Valefor.Sehachan said: »
*backreads* Some people really need to educate themselves about the meaning of ideologies and study some philosophy instead of spewing demented stuff about their perceived notions.
Random Politics & Religion #08
Random Politics & Religion #08
If everyone did that, nobody would say anything...ever again.
[+]
You know why some people need to educated themselves this is why:
YouTube Video Placeholder
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
If it's ok for private enterprises (that is what the RNC/DNC are, they are not government entities) to have to reveal their emails, what's next? Private citizens (aka you and me) have to do the same?
Russia hacking into the DNC = bad.
Just like people hacking into Sony's email system is also = bad. But you don't seem to complain about that, do you?
Russia hacking into the DNC = bad.
Just like people hacking into Sony's email system is also = bad. But you don't seem to complain about that, do you?
There probably are people out there that lauded other hacks and disapproved of this one or approved of this one and disapproved of another one showing their opinion is more self serving than a disapproval of approval of the action...
I didn't once say they had to make these types of correspondence public or make a push saying that they should be required to so yeah...
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
You just described all of Clinton's campaign. Any thoughts about Trump's?
Yeah, it's called look back at the man's history before and during the election cycle.
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
If it's ok for private enterprises (that is what the RNC/DNC are, they are not government entities) to have to reveal their emails, what's next? Private citizens (aka you and me) have to do the same?
Russia hacking into the DNC = bad.
Just like people hacking into Sony's email system is also = bad. But you don't seem to complain about that, do you?
Russia hacking into the DNC = bad.
Just like people hacking into Sony's email system is also = bad. But you don't seem to complain about that, do you?
There probably are people out there that lauded other hacks and disapproved of this one or approved of this one and disapproved of another one showing their opinion is more self serving than a disapproval of approval of the action...
I didn't once say they had to make these types of correspondence public or make a push saying that they should be required to so yeah...
Now, if transparency was only directed towards political action groups, then some might be on board, but even then, that may create a slippery slope.
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
You just described all of Clinton's campaign. Any thoughts about Trump's?
Yeah, it's called look back at the
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Is there any proof that it was Russia that did the actual hacking? ...
Quote:
...
Private-sector cyber security investigators hired by the DNC concluded that hackers working for the Russian government were behind the year-long breach of the DNC. The investigation found intrusions by two Russian hacking groups....
The FBI and other US agencies involved haven't yet officially attributed the DNC attack to Russian government hackers. But evidence gathered by the FBI so far points to groups that are known to US counter-intelligence for carrying out intrusions for the Russian government, the officials briefed on the probe say....
It's possible that other hackers took advantage of the DNC's vulnerabilities and also stole information, US officials said. But the intrusion so far appears to bear the hallmarks of a Russian intelligence operation....
Private-sector cyber security investigators hired by the DNC concluded that hackers working for the Russian government were behind the year-long breach of the DNC. The investigation found intrusions by two Russian hacking groups....
The FBI and other US agencies involved haven't yet officially attributed the DNC attack to Russian government hackers. But evidence gathered by the FBI so far points to groups that are known to US counter-intelligence for carrying out intrusions for the Russian government, the officials briefed on the probe say....
It's possible that other hackers took advantage of the DNC's vulnerabilities and also stole information, US officials said. But the intrusion so far appears to bear the hallmarks of a Russian intelligence operation....
CNN
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
You just described all of Clinton's campaign. Any thoughts about Trump's?
Yeah, it's called look back at the
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
[+]
If I remember when I get home (80% chance I won't) I'll link a good video someone on my Facebook page shared. Very non-partisan video.
Hits all the attacked points of each candidate.
They're exactly the same, and both 100% true, for each candidate.
Hits all the attacked points of each candidate.
They're exactly the same, and both 100% true, for each candidate.
Side note, latest 4 national polls:
CBS News: +1 Trump
CNN/ORC: +3 Trump
LA Times/USC: +4 Trump
Gravis: +2 Trump
RCP Overall: +0.2 Trump
For everyone who thought the Republican convention was a disaster, Trump got the expected bump anyway. Even Nate Silver is saying that Trump would likely win if the election were today. The ball's in the Democrats' court now, and the battle is uphill with the email revelation. Good luck.
CBS News: +1 Trump
CNN/ORC: +3 Trump
LA Times/USC: +4 Trump
Gravis: +2 Trump
RCP Overall: +0.2 Trump
For everyone who thought the Republican convention was a disaster, Trump got the expected bump anyway. Even Nate Silver is saying that Trump would likely win if the election were today. The ball's in the Democrats' court now, and the battle is uphill with the email revelation. Good luck.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Side note, latest 4 national polls:
CBS News: +1 Trump
CNN/ORC: +3 Trump
LA Times/USC: +4 Trump
Gravis: +2 Trump
RCP Overall: +0.2 Trump
For everyone who thought the Republican convention was a disaster, Trump got the expected bump anyway. Even Nate Silver is saying that Trump would likely win if the election were today. The ball's in the Democrats' court now, and the battle is uphill with the email revelation. Good luck.
CBS News: +1 Trump
CNN/ORC: +3 Trump
LA Times/USC: +4 Trump
Gravis: +2 Trump
RCP Overall: +0.2 Trump
For everyone who thought the Republican convention was a disaster, Trump got the expected bump anyway. Even Nate Silver is saying that Trump would likely win if the election were today. The ball's in the Democrats' court now, and the battle is uphill with the email revelation. Good luck.
Now see, I get that to a point.
But...at the same time. The Republican platform isn't changing.
Are people really going to vote for a ton of things they don't believe in because the person delivering the platform is objectively terrible?
And, if so, well.
We either need two new candidates and/or Johnson in a landslide.
Ramyrez said: »
The frustrating thing is that there basically isn't a candidate for any true liberals/progressive in this race
Totally gonna win.
Though she's even worse than Bernie about pandering to the *** hippies.
EAT YOUR GENETICALLY MODIFIED GRANOLA AND DEAL WITH IT, WHITE-GIRL-WITH-DREADS.
EAT YOUR GENETICALLY MODIFIED GRANOLA AND DEAL WITH IT, WHITE-GIRL-WITH-DREADS.
[+]
Ramyrez said: »
The Republican platform isn't changing.
I should change after the election but for it to change now? Not a good idea.
At least it's not like the democrat's "outrage at whatever event happened that day" platform it's been doing for the past few decades.
Ramyrez said: »
We either need two new candidates and/or Johnson in a landslide.
This will be the third presidential election in a row where I'm not voting for the person, I'm voting against his opponent. And I think that's what most of America has been doing since Obama/McCain.
Give all the faults to Bush all you want, but at least I was voting for the guy, not against Gore or Kerry.
Also, every time a person posts an edit post in P&R, an angel get's his wings.
ThanksObama Rooks!
Thanks
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Ramyrez said: »
pandering to the *** hippies
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Both are terrible !
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Fundamentally flawed question. They are mutually exclusive!
Frankly, I'll call the girls because they're young enough that they won't break a hip when Slimer accidentally knocks them over.
fonewear said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Both are terrible !
I don't agree but I appreciate the candor.
[+]
fonewear said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Both are terrible !
Anyone who dares say that Bill Murray's Ghostbusters is horrible needs a swift kick in the gonads!
Another Angel get's his wings.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
fonewear said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
And with that minor change it applies to Clinton. Any thoughts on Trump's campaign that can only be applied to him?
He's out of touch with reality....damn, applies to Clinton.
He doesn't give a ***about the little people....crap, also applies to Clinton.
He's donated to the democrats before...***...also Clinton.
He is a corrupt ***....crap, Clinton too....
Both are terrible !
Anyone who dares say that Bill Murray's Ghostbusters is horrible needs a swift kick in the gonads!
Actually I don't think I've ever watched either movie. But mostly commenting on the new one cause of the feminist propaganda.
fonewear said: »
feminist propaganda.
See, I actually don't feel like there's been that much feminist propaganda. At least not from the producers.
Just a lot of hate from the stormfront types about "damn people ruining their childhood by letting women be ghostbusters."
Also, the original guys all signed off on it, specifically the creators and rights holders so...
To those guys I say, don't go see it and get a life, or sit and whine. Your choice neckbeards. Nobody gives a ***what you think.
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.