FFXI LGBT Community, Who Are You? |
||
|
FFXI LGBT Community, who are you?
Cerberus.Elvyn said: » I can see this thread's decency level deteriorating... and I'm not 100% sure i mind ^^; The thread is still decent, just a few appropriate pics of hot studs isn't going to derail the thread. Just gotta go with the flow. ^_^ Asura.Sechs said: » Or how about this other one? He's 21 or 22 I think, so most wouldn't define him a "man", yet nomnomnomnomnomnom so much sexyness concentrated into a single human being :Q__ _ He's Kieran Brookes of the Newcastle Falcons. Wonder what would he say knowing that he's the sexual icon for so many gay men all around the world. Given how chauvinist, sexist and homophobic the sports world can be...  WOOF! Though I do like my men a little bit older (and not necessarily facial hair unless it looks good on them) this is definitely a step in the right direction!
[+]
Hmmm. Thread needs chubby Chris Pratt.
[+]
Yaaaaas. <3 chubby Chris Pratt. Or any Chris Pratt, really.
@Haorhu: tu connais les Dieux du Stade ?? :D
[+]
I think it's from an annual calendar called "Dieux du Stade" (Gods of the Stadium). Worth a google either way lol
[+]
Raul Castillo (plays Richie on Looking)
 SO CUTE
[+]
This thread needs more Chris Pratt, galkapproved :D
[+]
You all keep posting youngsters. How about a handsome silver fox type?
Ok, here's one! No silver, but looks to be JUST the right age, and the facial hair looks GOOD on him! Clean cut, and handsome.
 And just because a muscle guy gets older doesn't mean he's no longer hot. Case in point below.
[+]
ohh myyy
Shiva.Siviard said: » And just because a muscle guy gets older doesn't mean he's no longer hot. Case in point below. Asura.Sechs said: » Shiva.Siviard said: » And just because a muscle guy gets older doesn't mean he's no longer hot. Case in point below. Hah, sure! Next time I see him I will! I'm not sure if it's him, but he looks just like a muscle bear in Palm Springs, CA I know and bump into at the bars on occasion.
[+]
Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Please be careful what you post in this thread. Those who wish to keep posting images like these will be topicbanned. Lakshmi.Aelius said: » Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Please be careful what you post in this thread. Those who wish to keep posting images like these will be topicbanned. Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? What did I telllll youuuuuu~
Rugby balls covering the goods are a no no. I've seen mods delete similar pictures of women.
Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Bahamut.Protectorchrono said: » Lakshmi.Aelius said: » Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Please be careful what you post in this thread. Those who wish to keep posting images like these will be topicbanned. Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? I thought it, you said it. It's just another example of the man keeping the gay man down. Shiva.Siviard said: » Bahamut.Protectorchrono said: » Lakshmi.Aelius said: » Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Please be careful what you post in this thread. Those who wish to keep posting images like these will be topicbanned. Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? I thought it, you said it. It's just another example of the man keeping the gay man down. None of the images posted on the last few pages meet the criteria that Aelius posted. Just another example of homophobic attitude...
[+]
Calm down. Like Pleebo said, "Rugby balls covering the goods is a no no". I recall seeing one of those here that I no longer see, so it was seemingly removed by Aelius as it falls under strategically covered nudity.
Bismarck.Inference said: » Calm down. Like Pleebo said, "Rugby balls covering the goods is a no no". I recall seeing one of those here that I no longer see, so it was seemingly removed by Aelius as it falls under strategically covered nudity. This. Bahamut.Protectorchrono said: » Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? Did you report them? Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Just another example of homophobic attitude... Quite assertive on the homophobic front, I see. If that were the case, I wouldn't mod this thread at all much less read whatever's in here. Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Shiva.Siviard said: » Bahamut.Protectorchrono said: » Lakshmi.Aelius said: » Quote: Images or videos containing the following are subject for removal: - Strategically covered nudity - Sheer or see-through clothing - Lewd or provocative poses - Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches Please be careful what you post in this thread. Those who wish to keep posting images like these will be topicbanned. Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? I thought it, you said it. It's just another example of the man keeping the gay man down. None of the images posted on the last few pages meet the criteria that Aelius posted. Just another example of homophobic attitude... The only one I saw that even remotely came close to being "risque" <sp?> is the "Fat Chris Pratt" in his underwear one. Unless I missed something? Lakshmi.Aelius said: » Bismarck.Inference said: » Calm down. Like Pleebo said, "Rugby balls covering the goods is a no no". I recall seeing one of those here that I no longer see, so it was seemingly removed by Aelius as it falls under strategically covered nudity. This. Bahamut.Protectorchrono said: » Not to be rude Aelius, but I've seen ppl post pics of near naked women in some threads of which they haven't been removed, so I wonder why are you threatening us with a topic ban when the majority of these pics aren't inappropriate yet pics of near naked women showing their breasts close up get no such warning nor is topicbanned or removed? Did you report them? Ragnarok.Ozment said: » Just another example of homophobic attitude... Quite assertive on the homophobic front, I see. If that were the case, I wouldn't mod this thread at all much less read whatever's in here. Even if I did, would you remove them? I doubt it, because to most mods, if it's women, you'll say "b***s, what the hell lets keep it, but if it's men then it's "Oh no! must remove!". Like this on every forum, if it's near naked females, it won't be removed at all, if it's men, they will remove it. I sense a slight homophobicness about this and I don't think it's fair. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
