Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Thread |
||
|
Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Thread
Anna Ruthven said: » I don't usually topic ban over profanity in images unless it's done repeatedly or obviously intentional. I will, if you vote Grumpy for mod 2016. If you are tired of Crazy Anna and Obama creating ISIS in a meth lab vote for me! Or maybe you 2nd amendment people can do something about it!? Grumpy Cat said: » Or maybe you 2nd amendment people can do something about it!? Anna Ruthven said: » I don't usually topic ban over profanity in images unless it's done repeatedly or obviously intentional. Give LG, at least, has a history of repeatedly doing it in a fashion that is borderline hostile, I'd think there's some grounds for consideration. But maybe I'm just bias against idiotic conspiracy theory horseshit. Grumpy Cat said: » Anna Ruthven said: » I don't usually topic ban over profanity in images unless it's done repeatedly or obviously intentional. I will, if you vote Grumpy for mod 2016. If you are tired of Crazy Anna and Obama creating ISIS in a meth lab vote for me! Or maybe you 2nd amendment people can do something about it!? Yea, Maybe we can vote, protest or Rally. Effin Media scum sheep. Making everything about them and their intentions. Imma second amendment all over the place. Ramyrez said: » Anna Ruthven said: » I don't usually topic ban over profanity in images unless it's done repeatedly or obviously intentional. Give LG, at least, has a history of repeatedly doing it in a fashion that is borderline hostile, I'd think there's some grounds for consideration. But maybe I'm just bias against idiotic conspiracy theory horseshit. eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. Anna Ruthven said: » There are actually worse people going on track record alone. Like I said. I'm willing to admit a bias viewing on my part in light of his moronic content. eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. Just making sure you know... the 2nd amendment is not the right to masturbate in public....
[+]
[+]
[+]
Ramyrez said: » eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. Ramyrez said: » It would certainly render the Republic much safer, despite a little more...sticky... Not so sure about that. But who knows, maybe if we were raised in those conditions we may not want to bash people in the face with a bat if they start jerking it beside you on a park bench. Ramyrez said: » Anna Ruthven said: » I don't usually topic ban over profanity in images unless it's done repeatedly or obviously intentional. Give LG, at least, has a history of repeatedly doing it in a fashion that is borderline hostile, I'd think there's some grounds for consideration. But maybe I'm just bias against idiotic conspiracy theory horseshit. Are you really just trying to get someone banned because they disagree with you? eliroo said: » See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. You have no clue what you're even commenting upon. eliroo said: » Are you really just trying to get someone banned because they disagree with you? And confirming it. To be clear for you, no, that isn't what's happening at all. eliroo said: » Ramyrez said: » eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. That's one reason why you don't need a gun if you're crazy. I speak from experience, a crazy cousin has shot at me before. Anna Ruthven said: » eliroo said: » Ramyrez said: » eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. That's one reason why you don't need a gun if you're crazy. I speak from experience, a crazy cousin has shot at me before. Bloodrose said: » Anna Ruthven said: » eliroo said: » Ramyrez said: » eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. That's one reason why you don't need a gun if you're crazy. I speak from experience, a crazy cousin has shot at me before. Anna Ruthven said: » The reason he was shooting at me was because no one woke him up on the first day of deer season. Full disclosure is necessary, GB. You have to acknowledge that is a fairly egregious sin if you're from huntin' parts. Anna Ruthven said: » eliroo said: » Ramyrez said: » eliroo said: » Imma second amendment all over the place. See, this is the problem once you out yourself as a conspiracy theory whacko. We can't assume you're joking and have to take this as a valid threat. See this is the problem, once you out yourself as someone who takes things to seriously and thinks that second amendment people are the ones doing the shootings and just becomes hard to take anything you say seriously. That's one reason why you don't need a gun if you're crazy. I speak from experience, a crazy cousin has shot at me before. It isn't the people supporting the 2nd that are the ones doing the shootings. Those are the people that have a hobby they enjoy. A Crazy person doesn't have time to support a silly amendment, they will just grab a gun and shoot. The 2nd Amendment people are following the law and fighting for their rights, this is also the reason why Trumps statement couldn't possibly be inciting violence. If anything it incites the ignorant sheep to think he was. eliroo said: » If anything it incites the ignorant sheep to think he was. See, this is the problem. It's a problem Trump has, it's a problem many of his followers have. Nobody thinks Trump is dumb enough to blatantly say "go shoot someone." But as a politician you have to understand the power your words carry, and be aware that you are culpable if someone who isn't in their mind takes them the wrong way. Yes, most people who own guns are responsible gun owners. However, a small minority are crazy ***' lunatics who read in that "Hey! She's gonna take your rights! Shoot her!" The problem isn't that he meant that. He may or may not have, we don't know. But the problem is it's a blatantly irresponsible thing to say because it suggests to the easily-influenced that maybe, just maybe, that is what he's saying. But don't believe me, sure. I'm just a guy with a degree in journalism and public relations who spent many years studying not just what message to deliver, but how to deliver it for maximum effect. Trump knows exactly what he's doing every step of the way. The man is a master of ***. It's really just a question of whether he thinks he's making a bold gamble to win, or whether he's trying to hedge his bets to lose. Ramyrez said: » Trump knows exactly what he's doing every step of the way. Which, to clarify, is why what he said on the topic was dangerous. He knows bloody well that a handful of people could take it in a way that seems like incitement to shoot someone. But he also knows that it would whip the left and the media into a frenzy regarding the irresponsibility of what he said. He's gambling 1) that no one will try to successfully shoot anyone based on his words and 2) he'll get a bunch of publicity out of it. So kudos to him for, at least so far, being right on both accounts. On a side note, outside of gun regulations thorough mental health checks should be pretty much regulation to help people.
The problem is such a system could easily be abused. I think before we put such a system in place we need to have officials who actually care about the people and not a paycheck. This is pretty much impossible at this point. Corruption and Politics are pretty much the same words.
[+]
Ramyrez said: » Anna Ruthven said: » The reason he was shooting at me was because no one woke him up on the first day of deer season. Full disclosure is necessary, GB. You have to acknowledge that is a fairly egregious sin if you're from huntin' parts. He did finally admit to shooting "once" but in reality he shot 19 times. (Went through a box, dropping round on the trail, 19)
[+]
eliroo said: » This is pretty much impossible at this point. Corruption and Politics are pretty much the same words. This has always been the case. Always. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
