That Impeachment Thing....

Langues: JP EN DE FR
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » That impeachment thing....
That impeachment thing....
First Page 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 60 61 62
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:09:21
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:11:34
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:13:11
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:19:02
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 14:22:10
Link | Citer | R
 
kireek said: »
Viciouss said: »
Is that a result of Macron shutting down Trump during his failed NATO trip? If so, well, I can live without french fries.

You mean where a large amount of captured ISIS fighters are French citizens and France refuses to take them back so Trump was shaming him and he changed the subject?

Turns out, that wasn't true at all. Not even a small amount of ISIS fighters were French citizens, much less a large amount. Trump just made it up, like he does everything else.

Also, Trump did cancel his afternoon press conference, because they were very clearly mocking his first one. His feelings got hurt so he is running out of there.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:28:36
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 14:42:07
Link | Citer | R
 
We are used to this kind of incomplete information. How many currently captured ISIS fighters are from France? Your wiki provides no information on that topic. Remember, according to you, France has only identified 689 French fighters in the entire army, out of how many hundred thousand? So if only 1-2% of the entire army comes from France, why should we believe there are a large amount of French fighters currently among the captured?
Offline
By clearlyamule 2019-12-04 14:56:07
Link | Citer | R
 
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Viciouss said: »
Not the way that the fearmongerers want us to believe. There have been no consequences for the public as a result of this very legitimate inquiry.

French fries shortage.
Whatever we will always have our freedom fries!
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 14:58:25
Link | Citer | R
 
clearlyamule said: »
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Viciouss said: »
Not the way that the fearmongerers want us to believe. There have been no consequences for the public as a result of this very legitimate inquiry.

French fries shortage.
Whatever we will always have our freedom fries!

If we can't have French fries all is lost...200 plus years of a country down the drain.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 14:59:43
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 15:00:20
Link | Citer | R
 
Remember Patrick Henry...give me french fries or give me death !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 15:03:47
Link | Citer | R
 
I'm used to pointless bickering bordering on incoherent nonsense but then again I'm also used to FFXIAH !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 15:28:12
Link | Citer | R
 
DirectX said: »
If America left NATO then Poland, Latvia and Lithuania would be pissing themselves and expecting the EU to gear up defenses, and when they didn't bother they would start talking about leaving. They'd be better off with a USA and UK alliance than expecting white flag France and Germany to defend them anyway. Germany buys fuel from Russia and indirectly finances all the problematic things they claim to oppose. It's a joke really.

Yeah thats not gonna happen, just because every European trip Trump takes goes the exact same way (cries about spending, cries about being laughed at) doesn't mean the USA is gonna abandon NATO.
Offline
Posts: 557
By Eboneezer 2019-12-04 15:39:09
Link | Citer | R
 
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Let's be real here, if Obama did what Trump did, the GOP would scream treason and push for having him hung.

Well, there's
kireek said: »
They are accusing Trump of doing what Biden actually did do from his own admittance.

The difference is that Obama appointed Biden to Ukraine, followed by a prosecutor getting fired that was investigating Burisma. Biden is on video admitting that he told the Ukraine that he was specifically holding up aid to get this investigator fired. In his threat of holding the aid, he specifically mentioned that he had the backing of the president in this, and that he would call him if they wanted to verify. We have the VP admitting the POTUS was part of the quid. Can you imagine if the situations were reversed? If Pence bragged about doing this on tv, can you honestly say that you, Vic, Oz, and the left would be dismissing it so quickly as being "debunked because he was just trying to take too much credit?" That's been the claim so far.

Move forward to Trump. There is no video evidence of anything. There's an allegation about a phone call from an unknown whistle blower. The transcript of the call has been released and refutes the whistle blower's claim. No one has disputed the substance of the transcript, only minute details which were A) Trump mentioned Biden being on video talking about corruption and B) Zelensky specifically mentioned Burisma. There have been no witnesses that have testified that Trump, nor anyone of authority, ever told them aid or a meeting was being held to force the Ukraine into making a public investigation announcement. The only witnesses thus far, have testified that they assumed that was the policy and that their assumptions weren't based on Trump, or anyone of authority, making the demand or even mentioning it.

Why did the 2nd situation blow up into this big ordeal, and the first one didn't? The first one had a witness, the VP at that, that actually claimed the POTUS instructed him to do it. Their threat actually accomplished their goal. The Trump situation has a transcript that refutes the claim, and witnesses that say they were never told that there was any kind of quid. Both direct parties say it didn't happen. The only ones making the claim have admitted that they were assuming things based on their own feelings and not based on any instruction. There is direct evidence in the first situation of a quid. There is evidence to the contrary of a quid in the 2nd.

And here we are.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 15:48:11
Link | Citer | R
 
There is evidence that the Democrats are full of ***. Mostly cause they haven't stopped bitching about Trump since 2016. And there is no signs of it stopping.

Instead of blaming Trump they should be working on why us not Trump.

Defeating an incumbent is not easy. And they are crashing and burning.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 15:52:18
Link | Citer | R
 
Eboneezer said: »
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Let's be real here, if Obama did what Trump did, the GOP would scream treason and push for having him hung.

Well, there's
kireek said: »
They are accusing Trump of doing what Biden actually did do from his own admittance.

The difference is that Obama appointed Biden to Ukraine, followed by a prosecutor getting fired that was investigating Burisma. Biden is on video admitting that he told the Ukraine that he was specifically holding up aid to get this investigator fired. In his threat of holding the aid, he specifically mentioned that he had the backing of the president in this, and that he would call him if they wanted to verify. We have the VP admitting the POTUS was part of the quid. Can you imagine if the situations were reversed? If Pence bragged about doing this on tv, can you honestly say that you, Vic, Oz, and the left would be dismissing it so quickly as being "debunked because he was just trying to take too much credit?" That's been the claim so far.

Move forward to Trump. There is no video evidence of anything. There's an allegation about a phone call from an unknown whistle blower. The transcript of the call has been released and refutes the whistle blower's claim. No one has disputed the substance of the transcript, only minute details which were A) Trump mentioned Biden being on video talking about corruption and B) Zelensky specifically mentioned Burisma. There have been no witnesses that have testified that Trump, nor anyone of authority, ever told them aid or a meeting was being held to force the Ukraine into making a public investigation announcement. The only witnesses thus far, have testified that they assumed that was the policy and that their assumptions weren't based on Trump, or anyone of authority, making the demand or even mentioning it.

Why did the 2nd situation blow up into this big ordeal, and the first one didn't? The first one had a witness, the VP at that, that actually claimed the POTUS instructed him to do it. Their threat actually accomplished their goal. The Trump situation has a transcript that refutes the claim, and witnesses that say they were never told that there was any kind of quid. Both direct parties say it didn't happen. The only ones making the claim have admitted that they were assuming things based on their own feelings and not based on any instruction. There is direct evidence in the first situation of a quid. There is evidence to the contrary of a quid in the 2nd.

And here we are.

They have planned this impeachment since Nov 2016. This wasn't just because of a phone call. They were dying to impeach Trump 3 years ago.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 16:04:46
Link | Citer | R
 
fonewear said: »
They have planned this impeachment since Nov 2016. This wasn't just because of a phone call. They were dying to impeach Trump 3 years ago.

Yeah, it was sure nice of him to hand us a clear abuse of power to impeach his *** on. Just think, we haven't even gotten to his myriad of financial crimes. Thats next year!
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 16:05:08
Link | Citer | R
 
fonewear said: »
There is evidence that the Democrats are full of ***. Mostly cause they haven't stopped bitching about Trump since 2016. And there is no signs of it stopping.

Instead of blaming Trump they should be working on why us not Trump.

Defeating an incumbent is not easy. And they are crashing and burning.

So much this. The Independents have switched course and now oppose impeachment with a growing majority. You would think that the Democrats would take note of this and look for the nearest exit, but instead they're all like:

[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 16:07:01
Link | Citer | R
 
Viciouss said: »
fonewear said: »
They have planned this impeachment since Nov 2016. This wasn't just because of a phone call. They were dying to impeach Trump 3 years ago.

Yeah, it was sure nice of him to hand us a clear abuse of power to impeach his *** on. Just think, we haven't even gotten to his myriad of financial crimes. Thats next year!

Just make sure you have something planned for 2021-2024.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 16:28:55
Link | Citer | R
 
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2019-12-04 16:32:29
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 16:34:08
Link | Citer | R
 
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

So, the 2016 gameplan.
[+]
 Odin.Slore
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Slore
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2019-12-04 16:40:05
Link | Citer | R
 
Yeah cause that plan worked great.
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 16:47:23
Link | Citer | R
 
DirectX said: »
Don't the Trump fans at least in part want him to be impeached just for the rioting and potential civil war?

This is why I voted Brexit anyway.

That would be fun, but it would be funnier if Trump gets removed from office early into his second term, and then Pence finishes out and wins reelection twice in the ultimate backfire.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 16:47:23
Link | Citer | R
 
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

So, the 2016 gameplan.

*2018
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 16:49:43
Link | Citer | R
 
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

So, the 2016 gameplan.

*2018

You do know how midterm elections work, right? Because you're basically adopting the same mindset as a 2012 Republican, and they had a better midterm.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17757
By Viciouss 2019-12-04 16:57:31
Link | Citer | R
 
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

So, the 2016 gameplan.

*2018

You do know how midterm elections work, right? Because you're basically adopting the same mindset as a 2012 Republican, and they had a better midterm.

Yeah, I do. I also know how Pennslyvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin have gone even further to the left since 2016, and with no blue states going even remotely closer to the right, Trump can't win without those 3 states. He just squeaked by the EC in 2016 by about 100,000 votes. Thats not gonna happen again.
 Odin.Slore
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Slore
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2019-12-04 17:05:12
Link | Citer | R
 
You said that same thing in 2016 Vic... but let me guess this time you mean it?
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-12-04 17:08:44
Link | Citer | R
 
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

So, the 2016 gameplan.

*2018

You do know how midterm elections work, right? Because you're basically adopting the same mindset as a 2012 Republican, and they had a better midterm.

Yeah, I do. I also know how Pennslyvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin have gone even further to the left since 2016, and with no blue states going even remotely closer to the right, Trump can't win without those 3 states. He just squeaked by the EC in 2016 by about 100,000 votes. Thats not gonna happen again.

Except the RCP state polls have Trump up in Wisconsin, competitive in Michigan (beating Warren by 4, losing to Biden by 1), and back-and-forth in Pennsylvania.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2019-12-04 17:10:09
Link | Citer | R
 
Viciouss said: »
Oh we have that covered, beat Trump in '20. No problem.

If we listened to people like you we would never have any progress. Probably still using stones to start fire.
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 60 61 62
Log in to post.