassination. (Threatening bannings)
You have already stated countless times that people should be controlled down to the most efficient levels.
You have expressed disdain for any variety or competition.
You want to execute the 'incompetants.'
You also don't even adhere to given standards and claim profits illegitimately because you are more equal than others. (A major fascist trait)
Let's see I am sure there is plenty more.
But do tell how your thought processes aren't fascism.
[+]
All of that is fully in your head.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
Asura.Eiryl said: »
All of that is fully in your head.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
[+]
Absolutely zero of it is fascist, much like you don't know the difference between libel and defamation. slander.
Yea I'm gonna practice my fascist rights and just block you now. It's very clear to me, I can't change your mind, and pretty much over reading your double speak and picking it apart for you.
What's new in the riot news? I hear covid is spiking, even in my town now, last few weeks have seen double the cases since they started/relaxed quarantine.
Seems like the perfect storm, these riots and the active virus.
What's new in the riot news? I hear covid is spiking, even in my town now, last few weeks have seen double the cases since they started/relaxed quarantine.
Seems like the perfect storm, these riots and the active virus.
[+]
That works for me, there's no point in your replies when you just make it up to fit what you want to say. (narrative, as it were)
Well, this got weird.
[+]
[+]
But that is just from a few observations, not saying that it happens 100%
So I may be wrong.
So I may be wrong.
I hate to break this to you, but no one is "tearing anyone apart" in any shape or form.
You're making your own storylines up and arguing with yourself.
The last thing I'm going to explain on fascism vs what I mention.
You have 100 people of all races on a boat. Fascists want to throw the blacks overboard because they're black.
I want to throw the 50 that are literally setting the boat on fire, overboard. Not because they're black, or brown, or Muslim, but because they're literally trying to bring the entire boat down.
This isn't an opinion, this isn't "I'm better than you" this isn't arbitrary. This is just logic.
You're making your own storylines up and arguing with yourself.
The last thing I'm going to explain on fascism vs what I mention.
You have 100 people of all races on a boat. Fascists want to throw the blacks overboard because they're black.
I want to throw the 50 that are literally setting the boat on fire, overboard. Not because they're black, or brown, or Muslim, but because they're literally trying to bring the entire boat down.
This isn't an opinion, this isn't "I'm better than you" this isn't arbitrary. This is just logic.
Except what you consider "literally setting the boat on fire" is going to differ wildly from one person to the next. But hey, go ahead and publish what constitutes a murderable offense "for the betterment of society". It'll fit quite nicely on the shelf at a library next to Mein Kampf.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Except what you consider "literally setting the boat on fire" is going to differ wildly from one person to the next. But hey, go ahead and publish what constitutes a murderable offense "for the betterment of society". It'll fit quite nicely on the shelf at a library next to Mein Kampf.
[+]
Most efficient use of books is to burn in order to heat your home.
[+]
It's really not. Betterment is betterment. Wholesale.
There is no opinion on what constitutes it. You can disagree, no one forces you to be correct.
There is no opinion on what constitutes it. You can disagree, no one forces you to be correct.
Asura.Eiryl said: »
It's really not. Betterment is betterment. Wholesale.
There is no opinion on what constitutes it. You can disagree, no one forces you to be correct.
There is no opinion on what constitutes it. You can disagree, no one forces you to be correct.
"Betterment" is an opinion, genius. And you'd be hard pressed to convince people that a society that is comfortable with the wholesale murder of "inferiors" is in any way "better" than what we have now. You'd think differently if they determined that it was you who deserved to have his head on the chopping block, Mr. Robespierre.
[+]
Sad part is he thinks he is clever and come up with all the answers all on his own. Delusional.
Stop feeding him.
Stop feeding him.
[+]
http://www.popten.net/2010/05/top-ten-most-evil-dictators-of-all-time-in-order-of-kill-count/
Maybe more Mao than Adolf.
Maybe more Mao than Adolf.
Quote:
His social programs the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution are two of the most ill-fated, poorly named, initiatives ever. The first was an effort to rapidly industrialize China. His focus was on making China a premier exporter of steel, and to this end he asked everybody to make it. The problem was it got many citizens to make smelting shops in their backyards. Not only was the steel of little value, but it was made from everything lying around the house including their own cooking supplies! Without the tools to make food, no money coming in from the steel, and no money to survive ~ a lot of people starved to death. The estimates on this program alone are 20 million deaths! Think about that number. Really think about it. Then ask yourself… why would you EVER let someone back into power after such an insanely bad decision.Well, they took the reigns away from him for a short time.
Hello BLM/ANTIFA tactics
In the interim Mao started the socialist education movement. He aimed the concept at young ones who would eventually wrest the power away from the older guard. By 1964 this movement was renamed the “four cleanups movement” whose goal was cleansing politics, economics, ideas, and organization of “reactionaries”. This led to the formation of the “Red Guards” who were organized to punish intellectuals and take out Mao’s political adversaries. The Cultural Revolution was now underway, and its overriding mission was to abolish: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas. Something Mao fervently believed in was that destruction and chaos could bring re-birth. So he told his followers to destroy buildings, sacred objects, talk back to ones elders, punish them, turn them in, and kill those who did not agree. By 1968 things were starting to look pretty good for Mao all over again, and so he put into place the decade long “Down to the Countryside Movement” which forced young intellectuals to move out to the country to become farmers. Sadly, the people he pushed out there were the same Red Guards who had helped him get power. Estimates of the death toll are between 40,000 – 7 million depending on who you ask.
Finally, there is the 100 flowers movement which just needs an abbreviated mention here. Mao asked people to come forth and tell him how he should govern China. Intellectuals and liberals bit at the chance to tell him what they really thought, and were encouraged by the Communist party to do so. Then in a sudden change of heart, or an incredibly crafty mission to out his haters, the government persecuted 500,000 of them who were considered to be “dangerous thinkers”.
Hello BLM/ANTIFA tactics
In the interim Mao started the socialist education movement. He aimed the concept at young ones who would eventually wrest the power away from the older guard. By 1964 this movement was renamed the “four cleanups movement” whose goal was cleansing politics, economics, ideas, and organization of “reactionaries”. This led to the formation of the “Red Guards” who were organized to punish intellectuals and take out Mao’s political adversaries. The Cultural Revolution was now underway, and its overriding mission was to abolish: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas. Something Mao fervently believed in was that destruction and chaos could bring re-birth. So he told his followers to destroy buildings, sacred objects, talk back to ones elders, punish them, turn them in, and kill those who did not agree. By 1968 things were starting to look pretty good for Mao all over again, and so he put into place the decade long “Down to the Countryside Movement” which forced young intellectuals to move out to the country to become farmers. Sadly, the people he pushed out there were the same Red Guards who had helped him get power. Estimates of the death toll are between 40,000 – 7 million depending on who you ask.
Finally, there is the 100 flowers movement which just needs an abbreviated mention here. Mao asked people to come forth and tell him how he should govern China. Intellectuals and liberals bit at the chance to tell him what they really thought, and were encouraged by the Communist party to do so. Then in a sudden change of heart, or an incredibly crafty mission to out his haters, the government persecuted 500,000 of them who were considered to be “dangerous thinkers”.
[+]
alright look this is gonna be dark so I'll spoiler it.
Do not fear the trains will run on time!
Phoenix.Thorbean said: »
The Cultural Revolution was now underway, and its overriding mission was to abolish: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas.
We are here now. Quickest way to forget history. Doomed to repeat yada yada.
[+]
I didn't think I had to put "no espousing eugenics" in the forum rules, but that's why it's a living document I guess
[+]
Asura.Eiryl said: »
It's not the worst thing that could happen. It wouldn't take complete eradication. We could lose a few billion and come out ahead. Plus selective castration/breeding, advance the species etc
If monkeys were to design a super monkey they would never come up with homo sap.
Asura.Eiryl said: »
It's literally in the word.
You can't be matter and anti-matter at the same time.
You can't be matter and anti-matter at the same time.
Terlet Sangria said: »
Well, this got weird.
"The only thing we learn from the study of history is that we learn nothing from history." - Intro to history 101.
[+]
Rooks said: »
I didn't think I had to put "no espousing eugenics" in the forum rules, but that's why it's a living document I guess
Leviathan.Draugo said: »
the A word
Aardvarks are cryptofascists, that's been a settled debate for a while now
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.