Random Politics & Religion #24

incorrect! We know she trafficked in classified info.

She has 100x times more evidence pointing to improper and illegal conduct whilst sec of state

Theres piles of evidence her campaign rigged the election with the DNC

I don't know I just wanted to hear the reading rainbow song.

Well, ***, all I posted was a .jpg

I'm not going to go far down this route because it will be harder for me to argue against a point I wholly agree with, but let's play the devils advocate.

We have the leaked emails, that the internet went through and yet they found no smoking gun in a single email.

Nothing of which Comey said was "damning" enough to ship Clinton to jail.

There is no damning evidence that Wikileaks has provided that would implicate Clinton on those charges though. Just information we can visibly see but clearly not enough to catch her on charges.

IF there was damning evidence in the leaks then she would have been in jail, period. But there was nothing that was tangible enough.

Again, in the same notion, we have a ton of leaks about Trumps wrong doing, evidence that implicate his aids, Comey's Testimony also those "fake" dossiers.

There is a lot of stuff presented out there in the case of Trump too but none of it contains substantial enough information.

You guys either:

A. Blindside yourself to Trumps stuff
B. Over extrapolate anything related to Hillary.

Either way your bias shows.

Clearly there isn't. If there was hard evidence she would have been convicted. Even Trump isn't going after her anymore.

No, not really. But if the liberals/democrats are going to decry collusion, they certainly forgetting that they themselves colluded with the Clinton campaign to make sure that Sanders doesn't even get a fair chance at the presidency.

He basically stated what laws Clinton broke, but in the same breath, said "no prosecutor will convict Clinton because she didn't mean to do it." (Paraphrasing)

Since when does intent come to play on prosecuting criminal cases?

Like what? What he is able to do? Like to unclassify documents?

I still want to find out what sort of impeachable offence these "leaks" have portrayed.

A lot of stuff that is leaked has just as much chance of being true as it does being completely made up. The problem is, the bias from those reporting such is so strong, you would have to be reasonably cautious to believe any of it. Case in point: That Buzzfeed dossier.

You accuse us of bias? Your hypocrisy is showing.

cant decide if i think senator warden sounds more like Sylvester the cat or Daffy duck.

"suffering succotash" vs "this means war"

Wrong again. Comey had plenty to press charges on (he laid them all out), he just decided not to. There's this thing called "politics" that people like to pretend isn't a factor in the magical land of Non-Partisonia where FBI directors have 100% integrity.


Define "wrong doing". Anything short of illegal and you have nothing. There might be something on an aide or two, and that's probably the only thing they'll get out of this witch hunt. As for the dossiers... just don't.

Right, the government could never be full of corrupt hacks who freely break the law without fear of consequence.

Jesus you have so much to learn

Are you aware of what playing the devil's advocate means?



IIRC the reason they couldn't charge her was because they had nab her on intent specifically but they couldn't prove that so he simply stated that she show negligence... but not gross negligence the clean type.



And you don't think the same can be said about the case for Hillary? Isn't that called confirmation bias?



Trumps government included right? Thanks for proving my point. Even Rav agreed with you.


If he could have charged, he would have. When did he lay out all of the things he could have charged her with?

I mean ***Comey reopened the investigation against her because they found more emails. He didn't have to do that. If he was partisan why would he compromise her election by opening up the investigation again? Keep your "Comey is a left hack" painted picture hanging though. It is clear by his hate from the left and the right that that man has little bias in terms of Clinton vs. Trump.

Duck Season Rabbit Season !

I mean, there is a mountain of proof that I despise Clinton, more so than Trump but I hold them to the same standard and I won't let a political bias control my line of thinking in this process.

How do you know this? Law is not dictated by robots. In many cases the decision to press charges is highly dictated by subjective opinions. Especially once you hit the world of heavy political pressures it is never cut and dry.

Comey is a human being, subject to the same biases and opinions as everyone else. I feel like you're white-knighting the person you want him to be, not the person he really is.

Were you not the one talking about self-awareness?

I would psycho analyze you guys but I'm afraid of what I would learn.

No, intent, or lack of intent, does not excuse criminal activity. Especially when it comes to disseminating classified information or setting up a server to bypass FOIA laws store classified information on.

Nobody in the Obama Administration would prosecute her because she is a Clinton. Trump's and his administration can't prosecute her because she is a political opponent who just lost the national election...to Trump!

But she did break the law, and anyone whose last name isn't Clinton would already be in a jail cell.

Sure, the emails could be fake. Doesn't seem that way though.

She and Podesta already admitted that those emails are true.

It is not the FBI's job to press charges.

Repeat:

It is not the FBI's job to press charges.

What he did was recommend no charges, which is what the Justice Department was supposed to do (but Lynch couldn't do it herself because she had to recuse herself due to her involvement with Bill Clinton, although it seems like she didn't even recuse herself at all).

To say that Clinton is innocent for any crime is like sticking your head in a whole in the ground (or up somebody's ***) and ignoring the evidence and facts surrounding the investigation.

Maybe we can all take a Rorschach test:

What do you see ?

Russian collusion!

Obstruction of justice!

Drumpf is done!

Definitely a Firefly emblem in there.

I see a cruel reminder of US Politics.

I also see Hillary Clinton with emails.
Barack Obama's birth certificate.
George Bush harvesting oil in iran.
Trump obstructing Comey's justice.
A bird pooping on the side walk.
KN telling us about logical fallacies.
Lordgrim removing all the fluoride from his water.

I didn't say Russia helped him and no one consulted me about what candidates should run.

Looking at the retards candidates from last election, maybe we should listen to you next time.

White and Black skeletons dancing and watching each other dance. They're clashing together, butting heads.

I see....

When the men in white coats arrive, please do exactly as they say. It's for your own good.

Looks like a hip xray to me honestly...

Trump had a farm
E-I-E-I-O
And on his farm he had an investigation
E-I-E-I-O
With a WAAAH WAAAH here
And a WAAAH WAAAH there
Here a WAAAH, there a WAAAH
Everywhere a WAAH WAAAH
Trump had a farm
E-I-E-I-O

Shooting at GOP lead baseball practice.

I'd like to think that you read my post, went to sleep and had a dream about an amazing reply. Woke up and were all giddy to post it.

I didn't read your post I sensed it !