Random Politics & Religion #08

Let me deconstruct this


*** shaming is something women do to other women, men like ***.


This is thought control. The rejected party has a right to think whatever the *** they want to think, good or bad.


This one is just plainly wrong. Men will notice an attractive women in a revealing outfit. This is basic biology. Compliments are a form of positive reinforcement, they aren't negative. Furthermore men can't read minds, we don't know if a compliment is wanted or unwanted until after it's given.

Now I'm going to really break that last one down. What she's really saying is "I don't unattractive men noticing me". An attractive male noticing her and giving her a compliment is a desired result, she would blush and flirt back. An unattractive male doing the same action would be called creepy and get socially rejected. Same female, same situation, same action, the out difference is the attractiveness of the male.

Again this is basic biology, humans are programmed to respond favorably to members of the opposite sex who are attractive / fertile. This response is centered in the subconscious (oh gee that again) and is a way of promotion our species to continue itself by making lots of babies. Seeing how most of you insist on remaining ignorant on the source of this behavior, its simply not a reasonable expectation that the average human would be able to effectively suppress and manipulate this biological response.

Tell that to our founding fathers. We went to war when non-aggressive actions weren't working.

Nor for the Civil Rights movement. MLK Jr. pushed the non-aggressive envelope as best he could until he died, but progress was slow going. After he died, the people that took up the mantle after him were far less non-aggressive and ***started getting done at a much faster rate.

My second message was at Mr. "I can only be with docile women" Savael.

Admittedly pointless, because he can't deal with people not bowing before his superiority complex and blocked me a few weeks ago.

No if you don't have something nice to say ... say it on the internet !

I don't really think those people in question are so much anti-feminist as they are simply misogynists. It's the "all men are rapists" stuff that strikes me as funny. Let's accuse an entire gender of a serious crime and expect to be taken seriously. I still say that such rhetoric is a slap in the face to anyone who has actually been raped. The word rape is becoming too common and it's losing it's impact, it should never lose it's impact.

Tell the third wave feminism it's going to be ok you don't have to hate men all the time !

You have the cause effect reversed.

Third wave feminists got super militant, super angry and all about "all men are just rapists in hiding". The whole "check your unearned male privilege before speaking to me" type ***. This kind of angry offensive misandry got shoved down young men's throats in universities and eventually those men responded. That response was anger and rejection of feminist ideology. The sisterhood united and all sorts of ***started. And like radical feminism, some in the mens rights movement radicalized but unlike radical feminist those individuals have very little power, hell MRM in general has almost zero power because you know, "*** men".

Anyhow got errands but I'm sure the radical feminists will be all fire and pitchforks.

I'll say something women don't want to hear but should. Men and women aren't equal and they never will be.

And there is nothing wrong with that.

Do you know what Misogyny is? Misandry?

Get a good understanding of those before throwing them out like labels.

Persistence, not anger. For a personal example, if I mod someone and they come to me, call me a fascist, a Nazi, etc. they probably aren't going to do anything but be ignored. If, however, they will come and talk it out in a civilized manner, I'm more likely to tweak things to help them.

Anger is off-putting.

Wait your a mod ?

You'll have to forgive me I can't read.

And I get that. But what do you do when someone in your position has absolutely no desire to help, regardless of your disposition?

What happens is you get sick of it and decide to push the issue. And after you have to do this 90184907127319 times? You start giving zero *** about how you treat the next person because you have no reason to believe this person is going to be any better than the others before them.

You're *

No, I joined a gang, our colors are green and our sign is some ***from Naruto.

Yeah, I get that but to that next person, they are the first one you've spoke with on the issue. If you're speaking rudely, no they won't help you.

Finally someone that gets it !

She is a professional victim and being a victim pays pretty well it seems !

I'm not saying it's good behavior. But this '' feminism stuff didn't come out of nowhere.

Well, it isn't helping the cause. So good luck in your cause with the loudest voices treating people that way.

As long as you label yourself a feminist be prepared to endure all that comes with that.

No woman has to be part of a group or ideology.

I should also add that despite my thoughts on Anita Sarkeesian, she keeps it together and doesn't project her point through rage.

She is a provocateur. Tries to get people to respond angrily then uses their rage for profit.

That's what Milo Yiannopoulos is also.

I thought Milo was a Greek yogurt...guess that is a real person.

Well, when the opposition is shouting just as loudly...

If they are shouting at feminists, I highly doubt they are in any photo help get things done.

Position, not photo.

Your "complements" are never wanted. Just be happy that you don't live in a stand your ground state and most women aren't armed.

"I felt threatened...."

And as to what we want. Rape is NEVER what we want. And there was a serial rapist in Seattle who specialized in women older than I.

Perhaps the issue is equating the entire philosophy with the loudest and most extreme elements.