Post deleted by User.
ALL TRUMP!!! ALL THE TIME!!!
ALL TRUMP!!! ALL THE TIME!!!
kireek said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
The COLDEST cartoon I have seen....
Trump took over the Republican party and made it more like the Democrat party of 2009, which is why it's no longer the party of the rich and is now the party of the working class (pro-tip, that's a good thing).
Either Sanders is going to take over the Democrat party and turn it into a socialist party that will destroy your nation or they will vote for a former Republican (bloomberg) that bought his nomination and wants to greatly increase tax rates for everyone.
Enjoy those mental cartoons.
Whoa whoa hold up now. The Democratic Party of 2009 was Corporate Centrist. As it was in 92-Now. It was a “middle-class” and up party.
Sanders is not a Socialist in the capacity of what you pretend/imagine him to be. Using taxes on programs to uplift and better society is not equal to the state or an independent cooperative controlling the means of production in a post capitalist transition to communism.
Part of the problem with these conversations is you guys come in here with incorrect definitions to labels you’re using.
[+]
Nah, a chronic liar like you.
/yawn.
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Part of the problem with these conversations is you guys come in here with incorrect definitions to labels you’re using.
Thats what happens when you know nothing.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
I don't really get the point of that cartoon....
[+]
It’s not over analyzing to notice a castrator and a bucket of balls.
[+]
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
It’s not over analyzing to notice a castrator and a bucket of balls.
If you didn't grow up on a farm or experience a castration, the bucket looks like it could be holding ***and the castrator looks like a giant pair of nail clippers.
It isn't ubiquitous knowledge.
[+]
Beyond that, it does nothing to address my original point of it being a bipartisan problem. You could do the exact same cartoon with Pelosi and the House.
[+]
Shiva.Thorny said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
It’s not over analyzing to notice a castrator and a bucket of balls.
If you didn't grow up on a farm or experience a castration, the bucket looks like it could be holding ***and the castrator looks like a giant pair of nail clippers.
It isn't ubiquitous knowledge.
Neither did I.
Guys it’s not hard to pick up on implied meanings. Even in this cartoon it’s explicitly depicted.
Lack of effort to understand the other party is the problem. It’s not a badge of honor.
“I can’t be bothered to get it” is not a good look.
“I don’t understand it because I’m not familiar” is a far better response.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Beyond that, it does nothing to address my original point of it being a bipartisan problem. You could do the exact same cartoon with Pelosi and the House.
Yeah yeah sure we could. We could do it with anything if we use our imaginations and add a spice of creativity.
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Beyond that, it does nothing to address my original point of it being a bipartisan problem. You could do the exact same cartoon with Pelosi and the House.
Yeah yeah sure we could. We could do it with anything if we use our imaginations and add a spice of creativity.
I believe it. Imaginations and creativity have been the primary source of all these investigations into Trump, and look how far they went.
[+]
Yeah impeachment but those were grounded in fact. You would acknowledge that if you were the impartial centrist you pretend to be.
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Yeah impeachment but those were grounded in fact. You would acknowledge that if you were the impartial centrist you pretend to be.
Oh no. I believe every crime that was listed in the articles of impeachment actually occurred.
I know you think there were no crimes listed but and think you’re make a funny by regurgitating a conservative media bubble talking point.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
[+]
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
I know you think there were no crimes listed but and think you’re make a funny by regurgitating a conservative media bubble talking point.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Oh yeah? Then clearly those statutes are listed specifically in the articles. Please quote the articles verbatim where Title 18, United States Code Section 201 and Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512 are mentioned. Shouldn’t be hard for you since, according to your own words, they were contained in the articles.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
I know you think there were no crimes listed but and think you’re make a funny by regurgitating a conservative media bubble talking point.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Oh yeah? Then clearly those statutes are listed specifically in the articles. Please quote the articles verbatim where Title 18, United States Code Section 201 and Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512 are mentioned. Shouldn’t be hard for you since, according to your own words, they were contained in the articles.
If you knew what the statues were you'd see they were explicitly described in the Articles. You know I've around long enough to not play this game. If you intentionally want to be obtuse go right ahead, ignorance is bliss.
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
I know you think there were no crimes listed but and think you’re make a funny by regurgitating a conservative media bubble talking point.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Title 18, United States Code Section 201
Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512
Were contained in the Articles.
You would know that if you actually read them or gave an honest effort in understanding the issue the Dems were making.
Oh yeah? Then clearly those statutes are listed specifically in the articles. Please quote the articles verbatim where Title 18, United States Code Section 201 and Title 18, United States Code Section 1505 and 1512 are mentioned. Shouldn’t be hard for you since, according to your own words, they were contained in the articles.
If you knew what the statues were you'd see they were explicitly described in the Articles. You know I've around long enough to not play this game. If you intentionally want to be obtuse go right ahead, ignorance is bliss.
So, you can’t do it? It’s cool, no worries. I just figured that when I was referring to listed crimes and you got super triggered talking about explicit crimes with specific and listed statutes that you would be able to show those. What you actually did was give me implicit crimes with wording that maybe you can Ctrl+F to find some law somewhere that might have been broken.
It’s almost as if no specific statutes were listed for a reason, even though impeachment articles for past presidents had them spelled out. Makes you wonder.
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.