Post deleted by User.
Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy Edition |
||
Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy edition
YouTube Video Placeholder I woke up this morning with a bit of a liberal conundrum on my hands.
Imagine an individual is born biologically female and of African American heritage. Now imagine this individual is both transracial and transgender and they identify as a cis white male. Question is are they scum? If SJWs don't see this individual human as scum with both cis and white male privilege, said SJWs are oppressing the individual human being in question as they are disregarding his identity. Offline
Posts: 35422
Anna Ruthven said: » I woke up this morning with a bit of a liberal conundrum on my hands. Imagine an individual is born biologically female and of African American heritage. Now imagine this individual is both transracial and transgender and they identify as a cis white male. Question is are they scum? If SJWs don't see this individual human as scum with both cis and white male privilege, said SJWs are oppressing the individual human being in question as they are disregarding his identity. What the *** are you talking about Donny ? Offline
Posts: 35422
Garuda.Chanti said: » YouTube Video Placeholder This is why I don't watch the Simpsons anymore. It is pure trash. Offline
Posts: 35422
Also Moe would never donate to Puerto Rico he is a scumbag.
Offline
Posts: 35422
This is America you can do or say whatever you want...you want to be a cis male unicorn do it...just don't bother me with your *** and I won't bother you.
Offline
Posts: 9772
fonewear said: » What the *** are you talking about Donny ? That’s the point! Anna Ruthven said: » I woke up this morning with a bit of a liberal conundrum on my hands. Imagine an individual is born biologically female and of African American heritage. Now imagine this individual is both transracial and transgender and they identify as a cis white male. Question is are they scum? If SJWs don't see this individual human as scum with both cis and white male privilege, said SJWs are oppressing the individual human being in question as they are disregarding his identity. Too bad Michael Jackson isn’t alive to provide an answer. Interesting piece.
Jenna Abrams, Russia’s Clown Troll Princess, Duped the Mainstream Media and the World Roseanne Barr and Michael McFaul argued with her on Twitter. BuzzFeed and The New York Times cited her tweets. But Jenna Abrams was the fictional creation of a Russian troll farm. The daily beast Anytime I hear "Russian troll farm" the mental image is funny.
Can't have high unemployment rates if you starve the unemployed to death. Offline
Posts: 35422
Pure evil:
YouTube Video Placeholder Offline
Posts: 35422
PnR theme song:
YouTube Video Placeholder Intersting observation courtesy of Kevin G Shinnick:
Quote: “I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didn’t take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it’s so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly “corrupt” the Democrats are. So why don’t we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) – 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as “scandal free” they aren’t speaking wishfully, they’re simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) – 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) – 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence. That’s right nearly 8 yrs of investigations. Tens of millions spent and 30 yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence. Reagan (R) – 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence. Nixon (R) – 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) – 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences. So, let’s see where that leaves us. In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That’s one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That’s more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren’t really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn’t found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it’s a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let’s just go over the numbers one more time, shall we? 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences. Those aren’t “feelings” or “alternate facts.” Those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency. Or that's just evidence that the Democrats get away with it more often.
But the republicans try harder.
Offline
Posts: 9772
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Or that's just evidence that the Democrats get away with it more often. I'm not aware of any President serving time in prison, thus the whole "prison sentences" sounds kinda *** along with Clinton never being "convicted". Sounds like someone just wrote in any disagreement as a "conviction". Because the President is the only member of the executive branch, lol.
Zerowone said: » Random people with nothing better to do than hold stupid signs is completely newsworthy. Garuda.Chanti said: » But the republicans try harder. Well DUH... we're evil.... also you have to do something at all to even be investigated...obama golfed, clinton was a poon hound and carter was too busy trying to pretend he didn't know billy... Try listing their acomplishments... Actually Cis stands for Comfortable In Skin.
Offline
Posts: 9772
Lmao Wilbur Ross...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/leaked-documents-show-commerce-secretary-concealed-ties-putin-cronies-n817711 Time to read them Panama Papers. Offline
Posts: 9772
Garuda.Chanti said: » Actually Cis stands for Comfortable In Skin. What if you aren't trans but aren't comfortable in your own skin? An obese person who wishes to lose weight for example. I've found that when you start looking at what many of these labels mean that are being thrown around these days, they are very vague. Iirc, transgender and transsexual mean two different things because, according to SJWs, sex and gender are two different things. Iirc, they see a person's sex as something biological whereas a person's gender is simply seen as a social construct, a part of one's identity. Under these rules they rationalize "there are 72 genders." I think "transsexual" is considered an inappropriate term despite it having a different meaning at one time. I could argue that, by SJW logic the term "transgender" is actually more insulting as it implies that while you can change your gender, you can't change your sex which is the goal of pretty much every trans person I've ever met. Under this assumption, the term "transgender" is belittling because anyone can claim they are transgender just because they identify as a non-binary gender identity. These people could claim the trans card just by saying they are gender fluid and not actually have to go through the many emotional, mental, financial, and physical hardships trans people do. This is one of many reasons the SJWs are considered ***-backwards. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|