Yatenkou said: »
Ben was a great pick because he's a success story who grew up in the government housing
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16 |
||
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16
Yatenkou said: » Ben was a great pick because he's a success story who grew up in the government housing Anna Ruthven said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Anna Ruthven said: » At this point, I'm just along for the ride. I can let ***get to me, get pissed, or whatever...or I can just let ***happen and watch the backlash as the consequences roll in. News is only reliable these days if they tell you what you want to believe... if they don't then they're unreliable...
Valefor.Sehachan said: » I think Samantha Bee made a good joke about this. Nothing that comes out of that tart's mouth has ever been funny. Yatenkou said: » Even if it is cliche, Ben was a great pick because he's a success story who grew up in the government housing. I think he'll really do some good for the people there. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Yatenkou said: » My main problem is that, how do you influence an election and lose the popular vote by over 2.5 million votes? I think you just don't understand what the word influence means. Clearly or they wouldn't think Info Wars and the like could be a reliable source of news. "Info" is in their name! It must be legit! Yatenkou said: » My main problem is that, how do you influence an election and lose the popular vote by over 2.5 million votes? Hello uranium deal. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » News is only reliable these days if they tell you what you want to believe... if they don't then they're unreliable... You mean the deal that required approval from several departments outside Clinton's sphere of influence?
Offline
Posts: 2442
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Influence, not directly hack voting machines. By discrediting the unfavourable candidate and helping the propaganda of the favourable one. Russia does this nearly anywhere in the world. I'm pretty sure the USA does it too, just to be fair. Yatenkou said: » My main problem is that, how do you influence an election and lose the popular vote by over 2.5 million votes? Not sure how this is problem. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Yep, nobody cared. Back to silly posting then I guess. *draws a big penis on the thread page* And by the time the world gets to know your current prime minister*, he's out. *Berlusconi is about the only exception to this. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Why would Putin want to take a chance on trump Stop right there. He's not "taking a chance." He's got Trump in the bag. That's exactly the point. Zerowone said: » 10 members of the electoral college want a briefing from intelligence officials on the investigation. Quote: "The Electors require to know from the intelligence community whether there are ongoing investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or associates and the Russian government interference in the election, the scope of those investigations, how far those investigations may have reached and who is involved in these investigations. We further require a briefing on all investigative findings, as these matters directly impact the core factors in our deliberations of whether Mr. Trump is fit to serve as President of the United States" Should be noted the breakdown of the 10 is 9 Democrats and 1 Republican. This non contribution of mine from page 2 is apparently a hot topic in the fake and non facts I don't like cycle No matter what is said "it's a lie" no matter how much proof is given "it's a forgery" and no matter who provides said proof "they aren't trustworthy!"
No proof will ever be sufficient for some people. Offline
Posts: 2442
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Yatenkou said: » Even if it is cliche, Ben was a great pick because he's a success story who grew up in the government housing. I think he'll really do some good for the people there. Ben Carson grew up in a house, he will be great for that position! Well I guess not, but it still baffles me that if we didn't have that Electoral College, Trump would have 100% lost.
Anna Ruthven said: » No matter what is said "it's a lie" no matter how much proof is given "it's a forgery" and no matter who provides said proof "they aren't trustworthy!" No proof will ever be sufficient for some people. Your post is a forgery Offline
Posts: 2442
Yatenkou said: » Well I guess not, but it still baffles me that if we didn't have that Electoral College, Trump would have 100% lost. Well the Electoral College was designed so someone like Trump couldn't take office. Offline
Posts: 9772
Ramyrez said: » "I'm like, you know, smart"- the Donald Offline
Posts: 2442
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Why would Putin want to take a chance on trump when the Clinton's are always for sale and already bought and paid for? Hello uranium deal. Why buy someone out when you can just manipulate a weak opponent for free. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » forgery "The government is wasting money" "I don't believe yuo!" *bashes flail into misbeliever's head* "Truth will find a way." *journalists stands above the corpse of the person with the weapon soaked in the blood* Another news delivered! Valefor.Sehachan said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » forgery "The government is wasting money" "I don't believe yuo!" *bashes flail into misbeliever's head* "Truth will find a way." *journalists stands above the corpse of the person with the weapon soaked in the blood* Another news delivered! "The Journalistic Inquisition" eliroo said: » Yatenkou said: » Well I guess not, but it still baffles me that if we didn't have that Electoral College, Trump would have 100% lost. Well the Electoral College was designed so someone like Trump couldn't take office. I hope you're not being serious, because that's one of the stupidest talking points that I've seen since the election. eliroo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Why would Putin want to take a chance on trump when the Clinton's are always for sale and already bought and paid for? Hello uranium deal. Why buy someone out when you can just manipulate a weak opponent for free. Devil you know vs the devil you don't. Yatenkou said: » And we all know how that's gonna end ...? Wrong ending..? Hey US intelligence though without any doubt Sadam had WMD. I guess they're never wrong and never politicized?
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|