|
Bf stabbed for eating thanksgiving meal to early
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-12-02 13:44:57
That is the foundation of feminism. If you don't agree you are wrong. They don't want to hear dissenting opinions.
Or that merely represents stubborn zealots you'll find in everything from cooking to gaming politics, religion and beyond. People generally dislike change and feminism challenges individuals to make a personal and social change.
Resistance is to be expected. You can safely ignore the Tumblr goons and read some academic feminism. You might learn something!
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 13:50:24
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »You can safely ignore the Tumblr goons and read some academic feminism. You might learn something!
But Tumblr goons communicate through readily-digested, quick, easy-to-judge images and gifs. It's so much easier to get your validation that way, regardless of your belief system.
Reading sounds like work.
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-12-02 13:53:21
This little graphic explains all you need to know:
The only reason you'd have no problem with first and second wave feminists by that infographic is because the battle has been 'won'. Safely tucked away in the past where it isn't our problem.
Or has it? Wage gaps, reproductive freedom and ability for women to enter male fields is still a unfinished thing. It's very similar to the critics who feel that once civil rights was obtained for blacks everything else is just 'whining' to some extent as if people suddenly change overnight once some ink dries on paper.
Today's feminists were yesterdays suffragists. Todays MRAs are yesterdays 'get back in the kitchen...ists' We should do well to stop romanticizing the past as if there aren't always extremists and moderates in every movement ever.
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-12-02 13:57:55
interesting timing...
after reading bloodrose's post; i just saw a commercial talking about how women are victims of domestic violence. And how there organization is set up to help WOMEN. And the usually 'please help the women' rhetoric...
And while im all for stopping domestic violence, i couldn't help but notice that they are set up, targeting, and only helping women. Any man that's a victim can go f*** themselves'
What's stopping men from championing the cause of male abuse rather than jerking off around a table about an organization for female abuse? Are you telling me that women might want to aid other women as a matter of personal interest? No-fuppin-way. Just wait till I tell the Asian small business council they're a bunch of racists.
Men could even ally yourself with that female abuse organization to pool resources! But I forgot, every female organization despises men or something spooky.
[+]
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 14:03:57
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »The only reason you'd have no problem with first and second wave feminists by that infographic
I'm not saying it's Fon, but I'm relatively sure there's at least one or two regulars on the forum, if not this thread, who do have a problem with the first two waves. :p
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6052
By Leviathan.Comeatmebro 2014-12-02 14:06:22
YouTube Video Placeholder
this is what a feminist looks like
Quote: Wage gaps, reproductive freedom and ability for women to enter male fields is still a unfinished thing. Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
How do women lack reproductive freedom, exactly? They have to go to the next state over to get an abortion in a few cases? Still waiting for men to have an option to get out of an unwanted child, anywhere.
Pretending women can't enter 'male fields' because of social bias is woefully uninformed at best and misogyny at worst. You think a woman capable of going through the coursework with a legitimate interest in one of these fields is going to be stopped by perceived prejudice? How helpless do you think women are?
Hiring managers generally WANT diversity, for every job that's perceived to discriminate against women, there are 2 that will give a woman a chance even if she has lower qualifications than her male competitors.
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 14:13:13
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
Not saying you're wrong, because it makes sense within our standard corporate, work-comes-before-all-else structure in this country. But I'd like to see the numbers from a country where more rights are provided under the law to both women and men for child birth, not requiring them to put their careers entirely on hold simply for chosing to have families.
[+]
Bahamut.Milamber
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2014-12-02 14:27:17
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
Not saying you're wrong, because it makes sense within our standard corporate, work-comes-before-all-else structure in this country. But I'd like to see the numbers from a country where more rights are provided under the law to both women and men for child birth, not requiring them to put their careers entirely on hold simply for chosing to have families. http://www.norden.org/en/nordic-council-of-ministers/ministers-for-co-operation-mr-sam/sustainable-development/indicators-for-sustainable-development-1/the-nordic-welfare-model/gender-pay-gap
[+]
VIP
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-12-02 14:35:58
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
I don't put much stock in the 77 cents figure, but the wage gap is not a myth. When comparing females and males in the same fields and positions, women earn less. The few apples to apples comparisons I've seen put it somewhere between 93 and 97 cents, and in very rare instances, women actually make more than their male counterparts. Most of the gap can be attributed to having children, which sadly affects the mother more than the father. Even being married without children has a negative impact on a woman's wage for some reason I can only assume is less opportunities for advancement due to not being available in the work sense or personal sense.
TL:DR - The wage gap isn't a myth, but the figures are grossly exaggerated.
[+]
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 14:41:17
That's actually kind of depressing.
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 14:44:04
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Hiring managers generally WANT diversity, for every job that's perceived to discriminate against women,
Anecdotal, so of less-than-ideal weight to the discussion, but in my experience the better the position, they more concerned they are about being fair and hiring the best person for the job through whatever metric they select as their guage of worth.
Hiring managers worrying about quotas or maintaining a level of perception generally work in high-yield employment for the kinds of jobs with high public visibility for those people, ie: low-skilled customer service positions.
Bahamut.Milamber
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2014-12-02 14:49:53
That's actually kind of depressing. That it is appreciably higher, or that it is still not acheiving parity?
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-12-02 14:51:33
NYT, October 4th.
Quote: After years of playing down the problem, technology companies like Google, Facebook and Apple now say they’re serious about improving the gender and ethnic diversity of their work forces and corporate boards. Recent data from those companies and others like them confirm what everyone has long known: Most of their employees are white and Asian men. Among technical employees, few are women, and even fewer are Latino or African-American.
Tech companies should care about these numbers. Many studies show that companies with gender and ethnic diversity tend to be more creative and more profitable, because varied perspectives help them design products and services that appeal to a diverse, worldwide audience.
The companies say they’re starting to address the problem by acknowledging it. Google, for instance, is training managers to be more aware of hidden biases, so they don’t, for instance, give undeservedly lower performance evaluations to women. Facebook is working with professional associations and other nonprofit groups to get more girls and minority children interested in science and technology. A big issue facing the industry is the percentage of female computer science students at universities. That number has fallen in the last 20 years, even as the percentage of women in fields like biology and chemistry has risen.
Still, there are approaches that could help:
• Not all tech industry employees are engineers and programmers. The companies employ large numbers of people who manage projects, market services and design products. Many of these jobs do not require a computer science or an engineering degree. But the proportion of women and minorities in these types of jobs is not much better than the proportion in technical positions. Companies should make efforts to hire a more diverse group of workers — including more liberal arts graduates — for nontechnical jobs, according to Vivek Wadhwa, who has written a book about women in the technology industry.
• Top technology companies hire a lot of graduates from elite universities like Stanford and the University of California, Berkeley. Their recruitment efforts should include a broader array of colleges, especially those that enroll a lot of women in technical fields.
Freeman Hrabowski, the president of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, for example, says his institution produces many women and minority graduates in science and engineering disciplines. Many find jobs with federal government agencies and East Coast technology companies, because the university has strong relationships with those employers. But it has far fewer contacts with companies in Silicon Valley.
• Companies should open up the initial interviewing process. Heidi Roizen, a venture capitalist, says she asks executives at companies she invests in whether they have interviewed any women for openings. Many said they had not even thought about doing so until she prompted them, primarily because they tend to hire friends and acquaintances.
Other kinds of businesses have used a similar approach. The National Football League, for example, has the Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview at least one minority candidate for every head coach or general manager opening.
• Creating a welcoming culture, which is often easier said than done, would help these companies retain employees who get in the door. A 2011 report by the Census Bureau found that women science and engineering graduates were much less likely to be employed in those fields then men with the same degrees. A 2008 report published by the Harvard Business Review found that women quit high tech jobs at twice the rate of men. Among the most frequently cited reasons women gave for leaving, it said, were extreme pressure and a hostile culture.
There is a lot that the education system and the government need to do to get more women and minorities interested in science and technology. But the technology industry can start tackling its diversity problem right now.
By Ramyrez 2014-12-02 14:52:18
That's actually kind of depressing. That it is appreciably higher, or that it is still not acheiving parity?
It's just that I would have suspected earnings to be a bit more even in nations requiring significantly more allowances and the like for childbirth and associated leave time.
Other factors at play though, I suppose.
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 15:10:03
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »YouTube Video Placeholder
this is what a feminist looks like
Ummm.... Never raped, beaten, or abused a woman in my life. I love my mother and my two sisters. I love my father and my two brothers....
That video is scary. The protesters as far as I saw had no ammunition besides libel, primitive language skills, and an attempt to be violent to prevent "word violence." If I were the leaders of that group I would be appalled at their behavior.
I would be outraged at their attempts to belittle and degrade the police that were there as well as simple individuals wanting to hear something other than a one sided perspective spit into their face with verbal abuse.
Those people really should be ashamed of themselves, ashamed that instead of treating all people in attendance with equal respect, they instead attempted to make their victims feel less human than themselves. Isn't that supposedly the exact opposite of what they are publicly trying to change?
Cowardice in the face of your own failings is usually how abusive behavior will seed. Cowardice that you cannot be brave enough to face your own short comings and improve them, so you would really just be lazy and tear down someone else because you cannot stand the idea that they are better than you.
These people are cowards. They cannot take the body of work that the man had created, and pick it apart for the fallacies they "think" it contains. They look through ***tinted lenses, self redacting when they read anything that contradicts their ideas. Instead of taking point for point and doing the proper work it would take to disprove this guy, and confronting him with it. They'd rather shout til they are blue in the face "Nyuh uh! Shutup stoopid rapers people, we are people with all answers" even though that is impossible. There was a very large and similar group who used these tactics successfully in the past. They were called Nazi's. Remember those guys? The people who tried to stem that tide before it was too late were usually beaten/slain by mobs, or their own government. That sounds like the kind of system we all need right? /sarcasm...
No they would rather act in mob concert mentality, getting into violent frenzies over hear say and "trusted" thoughts from among their own collective. No perspective, no context, no objectivity. They are the modern movement of individuals easily duped into revolution from convenient half truths derived from bull ***internet jargon and quips.
It is scary to see. This is how the next revolution will happen. These are pink shirted thought police that will get violent with you if you happen to want to hear another side of a coin, if the police had not been there, I guarantee that mob would have escalated into some serious violence.
TL:DR: Violence is a tool used by despots to control thoughts. Violence can be used by any race, gender, or age, to try and subdue free thinking people of any other race, gender or age. ***'s weak, and for mentally weak individuals who would rather follow a mob, than stand on the other side of it.
Stupid hippies are stoopid...
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 15:24:32
Post note: If these guys were really there specifically to change minds, they would have passively allowed anyone to enter and hear the lecture, hell they would probably watch it themselves.
After the lecture was over I would mingle with all in attendance and either dispute his points, point for point with their own gathered evidence, in polite and civil debate with the other audience members, or and this is the kicker, you might be forced to intellectually agree with a few of his points. *gasp* If that is the case then they would really have their work cut out for them to do their own subjective thinking and research to counter his ideas.
But you know, that is how real collective thoughts are developed and refined. Team work and open mindedness, not shout fest combined with vehement denial of other people's rights to free thought and expression.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan
Serveur: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-12-02 15:28:08
Thread objective fulfilled.
[+]
Lakshmi.Saevel
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2014-12-02 15:29:26
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
I don't put much stock in the 77 cents figure, but the wage gap is not a myth. When comparing females and males in the same fields and positions, women less. The few apples to apples comparisons I've seen put it somewhere between 93 and 97 cents, and in very rare instances, women actually make more than their male counterparts. Most of the gap can be attributed to having children, which sadly affects the mother more than the father. Even being married without children has a negative impact on a woman's wage for some reason I can only assume is less opportunities for advancement due to not being available in the work sense or personal sense.
TL:DR - The wage gap isn't a myth, but the figures are grossly exaggerated.
The "Wage Gap" as described by Feminists is most certainly a myth. Feminism believes that evil patriarchal men who are in management positions because of their pen!s deliberately chose to pay women less and men more because they believe the man is more capable because he has a pen!s.
That is horsesh!t and was dispelled a long time ago. It's still used because understanding the real cause of pay discrepancies is difficult and hard to fit the explanation into a news bite. It boils down to labor statistics, especially after marriage / children. Men on average work much more then women and also work more dangerous jobs then women. After getting married a man will start to work longer hours, after having children he work even more. Women do the inverse, after marriage they cut back on hours and after children it plummets. This is not forced onto women nor is it the result of some Bond villain counsel setting secret agenda, it's the result of plain human nature. Men are naturally driven to provide for women and children, this translates into a man seeing his self worth linked to his ability to "provide for his family". Society further reinforces this behavior as it's what created civilization as we know it. Women work less after marriage because they simply no longer need to work as much. After children, well it becomes pretty obvious.
When you compile all this info you get a much better idea on whats happening. Nobody is forcing women to work less, nobody is paying women less, it's purely a result of economics. The only way to possibly change it to so apply a gender tax. Tax men an additional 25% then give that 25% to women as governmental compensation. *Poof* gap gone. Or the really funny part of women wanting men to cover their health insurance (women are charge more then men for the same reason men are charged more in car insurance). Forcing a company to charge both the same just results in the additional cost transfer from the more expensive client (the woman) to the less expensive client (the man). Most welfare works this way, when broken down by users you see a stupendous amount being used for women and their children, when looking at income tax's you see the exact opposite with majority net coming from men. While men and women both pay the same income tax, women use more governmental assistance / services, virtually all of it. Finally, women are most definitely not a minority, they represent 51% of the human race. Nature seems to of slightly tilted gender selection towards producing more females then males. One of the single greatest deceptions of feminism was linking and treating "Women" to a traditionally discriminated / oppressed class like "Blacks". They also happen to earn over %60 of the college degree's today.
People can cry, scream and moan all they want, I'm speaking only from the facts without any modification or prejudice. I'm an egalitarian and therefor believe that all people should be treated the same legally and morally even though they individually have differences. Feminism, as currently applied and lead, is evil as f*ck. It's right up there with Marxism which actually subsumed the feminist cause during the second wave.
[+]
VIP
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-12-02 15:37:17
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
I don't put much stock in the 77 cents figure, but the wage gap is not a myth. When comparing females and males in the same fields and positions, women less. The few apples to apples comparisons I've seen put it somewhere between 93 and 97 cents, and in very rare instances, women actually make more than their male counterparts. Most of the gap can be attributed to having children, which sadly affects the mother more than the father. Even being married without children has a negative impact on a woman's wage for some reason I can only assume is less opportunities for advancement due to not being available in the work sense or personal sense.
TL:DR - The wage gap isn't a myth, but the figures are grossly exaggerated.
The "Wage Gap" as described by Feminists is most certainly a myth. Feminism believes that evil patriarchal men who are in management positions because of their pen!s deliberately chose to pay women less and men more because they believe the man is more capable because he has a pen!s.
That is horsesh!t and was dispelled a long time ago. It's still used because understanding the real cause of pay discrepancies is difficult and hard to fit the explanation into a news bite. It boils down to labor statistics, especially after marriage / children. Men on average work much more then women and also work more dangerous jobs then women. After getting married a man will start to work longer hours, after having children he work even more. Women do the inverse, after marriage they cut back on hours and after children it plummets. This is not forced onto women nor is it the result of some Bond villain counsel setting secret agenda, it's the result of plain human nature. Men are naturally driven to provide for women and children, this translates into a man seeing his self worth linked to his ability to "provide for his family". Society further reinforces this behavior as it's what created civilization as we know it. Women work less after marriage because they simply no longer need to work as much. After children, well it becomes pretty obvious.
When you compile all this info you get a much better idea on whats happening. Nobody is forcing women to work less, nobody is paying women less, it's purely a result of economics. The only way to possibly change it to so apply a gender tax. Tax men an additional 25% then give that 25% to women as governmental compensation. *Poof* gap gone. Or the really funny part of women wanting men to cover their health insurance (women are charge more then men for the same reason men are charged more in car insurance). Forcing a company to charge both the same just results in the additional cost transfer from the more expensive client (the woman) to the less expensive client (the man). Most welfare works this way, when broken down by users you see a stupendous amount being used for women and their children, when looking at income tax's you see the exact opposite with majority net coming from men. While men and women both pay the same income tax, women use more governmental assistance / services, virtually all of it. Finally, women are most definitely not a minority, they represent 51% of the human race. Nature seems to of slightly tilted gender selection towards producing more females then males. One of the single greatest deceptions of feminism was linking and treating "Women" to a traditionally discriminated / oppressed class like "Blacks". They also happen to earn over %60 of the college degree's today.
People can cry, scream and moan all they want, I'm speaking only from the facts without any modification or prejudice. I'm an egalitarian and therefor believe that all people should be treated the same legally and morally even though they individually have differences. Feminism, as currently applied and lead, is evil as f*ck. It's right up there with Marxism which actually subsumed the feminist cause during the second wave.
You can choose to approach the topic from the standpoint that anyone who objects to paying someone less for the same job is the caricature feminist you imagine, or you can choose (like I am) to approach it from a strictly factual standpoint. All else being equal, women earn less than men. I'd like to understand how much and why, and either determine that it's a natural byproduct of innate gender differences, or it's not and fix it.
Sure, there are plenty of overbearing feminazi's who preach about the patriarchy, etc. That shouldn't invalidate the very real disadvantage women have as earners, especially in STEM fields. Does it mean that every hiring manager is a chauvinist pig? Not anymore than it means every woman is less motivated or qualified.
By fonewear 2014-12-02 15:39:24
Women Studies group stopped watching after that.
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 15:42:07
Thread objective fulfilled. Well thought out rebuttal...
[+]
By fonewear 2014-12-02 15:42:44
All I see are angry women shouting. So that is their argument ?
By fonewear 2014-12-02 15:47:56
Women studies major enjoy working at Starbucks the rest of your life.
That or Huff Post.
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 15:49:48
Thread objective fulfilled. Well thought out rebuttal... I just found it kind of ironic that you slipped into the same tactics I described as being against real intellectual change. Distilled a couple hundred words down to one, and felt that makes your "argument?" substantial enough to refute the whole of my message. All the while falling into the simple trap mentality of "internet sound bites are truth m'kay?"
Valefor.Sehachan
Serveur: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-12-02 15:50:59
That's a joke, not a rebuttal.
Also I've already stated in more than one occasion my position on the matter of feminism and such, and I do not enjoy to repeat myself over and over. Usual p&r dwellers should already know what I think, if they cared, therefore I have nothing more to add.
Distilled a couple hundred words down to one, and felt that makes your "argument?" substantial enough to refute the whole of my message. No you moron, it was just a joke about the fact that nazis are always brought up in any argument.
[+]
VIP
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-12-02 15:55:45
No you moron, it was just a joke about the fact that nazis are always brought up in any argument.
Godwin's Law
Quote: if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2014-12-02 16:00:41
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »Wage gap is a myth, the 77 cents to a dollar figure is independant of profession choice or length of tenure. It's simply the arithmetic mean of women working fulltime vs men working fulltime. Some careers pay less than others.
I don't put much stock in the 77 cents figure, but the wage gap is not a myth. When comparing females and males in the same fields and positions, women less. The few apples to apples comparisons I've seen put it somewhere between 93 and 97 cents, and in very rare instances, women actually make more than their male counterparts. Most of the gap can be attributed to having children, which sadly affects the mother more than the father. Even being married without children has a negative impact on a woman's wage for some reason I can only assume is less opportunities for advancement due to not being available in the work sense or personal sense.
TL:DR - The wage gap isn't a myth, but the figures are grossly exaggerated.
The "Wage Gap" as described by Feminists is most certainly a myth. Feminism believes that evil patriarchal men who are in management positions because of their pen!s deliberately chose to pay women less and men more because they believe the man is more capable because he has a pen!s.
That is horsesh!t and was dispelled a long time ago. It's still used because understanding the real cause of pay discrepancies is difficult and hard to fit the explanation into a news bite. It boils down to labor statistics, especially after marriage / children. Men on average work much more then women and also work more dangerous jobs then women. After getting married a man will start to work longer hours, after having children he work even more. Women do the inverse, after marriage they cut back on hours and after children it plummets. This is not forced onto women nor is it the result of some Bond villain counsel setting secret agenda, it's the result of plain human nature. Men are naturally driven to provide for women and children, this translates into a man seeing his self worth linked to his ability to "provide for his family". Society further reinforces this behavior as it's what created civilization as we know it. Women work less after marriage because they simply no longer need to work as much. After children, well it becomes pretty obvious.
When you compile all this info you get a much better idea on whats happening. Nobody is forcing women to work less, nobody is paying women less, it's purely a result of economics. The only way to possibly change it to so apply a gender tax. Tax men an additional 25% then give that 25% to women as governmental compensation. *Poof* gap gone. Or the really funny part of women wanting men to cover their health insurance (women are charge more then men for the same reason men are charged more in car insurance). Forcing a company to charge both the same just results in the additional cost transfer from the more expensive client (the woman) to the less expensive client (the man). Most welfare works this way, when broken down by users you see a stupendous amount being used for women and their children, when looking at income tax's you see the exact opposite with majority net coming from men. While men and women both pay the same income tax, women use more governmental assistance / services, virtually all of it. Finally, women are most definitely not a minority, they represent 51% of the human race. Nature seems to of slightly tilted gender selection towards producing more females then males. One of the single greatest deceptions of feminism was linking and treating "Women" to a traditionally discriminated / oppressed class like "Blacks". They also happen to earn over %60 of the college degree's today.
People can cry, scream and moan all they want, I'm speaking only from the facts without any modification or prejudice. I'm an egalitarian and therefor believe that all people should be treated the same legally and morally even though they individually have differences. Feminism, as currently applied and lead, is evil as f*ck. It's right up there with Marxism which actually subsumed the feminist cause during the second wave.
You can choose to approach the topic from the standpoint that anyone who objects to paying someone less for the same job is the caricature feminist you imagine, or you can choose (like I am) to approach it from a strictly factual standpoint. All else being equal, women earn less than men. I'd like to understand how much and why, and either determine that it's a natural byproduct of innate gender differences, or it's not and fix it.
Sure, there are plenty of overbearing feminazi's who preach about the patriarchy, etc. That shouldn't invalidate the very real disadvantage women have as earners, especially in STEM fields. Does it mean that every hiring manager is a chauvinist pig? Not anymore than it means every woman is less motivated or qualified.
The why is simple. Women choose to earn less (as a whole) by working less (as a whole). Thinking about taking a few years of to raise your kids? That's part of the equation. Thinking of working part time now cause you got married? That's part of the equation too. On a case by case basis of here's a job, it requires X and I have a male and female candidate. Women get a compensation equal to men probably 99-100% of the time.
Otherwise, why on earth would anyone ever hire a man to do anything when you can save 20% right off the top by ringing the same amount of work out of a woman.
Ragnarok.Nausi
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2014-12-02 16:01:55
Closest I've ever been was discussing abortion while being the only male in the classroom...yea my opinion wasn't heard.
/shocked
I seriously entertained the notion that you were a girl.
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 16:02:46
That's a joke, not a rebuttal.
Also I've already stated in more than one occasion my position on the matter of feminism and such, and I do not enjoy to repeat myself over and over. Usual p&r dwellers should already know what I think, if they cared, therefore I have nothing more to add.
Distilled a couple hundred words down to one, and felt that makes your "argument?" substantial enough to refute the whole of my message. No you moron, it was just a joke about the fact that nazis are always brought up in any argument.
There you go use your words... My entire post was really not geared toward any particular movement. It was mainly an attempt to describe how the method of protest in that video is faulty, will cause more hate and discontent, and effectively create zero change, or dangerous change.
As far as most of my feminist perspective is concerned Saev is pretty well aligned with my own. Inequality will always exist between men and women. They are different, have different needs, require different resources to thrive. Blanket programs and philosophies will never make the individual happy, government laws are not meant to be customized to fit every peg. If they start doing that, your equality bell curve simply changes shape to accommodate the new bandwagonracegenderagestyleculture, leaving the people who are not at the peak suffering and providing special privileges for the ones that are.
I.E..... A government cannot force "equality" because there is no standard equal for everyone.
[+]
Leviathan.Draugo
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2775
By Leviathan.Draugo 2014-12-02 16:04:39
No you moron, it was just a joke about the fact that nazis are always brought up in any argument.
Godwin's Law
Quote: if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.
Haha fair enough, my bad....
I just found this one interesting...
Quote: WILKES-BARRE, Pa. (AP) -- Police say a northeast Pennsylvania woman chased her boyfriend around a dining room and stabbed him in the chest because he started eating Thanksgiving dinner while she slept off a bender.
Police say Jacklyn Blake confessed Thursday to officers responding to her Wilkes-Barre home. They say they found her boyfriend inside holding a towel over his chest. He was hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries.
The 47-year-old Blake is charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, simple assault, reckless endangerment and making terroristic threats. Information on her lawyer wasn't immediately available. According to police, Blake's boyfriend says she'd been drunk earlier in the day and attacked him after waking up from a nap. He says she stabbed him and then threw the knife at him, striking just below the left eye.
Source
|
|