Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy Edition

Langues: JP EN DE FR
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy edition
Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy edition
First Page 2 3 ... 53 54 55 ... 111 112 113
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-11-13 15:53:23
Link | Citer | R
 
Anna Ruthven said: »
Why would a fairly intelligent guy in his 30's want to date teenagers? Do people not realize how *** stupid teenagers are?

You kind of answered your own question.

Though really the truth of matter is ...

It’s so that it will be a bad day for the libs
[+]
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 16:00:35
Link | Citer | R
 
Had to get a new license plate for the hunting rig.

[+]
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-11-13 16:05:52
Link | Citer | R
 
Side note if you google

bd4 libz:



Mind blown
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 16:12:33
Link | Citer | R
 
TIL if you post your license plate number, 01 will Google it.

Bad day for libs.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-11-13 16:29:09
Link | Citer | R
 
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/545738/

Quote:
The Atlantic


Peter Nicholls / Reuters
The Secret Correspondence Between Donald Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks

The transparency organization asked the president’s son for his cooperation—in sharing its work, in contesting the results of the election, and in arranging for Julian Assange to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.

JULIA IOFFE
4:22 PM ET POLITICS
Subscribe to The Atlantic’s Politics & Policy Daily, a roundup of ideas and events in American politics.


Just before the stroke of midnight on September 20, 2016, at the height of last year’s presidential election, the WikiLeaks Twitter account sent a private direct message to Donald Trump Jr., the Republican nominee’s oldest son and campaign surrogate. “A PAC run anti-Trump site putintrump.org is about to launch,” WikiLeaks wrote. “The PAC is a recycled pro-Iraq war PAC. We have guessed the password. It is ‘putintrump.’ See ‘About’ for who is behind it. Any comments?” (The site, which has since become a joint project with Mother Jones, was founded by Rob Glaser, a tech entrepreneur, and was funded by Progress for USA Political Action Committee.)

The next morning, about 12 hours later, Trump Jr. responded to WikiLeaks. “Off the record I don’t know who that is, but I’ll ask around,” he wrote on September 21, 2016. “Thanks.”

The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.’s lawyers to congressional investigators. They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son that continued until at least July 2017. The messages show WikiLeaks, a radical transparency organization that the American intelligence community believes was chosen by the Russian government to disseminate the information it had hacked, actively soliciting Trump Jr.’s cooperation. WikiLeaks made a series of increasingly bold requests, including asking for Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.

“Over the last several months, we have worked cooperatively with each of the committees and have voluntarily turned over thousands of documents in response to their requests,” said Alan Futerfas, an attorney for Donald Trump Jr. “Putting aside the question as to why or by whom such documents, provided to Congress under promises of confidentiality, have been selectively leaked, we can say with confidence that we have no concerns about these documents and any questions raised about them have been easily answered in the appropriate forum.” WikiLeaks did not respond to requests for comment.

The messages were turned over to Congress as part of that body’s various ongoing investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. American intelligence services have accused the Kremlin of engaging in a deliberate effort to boost President Donald Trump’s chances while bringing down his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. That effort—and the president’s response to it—has spawned multiple congressional investigations, and a special counsel inquiry that has led to the indictment of Trump’s former campaign chair, Paul Manafort, for financial crimes.

Though Trump Jr. mostly ignored the frequent messages from WikiLeaks, he at times appears to have acted on its requests. When WikiLeaks first reached out to Trump Jr. about putintrump.org, for instance, Trump Jr. followed up on his promise to “ask around.” According to a source familiar with the congressional investigations into Russian interference with the 2016 campaign, who requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, on the same day that Trump Jr. received the first message from WikiLeaks, he emailed other senior officials with the Trump campaign, including Steve Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Brad Parscale, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, telling them WikiLeaks had made contact. Kushner then forwarded the email to campaign communications staffer Hope Hicks. At no point during the 10-month correspondence does Trump Jr. rebuff WikiLeaks, which had published stolen documents and was already observed to be releasing information that benefited Russian interests.

On October 3, 2016, WikiLeaks wrote again. “Hiya, it’d be great if you guys could comment on/push this story,” WikiLeaks suggested, attaching a quote from then-Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton about wanting to “just drone” WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.

“Already did that earlier today,” Trump Jr. responded an hour-and-a-half later. “It’s amazing what she can get away with.”

Two minutes later, Trump Jr. wrote again, asking, “What’s behind this Wednesday leak I keep reading about?” The day before, Roger Stone, an informal advisor to Donald Trump, had tweeted, “Wednesday@HillaryClinton is done. #WikiLeaks.”

WikiLeaks didn’t respond to that message, but on October 12, 2016, the account again messaged Trump Jr. “Hey Donald, great to see you and your dad talking about our publications,” WikiLeaks wrote. (At a rally on October 10, Donald Trump had proclaimed, “I love WikiLeaks!”)

“Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us,” WikiLeaks went on, pointing Trump Jr. to the link wlsearch.tk, which it said would help Trump’s followers dig through the trove of stolen documents and find stories. “There’s many great stories the press are missing and we’re sure some of your follows [sic] will find it,” WikiLeaks went on. “Btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message. But just 15 minutes after it was sent, as The Wall Street Journal’s Byron Tau pointed out, Donald Trump himself tweeted, “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!”

Two days later, on October 14, 2016, Trump Jr. tweeted out the link WikiLeaks had provided him. “For those who have the time to read about all the corruption and hypocrisy all the @wikileaks emails are right here: http://wlsearch.tk/,” he wrote.

After this point, Trump Jr. ceased to respond to WikiLeaks’s direct messages, but WikiLeaks escalated its requests.

“Hey Don. We have an unusual idea,” WikiLeaks wrote on October 21, 2016. “Leak us one or more of your father’s tax returns.” WikiLeaks then laid out three reasons why this would benefit both the Trumps and WikiLeaks. One, The New York Times had already published a fragment of Trump’s tax returns on October 1; two, the rest could come out any time “through the most biased source (e.g. NYT/MSNBC).”

It is the third reason, though, WikiLeaks wrote, that “is the real kicker.” “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” WikiLeaks explained. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source.” It then provided an email address and link where the Trump campaign could send the tax returns, and adds, “The same for any other negative stuff (documents, recordings) that you think has a decent chance of coming out. Let us put it out.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message.


[WikiLeaks didn’t write again until Election Day, November 8, 2016. “Hi Don if your father ‘loses’ we think it is much more interesting if he DOES NOT conceed [sic] and spends time CHALLENGING the media and other types of rigging that occurred—as he has implied that he might do,” WikiLeaks wrote at 6:35pm, when the idea that Clinton would win was still the prevailing conventional wisdom. (As late as 7:00pm that night, FiveThirtyEight, a trusted prognosticator of the election, gave Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning the presidency.) WikiLeaks insisted that contesting the election results would be good for Trump’s rumored plans to start a media network should he lose the presidency. “The discussion can be transformative as it exposes media corruption, primary corruption, PAC corruption, etc.,” WikiLeaks wrote.

Shortly after midnight that day, when it was clear that Trump had beaten all expectations and won the presidency, WikiLeaks sent him a simple message: “Wow.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to these messages either, but WikiLeaks was undeterred. “Hi Don. Hope you’re doing well!” WikiLeaks wrote on December 16 to Trump Jr., who was by then the son of the president-elect. “In relation to Mr. Assange: Obama/Clinton placed pressure on Sweden, UK and Australia (his home country) to illicitly go after Mr. Assange. It would be real easy and helpful for your dad to suggest that Australia appoint Assange ambassador to Washington, DC.”

WikiLeaks even imagined how Trump might put it: “‘That’s a real smart tough guy and the most famous australian [sic] you have!’ or something similar,” WikiLeaks wrote. “They won’t do it but it will send the right signals to Australia, UK + Sweden to start following the law and stop bending it to ingratiate themselves with the Clintons.” (On December 7, Assange, proclaiming his innocence, had released his testimony in front of London investigators looking into accusations that he had committed alleged sexual assault.)

In the winter and spring, WikiLeaks went largely silent, only occasionally sending Trump Jr. links. But on July 11, 2017, three days after The New York Times broke the story about Trump Jr.’s June 2016 meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer with connections to Russia’s powerful prosecutor general, WikiLeaks got in touch again.

“Hi Don. Sorry to hear about your problems,” WikiLeaks wrote. “We have an idea that may help a little. We are VERY interested in confidentially obtaining and publishing a copy of the email(s) cited in the New York Times today,” citing a reference in the paper to emails Trump Jr had exchanged with Rob Goldstone, a publicist who had helped set up the meeting. “We think this is strongly in your interest,” WikiLeaks went on. It then reprised many of the same arguments it made in trying to convince Trump Jr. to turn over his father’s tax returns, including the argument that Trump’s enemies in the press were using the emails to spin an unfavorable narrative of the meeting. “Us publishing not only deprives them of this ability but is beautifully confounding.”

The message was sent at 9:29 am on July 11. Trump Jr. did not respond, but just hours later, he posted the emails himself, on his own Twitter feed.

TLDR: bad day 4da libz.

But don’t be lazy; read.
 Cerberus.Pleebo
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Pleebo
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2017-11-13 16:31:39
Link | Citer | R
 
Zerowone said: »
But don’t be lazy; read.
I'm too busy making a fortune selling pre-smashed Keurig machines on ebay.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-11-13 16:49:37
Link | Citer | R
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
McConnell is just a sore looser, his candidate got thrown out during the primay and he would rather give away a seat than welcome in an outsider i to the DC club.
Or, just perhaps, a few of the family values republicans actually HAVE family values?
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
...
Until then, show me the proofs.
Read the transcript.
Chanti. You don't really believe this ***do you? I mean you realize it's a partisan attack and the volume on the smear machine is broken right now right?

People showing up next to Gloria Alred with weeks to go before voting day and you REALLY don't even consider anything fishy or co-ordinated could be going on?
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-11-13 16:50:10
Link | Citer | R
 
I mean I can rationalize you don't care, but it's tough to swallow that you don't understand.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2017-11-13 16:58:12
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2017-11-13 17:03:21
Link | Citer | R
 
Anna Ruthven said: »
Bad day for libs.

You guys sure do know how to beat a joke to death.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-11-13 17:05:50
Link | Citer | R
 
Candlejack said: »
Nausi.chr has been deleted successfully.
Nausi.ru has been installed successfully.
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-11-13 17:14:11
Link | Citer | R
 
Former employee of Clinton accuses Moore of rape 40 years ago with no proof. Listen and believe, sheeple!
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2017-11-13 18:03:23
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
user: Chanti
Posts: 11397
By Garuda.Chanti 2017-11-13 18:04:34
Link | Citer | R
 
Nausi said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
McConnell is just a sore looser, his candidate got thrown out during the primay and he would rather give away a seat than welcome in an outsider i to the DC club.
Or, just perhaps, a few of the family values republicans actually HAVE family values?
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
...
Until then, show me the proofs.
Read the transcript.
Chanti. You don't really believe this ***do you? I mean you realize it's a partisan attack and the volume on the smear machine is broken right now right?

People showing up next to Gloria Alred with weeks to go before voting day and you REALLY don't even consider anything fishy or co-ordinated could be going on?
Please do read the transcript. This woman is a Republican from a rock ribbed Republican family. She told several people about it long before this started to blow up.

P. S. Fishy or co-ordinated is ALWAYS going on.

P. P. S. AL.com is The Birmingham News. It would not be the largest paper in AL if it had a liberal slant.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2017-11-13 18:53:30
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 19:01:23
Link | Citer | R
 
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Bad day for libs.

You guys sure do know how to beat a joke to death.
Ben Ghazi did it.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:13:06
Link | Citer | R
 
Anna Ruthven said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Bad day for libs.

You guys sure do know how to beat a joke to death.
Ben Ghazi did it.
YouTube Video Placeholder
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:24:25
Link | Citer | R
 
Zerowone said: »
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/545738/

Quote:
The Atlantic


Peter Nicholls / Reuters
The Secret Correspondence Between Donald Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks

The transparency organization asked the president’s son for his cooperation—in sharing its work, in contesting the results of the election, and in arranging for Julian Assange to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.

JULIA IOFFE
4:22 PM ET POLITICS
Subscribe to The Atlantic’s Politics & Policy Daily, a roundup of ideas and events in American politics.


Just before the stroke of midnight on September 20, 2016, at the height of last year’s presidential election, the WikiLeaks Twitter account sent a private direct message to Donald Trump Jr., the Republican nominee’s oldest son and campaign surrogate. “A PAC run anti-Trump site putintrump.org is about to launch,” WikiLeaks wrote. “The PAC is a recycled pro-Iraq war PAC. We have guessed the password. It is ‘putintrump.’ See ‘About’ for who is behind it. Any comments?” (The site, which has since become a joint project with Mother Jones, was founded by Rob Glaser, a tech entrepreneur, and was funded by Progress for USA Political Action Committee.)

The next morning, about 12 hours later, Trump Jr. responded to WikiLeaks. “Off the record I don’t know who that is, but I’ll ask around,” he wrote on September 21, 2016. “Thanks.”

The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.’s lawyers to congressional investigators. They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son that continued until at least July 2017. The messages show WikiLeaks, a radical transparency organization that the American intelligence community believes was chosen by the Russian government to disseminate the information it had hacked, actively soliciting Trump Jr.’s cooperation. WikiLeaks made a series of increasingly bold requests, including asking for Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.

“Over the last several months, we have worked cooperatively with each of the committees and have voluntarily turned over thousands of documents in response to their requests,” said Alan Futerfas, an attorney for Donald Trump Jr. “Putting aside the question as to why or by whom such documents, provided to Congress under promises of confidentiality, have been selectively leaked, we can say with confidence that we have no concerns about these documents and any questions raised about them have been easily answered in the appropriate forum.” WikiLeaks did not respond to requests for comment.

The messages were turned over to Congress as part of that body’s various ongoing investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. American intelligence services have accused the Kremlin of engaging in a deliberate effort to boost President Donald Trump’s chances while bringing down his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. That effort—and the president’s response to it—has spawned multiple congressional investigations, and a special counsel inquiry that has led to the indictment of Trump’s former campaign chair, Paul Manafort, for financial crimes.

Though Trump Jr. mostly ignored the frequent messages from WikiLeaks, he at times appears to have acted on its requests. When WikiLeaks first reached out to Trump Jr. about putintrump.org, for instance, Trump Jr. followed up on his promise to “ask around.” According to a source familiar with the congressional investigations into Russian interference with the 2016 campaign, who requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, on the same day that Trump Jr. received the first message from WikiLeaks, he emailed other senior officials with the Trump campaign, including Steve Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Brad Parscale, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, telling them WikiLeaks had made contact. Kushner then forwarded the email to campaign communications staffer Hope Hicks. At no point during the 10-month correspondence does Trump Jr. rebuff WikiLeaks, which had published stolen documents and was already observed to be releasing information that benefited Russian interests.

On October 3, 2016, WikiLeaks wrote again. “Hiya, it’d be great if you guys could comment on/push this story,” WikiLeaks suggested, attaching a quote from then-Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton about wanting to “just drone” WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.

“Already did that earlier today,” Trump Jr. responded an hour-and-a-half later. “It’s amazing what she can get away with.”

Two minutes later, Trump Jr. wrote again, asking, “What’s behind this Wednesday leak I keep reading about?” The day before, Roger Stone, an informal advisor to Donald Trump, had tweeted, “Wednesday@HillaryClinton is done. #WikiLeaks.”

WikiLeaks didn’t respond to that message, but on October 12, 2016, the account again messaged Trump Jr. “Hey Donald, great to see you and your dad talking about our publications,” WikiLeaks wrote. (At a rally on October 10, Donald Trump had proclaimed, “I love WikiLeaks!”)

“Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us,” WikiLeaks went on, pointing Trump Jr. to the link wlsearch.tk, which it said would help Trump’s followers dig through the trove of stolen documents and find stories. “There’s many great stories the press are missing and we’re sure some of your follows [sic] will find it,” WikiLeaks went on. “Btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message. But just 15 minutes after it was sent, as The Wall Street Journal’s Byron Tau pointed out, Donald Trump himself tweeted, “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!”

Two days later, on October 14, 2016, Trump Jr. tweeted out the link WikiLeaks had provided him. “For those who have the time to read about all the corruption and hypocrisy all the @wikileaks emails are right here: http://wlsearch.tk/,” he wrote.

After this point, Trump Jr. ceased to respond to WikiLeaks’s direct messages, but WikiLeaks escalated its requests.

“Hey Don. We have an unusual idea,” WikiLeaks wrote on October 21, 2016. “Leak us one or more of your father’s tax returns.” WikiLeaks then laid out three reasons why this would benefit both the Trumps and WikiLeaks. One, The New York Times had already published a fragment of Trump’s tax returns on October 1; two, the rest could come out any time “through the most biased source (e.g. NYT/MSNBC).”

It is the third reason, though, WikiLeaks wrote, that “is the real kicker.” “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” WikiLeaks explained. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source.” It then provided an email address and link where the Trump campaign could send the tax returns, and adds, “The same for any other negative stuff (documents, recordings) that you think has a decent chance of coming out. Let us put it out.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message.


[WikiLeaks didn’t write again until Election Day, November 8, 2016. “Hi Don if your father ‘loses’ we think it is much more interesting if he DOES NOT conceed [sic] and spends time CHALLENGING the media and other types of rigging that occurred—as he has implied that he might do,” WikiLeaks wrote at 6:35pm, when the idea that Clinton would win was still the prevailing conventional wisdom. (As late as 7:00pm that night, FiveThirtyEight, a trusted prognosticator of the election, gave Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning the presidency.) WikiLeaks insisted that contesting the election results would be good for Trump’s rumored plans to start a media network should he lose the presidency. “The discussion can be transformative as it exposes media corruption, primary corruption, PAC corruption, etc.,” WikiLeaks wrote.

Shortly after midnight that day, when it was clear that Trump had beaten all expectations and won the presidency, WikiLeaks sent him a simple message: “Wow.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to these messages either, but WikiLeaks was undeterred. “Hi Don. Hope you’re doing well!” WikiLeaks wrote on December 16 to Trump Jr., who was by then the son of the president-elect. “In relation to Mr. Assange: Obama/Clinton placed pressure on Sweden, UK and Australia (his home country) to illicitly go after Mr. Assange. It would be real easy and helpful for your dad to suggest that Australia appoint Assange ambassador to Washington, DC.”

WikiLeaks even imagined how Trump might put it: “‘That’s a real smart tough guy and the most famous australian [sic] you have!’ or something similar,” WikiLeaks wrote. “They won’t do it but it will send the right signals to Australia, UK + Sweden to start following the law and stop bending it to ingratiate themselves with the Clintons.” (On December 7, Assange, proclaiming his innocence, had released his testimony in front of London investigators looking into accusations that he had committed alleged sexual assault.)

In the winter and spring, WikiLeaks went largely silent, only occasionally sending Trump Jr. links. But on July 11, 2017, three days after The New York Times broke the story about Trump Jr.’s June 2016 meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer with connections to Russia’s powerful prosecutor general, WikiLeaks got in touch again.

“Hi Don. Sorry to hear about your problems,” WikiLeaks wrote. “We have an idea that may help a little. We are VERY interested in confidentially obtaining and publishing a copy of the email(s) cited in the New York Times today,” citing a reference in the paper to emails Trump Jr had exchanged with Rob Goldstone, a publicist who had helped set up the meeting. “We think this is strongly in your interest,” WikiLeaks went on. It then reprised many of the same arguments it made in trying to convince Trump Jr. to turn over his father’s tax returns, including the argument that Trump’s enemies in the press were using the emails to spin an unfavorable narrative of the meeting. “Us publishing not only deprives them of this ability but is beautifully confounding.”

The message was sent at 9:29 am on July 11. Trump Jr. did not respond, but just hours later, he posted the emails himself, on his own Twitter feed.

TLDR: bad day 4da libz.

But don’t be lazy; read.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:25:01
Link | Citer | R
 
Feel free to use that image a lot cause that sums up the PnR experience.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 559
By Eboneezer 2017-11-13 19:26:45
Link | Citer | R
 
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:29:20
Link | Citer | R
 
Candlejack said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
McConnell is just a sore looser, his candidate got thrown out during the primay and he would rather give away a seat than welcome in an outsider i to the DC club.
Or, just perhaps, a few of the family values republicans actually HAVE family values?
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Nausi said: »
...
Until then, show me the proofs.
Read the transcript.
Chanti. You don't really believe this ***do you? I mean you realize it's a partisan attack and the volume on the smear machine is broken right now right?

People showing up next to Gloria Alred with weeks to go before voting day and you REALLY don't even consider anything fishy or co-ordinated could be going on?
Please do read the transcript. This woman is a Republican from a rock ribbed Republican family. She told several people about it long before this started to blow up.

P. S. Fishy or co-ordinated is ALWAYS going on.

P. P. S. AL.com is The Birmingham News. It would not be the largest paper in AL if it had a liberal slant.
Nausi wants proof? The lady has a note in her yearbook written by Moore, himself. That, alone, validates her story.

Go alert the proper authorities justice must be done !
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 19:31:45
Link | Citer | R
 
Eboneezer said: »
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
I think I wrote wierd ***in my friends yearbooks.

Like "*** in a blender."
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:32:38
Link | Citer | R
 
Anna Ruthven said: »
Eboneezer said: »
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
I think I wrote wierd ***in my friends yearbooks.

Like "*** in a blender."

You like you don't have any friends !
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 19:35:24
Link | Citer | R
 
fonewear said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Eboneezer said: »
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
I think I wrote wierd ***in my friends yearbooks.

Like "*** in a blender."

You like you don't have any friends !
Just because I hate everyone doesn't mean I have no friends.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:37:43
Link | Citer | R
 
Anna Ruthven said: »
fonewear said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Eboneezer said: »
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
I think I wrote wierd ***in my friends yearbooks.

Like "*** in a blender."

You like you don't have any friends !
Just because I hate everyone doesn't mean I have no friends.

That may be true I"m sure you and the other mods have some sort of mod table. And you sit there discussing mod things.
Forum Moderator
Offline
Serveur: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25993
By Anna Ruthven 2017-11-13 19:41:43
Link | Citer | R
 
fonewear said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
fonewear said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Eboneezer said: »
All I ever got in my yearbooks were stupid notes like signing my crack. Wish somebody would have written something interesting like a confession to sexual assault in mine.
I think I wrote wierd ***in my friends yearbooks.

Like "*** in a blender."

You like you don't have any friends !
Just because I hate everyone doesn't mean I have no friends.

That may be true I"m sure you and the other mods have some sort of mod table. And you sit there discussing mod things.
I think the last thing posted in the mod channel was me sending Ackeron a YouTube video of a furry dancing to a Spanish version of Blondie's Call Me.
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-11-13 19:43:29
Link | Citer | R
 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-alabama-mall-banned-roy-moore-in-the-80s-for-pursuing-teens


Bahdday4lybz!
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:46:37
Link | Citer | R
 
Who doesn't chase girls at the mall !
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:47:00
Link | Citer | R
 
If you go to Alabama that is about all there is to do.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-11-13 19:54:42
Link | Citer | R
 
A really bad day for liberals....November 8 2016...and I've been loving it every since.
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 53 54 55 ... 111 112 113
Log in to post.