Post deleted by User.
Science Vs Science Fiction
Science vs Science Fiction
eslim said: »
i'm gonna take 5 mins out of my life and use alittle magic..
earth's gravitational orbit = here
nvm, google is always lying- ***googley googlie googliness supper.
nvm, google is always lying- ***
...not Gravity telling me Magnetics > Gravity
This whole Thread from Page1 to Now has drained and exhausted the living ***out of me...
...I cant Stop now. I will find out.
Reddit not answering me ><
Eslim I couldnt understand you even if I tried
I need simple answers. Which will allow me to form bigger questions.
Magnetic Moon
That is SO *** interesting.
Eslim I couldnt understand you even if I tried
I need simple answers. Which will allow me to form bigger questions.
Magnetic Moon
Quote:
The magnetic field of the Moon is very weak in comparison to that of the Earth. Other major differences are that the Moon does not currently have a dipolar magnetic field (as would be generated by a geodynamo in its core) and the varying magnetization that is present is almost entirely crustal in origin.
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
And then use your bookshelf to tell your daughter quantum data using the second hand of a watch.
Josiahkf said: »
Akson you really need to watch the movie interstellar, twice.
You will likely learn a lot and be greatly entertained.
You will likely learn a lot and be greatly entertained.
Josiahkf said: »
When he said the Sun's highest gravitational range is 82 million miles
Josiahkf said: »
I didn't follow the math and discussion you were having, but I'm referring to whatever the highest calculated range was in which the sun's gravity can have tangeable effects on objects that approach.
Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
Siren.Akson said: »
Josiahkf said: »
I didn't follow the math and discussion you were having, but I'm referring to whatever the highest calculated range was in which the sun's gravity can have tangeable effects on objects that approach.
Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
Picture it like a huge invisible sphere around the sun in which all the planets orbit and the distance past them
So in the distance past Pluto where the sun's gravity is still strong enough to cause orbiting, we might have more tiny planets waiting to be discovered. Or it might just be empy space until the sun's force gets weaker and weaker. That's why we search the night sky for information and send probes.
Mercury - 36m Miles
Pluto - 5b Miles
I dont see anything explaining why Mercury has not yet been engulfed by the Sun ><
While keeping Pluto in Orbit as well w/ the Sun...
Mercury should not exist IMO if the Sun's gravitational is that strong. That or Pluto needs to gtfo... it's a dwarf anyways
Quote:
Mercury is the smallest and innermost planet in the Solar System. Its orbital period (about 88 Earth days) is less than any other planet in the Solar System. After one orbit, Mercury has rotated 1.5 times, so after two complete orbits the same hemisphere is again illuminated.
Quote:
Pluto's orbital period is 248 years. Pluto's rotation period, its day, is equal to 6.39 Earth days.
I dont see anything explaining why Mercury has not yet been engulfed by the Sun ><
Quote:
Mercury
- mean radius 2439.7km = 0.3829 Earths
- volume 6.083 x 10^10 km3 = 0.054 Earths
- mass 3.3022 x 10^23 kg = 0.055 Earths
Pluto
- mean radius 1195km = 0.19 Earths
- volume 7.15 x 10^9 km3 = 0.0066 Earths
- mass 1.305 x 10^22 kg = 0.0021 Earths
- mean radius 2439.7km = 0.3829 Earths
- volume 6.083 x 10^10 km3 = 0.054 Earths
- mass 3.3022 x 10^23 kg = 0.055 Earths
Pluto
- mean radius 1195km = 0.19 Earths
- volume 7.15 x 10^9 km3 = 0.0066 Earths
- mass 1.305 x 10^22 kg = 0.0021 Earths
Mercury should not exist IMO if the Sun's gravitational is that strong. That or Pluto needs to gtfo... it's a dwarf anyways
If that is True.
What keeps Mercury going so fast?
Gravity pulls inward not aroundward.. (which aint even a word)
Shouldnt Mercury slow down? Our Space Shuttles 30k miles/hour just to not fall. They use fuel.
Magnetics? Yet even that should pull inward ><
Quote:
Mercury speeds around the sun every 88 Earth days, traveling through space at nearly 112,000 mph (180,000 kph), faster than any other planet.
Gravity pulls inward not aroundward.. (which aint even a word)
Shouldnt Mercury slow down? Our Space Shuttles 30k miles/hour just to not fall. They use fuel.
Magnetics? Yet even that should pull inward ><
Bismarck.Josiahfk said: »
it's not that it needs a fuel source to move, it's just that there is no wind resistance to slow mercury down. It forever keeps moving at it's original speed (until it hits something again) and instead of flying off into space, gravity from the sun keeps it orbiting.
like the feather and the bowling ball being dropped in a vacuum that you watched a video about.
like the feather and the bowling ball being dropped in a vacuum that you watched a video about.
Josiahkf said: »
so we could have had trillions of planets over the lifetime of our star, but only the current 8 we have happened to be going the right speed and passed the sun at the right distance to be pulled into an orbit.
I believe what you're saying is True. I just think there is more to the equation. Gravity is not capable of deciding which Direction planets travel revolving our Sun and every other Star in the Universe. Is it?
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.