Random Politics & Religion #13

That's one single request for one single email. The request was rejected by the FBI. So calm down with the conspiracies.

So accepting money from registered foreign agents who are working as lobbyist is ok but someone signing up or being signed up to received emails from Trumps campaign is bad?

Like the only reason she is getting those emails is because someone put her email on the list, that is dumb.

You do realize that investigations can be reopened, right?

Just because it was closed with recommendation to not prosecute doesn't make the party innocent. Especially now that evidence is being presented that the investigation itself was compromised in benefit of the investigated.

I mean, who destroys evidence in the middle of the investigation? Who makes immunity plea bargains before the investigation starts? Who does such a sub-standard investigation, ignoring obvious points and methodologies, to suit the desires of the investigated?

That "investigation" is a sham and just the acts of the investigation dictate possible collusion. And now that the original evidence was destroyed to protect a few people, the investigators need to be charged with conspiracy to commit fraud. When is that going to happen?

Like what? And you have to prove it to be false too.

Of course it has been, That is literally what both parties are trying to do with either candidate. At least this investigation is related to a serious issue.

Also the oversight committee could still rule to re-open the investigation.

There is actually a very strong case for Perjury as the information the provided under oath was contradicted with other testimonies and information. Proving lying vs. ignorance is pretty hard. Either way if she was that ignorant do you really want this lady to run our country?

Blinding motorists is generally not a good idea.

It's a document classified by the FBI, hence why the request was made to the FBI. They had the clearance, they just rejected it.

Hundreds of European politicians have received solicitations from the Trump campaign. This is not an isolated incident.

There really isn't a case for perjury either which has already been examined...

I was hoping it would move us past the email topic... it's boring me to tears.

Whining about not getting your way under the guise of conspiracy. Basically taken straight from the Trump playbook.

Well, if you prefer, we can get discuss things taken from the liberal double-standard playbook.

You are forgetting it wasn't a request to the FBI but a person in the FBI, that person did not have the clearance since the email belonged to the CTD.

Uh ok, you are just trying to redefine words and definitions to fit KN's narrative. A request was made, nothing happened. You can twist the words of rejected around as much as you want, but the end result was: Nothing happened. No collusion took place.

No collusion took place

Full Definition of collusion
: secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose

I'll take something from your playbook then... Your nuts if you think double standards only apply on the liberal side...

Well, if you prefer, we can get discuss things taken from the liberal double-standard playbook.

Baseless and misinformed.

​DONALD J. TRUMP’S FIVE-POINT PLAN FOR ETHICS REFORM

“It’s Time To Drain The Swamp In Washington, D.C. That’s Why I’m Proposing A Package Of Ethics Reforms To Make Our Government Honest Once Again.” - Donald J. Trump


First: I am going to re-institute a 5-year ban on all executive branch officials lobbying the government for 5 years after they leave government service. I am going to ask Congress to pass this ban into law so that it cannot be lifted by executive order.

Second: I am going to ask Congress to institute its own 5-year ban on lobbying by former members of Congress and their staffs.

Third: I am going to expand the definition of lobbyist so we close all the loopholes that former government officials use by labeling themselves consultants and advisors when we all know they are lobbyists.

Fourth: I am going to issue a lifetime ban against senior executive branch officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

Fifth: I am going to ask Congress to pass a campaign finance reform that prevents registered foreign lobbyists from raising money in American elections.

Not only will we end our government corruption, but we will end the economic stagnation.

There was cooperation as [redacted] clearly tried to pursue declassification but lacked clearance

Where is the evidence of Mr Redacted "clearly trying to pursue declassification?" As far as I could tell, Mr. Redacted received the request from State, notified someone higher up the chain, they said no, he replied with no.

KN's speculations are based off of information provided.

Disagree with him all you want, but none of what he says is baseless or misinformed.

If anything you are probably being the misinformed one as you choose to be ignorant of the topic and dismiss it.

Backread the last 4 pages I missed...you guys are being even worse than usual.

Kill #13 pls.

Baseless as in there's no factual basis. C'mon, Mr. Dictionary.

That would be pursuing it knowing that a quid pro quo was offered. If he didn't pursue it he would have never notified anyone else and rejected it on the spot.

Anyway, lets move on since you want to blatantly ignore evidence.