Presidential Address. |
||
|
Presidential address.
Sounds like he said the only way we can defeat Islamic terrorism in the USA is to welcome them with open arms.
YouTube Video Placeholder Oh and I was unaware people on the terrorist watch list could walk right into a gun store and buy a gun. He also forgot to mention that California gun laws failed to stop this tragedy while he believes the entire USA needs more gun laws like California. Not to mention we all know he does not take his intelligence briefing every morning.
[+]
Altimaomega said: » Sounds like he said the only way we can defeat Islamic terrorism in the USA is to welcome them with open arms. Then you weren't even listening.
[+]
Altimaomega said: » Oh and I was unaware people on the terrorist watch list could walk right into a gun store and buy a gun. Glad you learned something. Its a current fact of life in the USA. You can't get on a plane, but you can walk into a gun store and buy a gun.
[+]
[+]
Just bought a couple more AR15 lowers for 40 bucks a pop. Thanks Obama <_<;
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
[+]
Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread?
[+]
Altimaomega said: » After listening to his address there was a brief mention and undertone in his statement that the American way would be unaffected and that they would not change their ideals and policies, and that they would not abandon the people in that country as that would be falling into the terrorists hands. Mentioned Items:
Things they don't wish to do.
Altimaomega, do you have a timestamp for your crackpipe conspiracy ***? Or should I just google Alien Abductions? 
[+]
Jassik said: » Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread? I think its cute, especially since he sucks at creating threads. Jassik said: » Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread?
[+]
[+]
Jassik said: » Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread? The President addressing the nation doesn't deserve it own thread debate really? Why do you insist on harassing my topics because of something that happened a year ago that I served ban time for and I'm STILL topic banned? An excessive amount of ban time I might add for barley bannable behavior. Could of swore you are one of those people that advocate for tolerance. Seems like you only want tolerance when it only affects you and yours.
[+]
Altimaomega said: » Jassik said: » Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread? The President addressing the nation doesn't deserve it own thread debate really? Why do you insist on harassing my topics because of something that happened a year ago that I served ban time for and I'm STILL topic banned? An excessive amount of ban time I might add for barley bannable behavior. Could of swore you are one of those people that advocate for tolerance. Seems like you only want tolerance when it only affects you and yours. Uh, the President makes dozens of addresses every year, sometimes more. Does that mean we need to have over 100 threads about Obama's addresses to the nation? No It's not some personal vendetta, either. This topic doesn't warrant a thread of its own, and the only reason it now has one is because you had something to say and aren't allowed to post in RPR. It's not even a good-faith discussion, you just made a thread with the speech and made some petty anti-obama statements. It's a ***-post, plain and simple.
[+]
Misplace an E and everyone loses their minds.
And posts amusing pictures.
[+]
Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Jassik said: » Do we really need to have a new thread about every single thing you want to comment on just because you couldn't behave in the RPR thread? The President addressing the nation doesn't deserve it own thread debate really? Why do you insist on harassing my topics because of something that happened a year ago that I served ban time for and I'm STILL topic banned? An excessive amount of ban time I might add for barley bannable behavior. Could of swore you are one of those people that advocate for tolerance. Seems like you only want tolerance when it only affects you and yours. Uh, the President makes dozens of addresses every year, sometimes more. Does that mean we need to have over 100 threads about Obama's addresses to the nation? No It's not some personal vendetta, either. This topic doesn't warrant a thread of its own, and the only reason it now has one is because you had something to say and aren't allowed to post in RPR. It's not even a good-faith discussion, you just made a thread with the speech and made some petty anti-obama statements. It's a ***-post, plain and simple. My bad. The last time that Obama spoke from the Oval Office was to announce the official end of US military involvement in Iraq in late 2010. Far cry from dozens.. Does symbolism mean nothing anymore? And why can I not have an anti-obama thread? It's not in the forum rules anywhere, the 1st amendment is still intact.. last time I checked. =
Altimaomega said: » Misplace an E and everyone loses their minds. You've still failed to answer my question. Doesn't everyone love made up conspiracy theories?
[+]
Altimaomega said: » The undertone was more about not changing a way of life because extremists try to make him so, and then he Pointedly addresses increasing the difficulty to even enter the country which is in direct countenance to your argument. the undertone, and don't misunderstand my meaning, was about staying American and not changing their culture into one of pure hatred (Which is laughable because 'murica and yes that's how the world sees American's these days.), that is not a statement about opening the flood gates seeing as he pointedly said about doing things to make it harder to get in, and he's addressing the Gun Restrictions for the country which you said he ignored, which he clearly didn't. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Doesn't everyone love made up conspiracy theories? No I love Chicken and Vodka. My 2 true loves.
[+]
Shiva.Viciousss said: » Doesn't everyone love made up conspiracy theories? I dunno you'd have to ask Con since he is the one that made it up. Altimaomega said: » My bad. The last time that Obama spoke from the Oval Office was to announce the official end of US military involvement in Iraq in late 2010. Some presidents address from the Oval Office regularly, some don't. Obama's done it 3 times, Reagan did it like 23, FDR did 33, and not all of them were even important addresses. He did the OSB address, the Ferguson riots address, and every other ISIS address outside the office. The location isn't particularly relevant and it sure doesn't make this topic any more worthwhile.
[+]
[+]
Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » My bad. The last time that Obama spoke from the Oval Office was to announce the official end of US military involvement in Iraq in late 2010. Some presidents address from the Oval Office regularly, some don't. Obama's done it 3 times, Reagan did it like 23, FDR did 33, and not all of them were even important addresses. He did the OSB address, the Ferguson riots address, and every other ISIS address outside the office. The location isn't particularly relevant and it sure doesn't make this topic any more worthwhile. Recent presidents have not.. G.W.Bush only gave 6. In the 12yrs from G.Bush to Clinton they gave almost as much as Reagan did 2 a yr.. So from the First Bush to now 1.2 Oval office addresses a year. Still a far cry from dozens a year. Altimaomega said: » And why can I not have an anti-obama thread? It's not in the forum rules anywhere, the 1st amendment is still intact.. last time I checked. I don't believe that the 1st amendment actually has any ties to the Internet and by creating your character you agree to Terms and Conditions were you actually waive some rights to "Personal Freedoms" in the interests of other laws affiliated with the Internet. Read the small print.
[+]
|
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
