First Official GOP President Announcement

How?! Cloning vats?

It is estimated by the year 2020 nearly 40% of the world's population will be gay or on drugs !

The religious freedom law says the government cannot intrude on a person's religious liberty unless it can prove a compelling interest in imposing that burden and do so in the least restrictive way.

And, yes, that leaves room for interpretation. So what the law could actually accomplish, experts agree, will have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, probably in court.

vs

This law reinstated the Sherbert Test, which was set forth by Sherbert v. Verner, and Wisconsin v. Yoder, mandating that strict scrutiny be used when determining whether the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guaranteeing religious freedom, has been violated.

I don't see that much of a difference in the 'spirit' of the bolded sections. Both basically say that the burden is on the courts to prove that there is not a legitimate, compelling reason to infringe on the religious liberities

Well we already created artificial sperm. So the use for men is only to open pickle jars !

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/scientists-create-artificial-human-eggs-and-sperm/#postComments

Why not both?

Ramyrez is a Bill Clinton hater!!

The sperm isn't the issue. Need an artificial egg and uterus for it to grow.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/scientists-create-artificial-human-eggs-and-sperm/#postComments

...yes?

Have you seen me say I actually like the man, ever?

I enjoyed the years of his presidency, but they had little to do with him directly.

He's a terrible human being, and so is his wife.

But I'm glad that's all you took away from my comment.

*sigh*

lololol no idea who kawar is , nor am i interested. I just don't care enough to deal with haters^^

After all, it must be known religion has no place in a civilized civilization.

Let me explain why I am an idiot on this topic. Group A(in this case lgbt) says "Cater my wedding, Make my wedding outfits, design a cake for my wedding' Group B (in this case evangelists) says " No, you are more than welcome to buy a pre made cake, or one from my album, but I will not make a custom cake for that purpose"

Now, Group A is offended(ironically Group B is offended were it to be reversed) and they then proceed down the Worst road possible.. they take it to court.

My thing is there are better ways without getting the courts involved.
1:Post a negative review
2: go somewhere else
3: tell you friends not to go there

any of these things are ok.. taking it to court isnt

They are a private business.. not a government entitiy, not a corporation

We don't serve blacks at this counter.

Forget it. They're just going to try to mock the argument stating that you're overreacting and that it's not the same at all.

This ***is so important it needs two threads !

Apparently so.

troll.....

We(hopefully) have come to understand that the context you just used is wrong.

Noone is saying they will not SERVE(i.e. sell things) to lgbt.. its that they will not do lgbt ceremonies.

Anyway. last post and I hopefully will not be posting anymore..

Bottomline: This entire thing is about 1 'group's' 'rights' vs a 2nd 'group's' 'rights'

when 1 group gets there way the other gets infringed. It works going A vs B, and also B vs A

Religious rights aren't being infringed upon. You can go away now.

lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol

At least we can agree on this!

Wow....


I stand corrected!

It's a direct response to this:

I will forever cherish the time someone told me that it's not "ok" to take something to court.

It's a good thing we have a constitutionalist to remind us of those things.

You make me want to MS PAINT!

That's the most romantic thing anyone has ever told me.

MS Paint me like one of your French girls.

Walker's going to announce his campaign April 7th I think. Or was it someone else?

Anyway someone is announcing something on the 7th.

Thought that was Paul, but I could be wrong.

We're both wrong. I looked. It's Marco Rubio announcing on the 7th.

Oh wait Rand Paul too. Should be fun. So I was wrong, unless Walker is going to as well with the rest of them. Idk, lol. More announcements soon.

Back on topic:

Of Course Ted Cruz Could Win
The National Review

Opening:

I don't much care for their politics, but I like their style.

But then there is his attendance problem....

Cruz MIA at Armed Services hearings
Politico

It goes on....