NIN TP Set/s |
||
|
NIN TP set/s
Ragnarok.Anye said: » Do I really have to stalk you guys every day and keep you guys in line? It's well within your abilities to correct someone without resorting to blatant insults. "Wrong" is not an insult. It as in observation and it is far more *** annoying to have false information spread because someone thinks they're right.
[+]
Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Ragnarok.Anye said: » Do I really have to stalk you guys every day and keep you guys in line? It's well within your abilities to correct someone without resorting to blatant insults. "Wrong" is not an insult. It as in observation and it is far more *** annoying to have false information spread because someone thinks they're right.
[+]
Beats having to say it in 104 posts. It's still not an insult.
And I'd say calling my math wrong without even attempting to prove it is pretty *** insulting too. I guarantee if Nightfyre posted the same math, dude wouldn't have said anything.
Ragnarok.Anye said: » you can easily prove your point once and be done with it without resorting to insults. Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Beats having to say it in 104 posts. It's still not an insult. Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. The real insult is to the NIN job as a whole. He claimed to have accuracy problems on DCs.
Melee BLMs are capping accuracy on DCs :( Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. Because people see "information" that they believe to be useful and follow the "advice" to construct their TP sets and subsequently inform others of their "knowledge" and then we have hundred of Kaerins circulating. Unless, of course, it is clarified that they actually aren't making a valid point. Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. And now they have nothing. Oops, accidently looked at this thread and posted in it again. =[ I've also argued against Nightfrye before. And how you can all fight DCs and not cap crit rate is just sad. I pity you. EDIT: Reading comprehension is good too, I said if you can't easily cap crit rate, you should be adding accuracy because it will most likely not be capped as well. Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. Because people see "information" that they believe to be useful and follow the "advice" to construct their TP sets and subsequently inform others of their "knowledge" and then we have hundred of Kaerins circulating. Unless, of course, it is clarified that they actually aren't making a valid point. Kaerin said: » Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. And now they have nothing. Oops, accidently looked at this thread and posted in it again. =[ I've also argued against Nightfrye before. And how you can all fight DCs and not cap crit rate is just sad. I pity you. So you cap dDEX on VW mobs? Doubt it. Guess you don't cap acc either, sucks to be you.
Ramuh.Austar said: » Kaerin said: » Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. And now they have nothing. Oops, accidently looked at this thread and posted in it again. =[ I've also argued against Nightfrye before. And how you can all fight DCs and not cap crit rate is just sad. I pity you. Better is better. Also, you're carrying around byakkos already anyway, why make and carry around AF2+2 when theyre inferior? Kaerin said: » Ramuh.Austar said: » Kaerin said: » Ragnarok.Anye said: » Fenrir.Jinjo said: » Except the point was proven, and has been previously proven. Yet, they still won't accept the simple fact that they are not correct. And now they have nothing. Oops, accidently looked at this thread and posted in it again. =[ I've also argued against Nightfrye before. And how you can all fight DCs and not cap crit rate is just sad. I pity you. Better is better. Because they're not inferior 99.9% of the time.
Ramuh.Austar said: » Because they're not inferior 99.9% of the time. As far as NIN being a relevant DD, it pretty much ends at dynamis. Koga pants set is going to be better regardless in dynamis, and you have the ability to use shinobi ring with ease. You still won't be capping ddex on DC mobs, and you won't have accuracy issues.
[+]
Phoenix.Dramatica said: » As far as NIN being a relevant DD, it pretty much ends at dynamis. Koga pants set is going to be better regardless in dynamis, and you have the ability to use shinobi ring with ease. You still won't be capping ddex on DC mobs, and you won't have accuracy issues. This set easily trumps your AF2+2 leg set and is most likely the best possible without marches. This set with AF1+1 body sometimes caps my crit rate on poopy lame stuff like dynamis, and this actual set listed with AF3+2 body always has. You need ~142 DEX (on average) to cap Crit Rate vs. DCs in Dynamis. It obviously varies from mob to mob, but the average AGI is 92.
I happily await a set that beats a capped haste koga pants set, good luck.
I'd also like to point out that I didn't just make that number up. But, since we're not proving things, I won't.
I'm right 0.01% of the time, therefor I'm right all of the time.
[+]
If you use shinobi, ninja chainmail would still beat Thaumas.
And your set with iga would still be behind your set with chainmail. Ramuh.Austar said: » If you use shinobi, ninja chainmail would still beat Thaumas. 5% DW beats 12 accuracy 3% QA 3% TA 3% DA 5 STR and 5STP? Maybe if the 5% DW caps your delay reduction it stands a chance, but not with just haste. Ramuh.Austar said: » And your set with iga would still be behind your set with chainmail. Except for that whole little thing where if AF1+1 body isn't capping my crit rate, 99% of the time I also need to equip the AF3+2 body to cap my acc. If most of the AF3+2 body is having an effect on damage output, it is better then AF1+1. We're talking dynamis mobs, I'm sorry you're having such a hard time capping acc.
And yes, 5% DW would if you don't need the accuracy. Quote: Except for that whole little thing where if AF1+1 body isn't capping my crit rate, 99% of the time I also need to equip the AF3+2 body to cap my acc. If you're not capping Acc on DCs in Dynamis, then you don't have capped Katana skill. I don't care what your dDEX is. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
