http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/saudi-arabia-sorcery-death-sentence-upheld-2010-03-18
Do why religion make think bad people?
Saudi Arabia News |
||
Saudi Arabia News
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/saudi-arabia-sorcery-death-sentence-upheld-2010-03-18
Do why religion make think bad people? Valefor.Slipispsycho
Offline
Because it makes them think that by punishing someone else for their sins, that it somehow absolves them of their own. At least, that's how it seems anyways.
Trebold said: Do why religion make think bad people? No DRG for party, camp spot site with 30 dmg, but is it for 20 like 30 dmg when you no hit be it for dd, for 30 dmg instead? or half is 10 for 20 dmg? Ragnarok.Blindphleb said: Trebold said: Do why religion make think bad people? No DRG for party, camp spot site with 30 dmg, but is it for 20 like 30 dmg when you no hit be it for dd, for 30 dmg instead? or half is 10 for 20 dmg? lmfao, I love broken language. :D
Where'd the 'DRG for party' one come from? Wasn't that a legitimate post on here at one time? Trebold said: lmfao, I love broken language. :D Where'd the 'DRG for party' one come from? Wasn't that a legitimate post on here at one time? It is from Allakhazam Trebold said: Do why religion make think bad people? oh wow xD where do you find those pics? lol
Necro Bump Detected!
[41 days between previous and next post]
Quetzalcoatl.Sectumsempra
Offline
Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Before you pull up Hiroshima/Nagasaki, maybe you should do some research. After looking at every angle I could think of and writing several papers on it, myself and most of my peers were forced to determine that despite being horrific, ultimately it was the best option for both sides of the story. Quetzalcoatl.Sectumsempra said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Before you pull up Hiroshima/Nagasaki, maybe you should do some research. After looking at every angle I could think of and writing several papers on it, myself and most of my peers were forced to determine that despite being horrific, ultimately it was the best option for both sides of the story. You are right, and I can use what you are saying exactly for the first link posted in this topic. Hence why we have the lowest crime rate in the world, believe it or not. Sylph.Beelshamen
Offline
Quetzalcoatl.Sectumsempra said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Before you pull up Hiroshima/Nagasaki, maybe you should do some research. After looking at every angle I could think of and writing several papers on it, myself and most of my peers were forced to determine that despite being horrific, ultimately it was the best option for both sides of the story. Yes, after looking at it from every angle you decided that the bombings 65 years ago was the best option for both sides. You really have no idea how absurdly arrogant you sound, do you? oh, this thread again.
Yep two countries at war with one another is EXACTLY the same as killing a man because you think he's a witch.
20 more pages of ***, here they come!
Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Quetzalcoatl.Sectumsempra said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Before you pull up Hiroshima/Nagasaki, maybe you should do some research. After looking at every angle I could think of and writing several papers on it, myself and most of my peers were forced to determine that despite being horrific, ultimately it was the best option for both sides of the story. You are right, and I can use what you are saying exactly for the first link posted in this topic. Hence why we have the lowest crime rate in the world, believe it or not. The morality of the bombing of Hiroshima wouldn't make the first story any more or less moral. I think most of us can see it as an apples and oranges situation, i.e., it's not a useful comparison. The reason why people are (were?) flipping out about it is because the man in question didn't do anything remotely deserving of death. Maybe he was a trickster and a fraud if he was getting people to believe in magic, but I should point out that nobody should get executed for practicing sorcery since magic doesn't *** exist. As for the claim that you have the lowest crime rate in the world, I can't find a source that backs that up. Saudi Arabia does have a low murder rate (though I would argue that executing someone for sorcery counts as murder), but I've seen sources that put Yemen and Switzerland at lower rates (not counting Vatican City). And if you have a low crime rate because you execute every Joe and Jane who sneezes too loud, then I wouldn't be too smug about it. Sylph.Maruraba said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Quetzalcoatl.Sectumsempra said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Before you pull up Hiroshima/Nagasaki, maybe you should do some research. After looking at every angle I could think of and writing several papers on it, myself and most of my peers were forced to determine that despite being horrific, ultimately it was the best option for both sides of the story. You are right, and I can use what you are saying exactly for the first link posted in this topic. Hence why we have the lowest crime rate in the world, believe it or not. The morality of the bombing of Hiroshima wouldn't make the first story any more or less moral. I think most of us can see it as an apples and oranges situation, i.e., it's not a useful comparison. The reason why people are (were?) flipping out about it is because the man in question didn't do anything remotely deserving of death. Maybe he was a trickster and a fraud if he was getting people to believe in magic, but I should point out that nobody should get executed for practicing sorcery since magic doesn't *** exist. As for the claim that you have the lowest crime rate in the world, I can't find a source that backs that up. Saudi Arabia does have a low murder rate (though I would argue that executing someone for sorcery counts as murder), but I've seen sources that put Yemen and Switzerland at lower rates (not counting Vatican City). And if you have a low crime rate because you execute every Joe and Jane who sneezes too loud, then I wouldn't be too smug about it. As ignorant as you are, maybe it's time to enlighten you about what's happening in the world, first of all "America" is not the whole globe, if you don't know that yet. 1. Your country has been living off the world's resources (mainly ours). 2. Your country is killing (and supporting) the killing of millions of people through out the world. 3. Your citizens are the most ignorant people on earth, because your government want you to be like that. (hence why they invented Fox, Sky, etc.) Before you tell me that bringing Hiroshima in the discussion is not useful, you are making a big deal about killing a witch or w/e, where your "Satanic government" is killing people everywhere (and even your own soldiers). And the bigger problem is that you are DEFENDING THE DECISION OF THE NUCLEAR BOMB! Just how ignorant can you be. Forgot to reply on your other silly point, yes we have a very low crime rate, and I'm not doing the research for your highness.
Valefor.Endlesspath
Offline
The reality of all of this is proven history ~ right or wrong the strongest are the masters of their domain, to use and do as they see fit. This is the cold hard fact of humanity. There will always be the weak; and empires will always fall, to give way to the next strongest empire. Some nation/country/alliance/kingdom/whatever will always be at the top of the "food chain", like it or not, right or wrong.
To see why (for now at least) we're at the top of the food chain - here's a few youtubes of brutal reality regarding technology and its advantages: Lastly.. for the dreamers: Avatar is a movie - nothing more, pure entertainment for the emotions. Do I wish we'd "all get along"? sure. Do I wish we'd all we'd no longer have wars and everyone would have peace? sure. Unfortunately I have to deal with reality. Life's a *** and then you die. Ragnarok.Blindphleb said: Yep two countries at war with one another is EXACTLY the same as killing a man because you think he's a witch. QFT Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Forgot to reply on your other silly point, yes we have a very low crime rate, and I'm not doing the research for your highness. What I don't get is that in the US, if people started putting "witches" to death or started killing people who left the Christian faith off, the public would be in an uproar. They wouldn't sit there trying to justify themselves by the actions of others, "Oh, well, this country did WAAAY worse!" Why do you defend this absurd, meaningless death, when you should be questioning the morality of it? Instead, you view it as an attack on your society or culture. Yeah, right, like any culture should allow you to kill apostates or fake *** witches. Anyone with any ounce of morality can see that killing on the idea of him being a "witch" alone is completely unjustified. Maybe he really was a witch?!
Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Forgot to reply on your other silly point, yes we have a very low crime rate, and I'm not doing the research for your highness. in other words, you're not able to back up what you said with statistics, so its time to safeface With all due respect to all,
Saudi religious people need to understand the difference between future prediction and harmful black magic practice, I am sure all of you had some sort of déjà vu in your lives and told it to someone else and came true (too much Final destination ^^). I say send the guy back to his country if you don’t have any evidence of using black magic to hurt or separate people from each other. Peace. Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Forgot to reply on your other silly point, yes we have a very low crime rate, and I'm not doing the research for your highness. in other words, you're not able to back up what you said with statistics, so its time to safeface Take those "other words" and shove it up your ***, I'm really tired of your small mind, this is gonna be the last post that I read for you or reply to. here is a link http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_tot_cri-crime-total-crimes now *** off Aw look, Naruto avatar kid thinks he's people. :) Let's address this point by point. Ragnarok.Vitaru said: 1. Your country has been living off the world's resources (mainly ours). 2. Your country is killing (and supporting) the killing of millions of people through out the world. If I murder someone, then you murder someone, we are both wrong. My crime doesn't make yours excuseable. Is this really a difficult concept? Ragnarok.Vitaru said: 3. Your citizens are the most ignorant people on earth, because your government want you to be like that. (hence why they invented Fox, Sky, etc.) Ragnarok.Vitaru said: And the bigger problem is that you are DEFENDING THE DECISION OF THE NUCLEAR BOMB! And no, no I am not, I didn't take a position on it. Sectumsempra did, while I pointed out that it was, like most of your points, a non-sequitur. Whether the bombing was wrong or right would not affect the morality of that "witch" getting the death sentence. Ragnarok.Vitaru said: Just how ignorant can you be. Oh, and to my other "silly" point, you still failed to prove that Saudi Arabia has "the lowest crime rate in the world." That source put Saudi Arabia fairly low, and I say more power to ya, but your claim is still false. Tell me, how does that crow taste? :) |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|