Please Sign In To Stop Genocide In Palestine |
||
|
Please sign in to Stop genocide in palestine
Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Maybe you don't, but on this side of the world we care, you guys will care when the bad guys win and Israel need more land. Think what you want of stuff, but don't lump the rest of the world with the likes of you please.
Asura.Ccl said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Maybe you don't, but on this side of the world we care, you guys will care when the bad guys win and Israel need more land. If you care, then prove it. Why hasn't any country gone to help the Syrian rebels? Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » You would be surprised just how important Russia is becoming. Many alienated people and nations across the world see Russia as a counter-weight to the US's hegemony. That number is growing, not decreasing. A complete inverse situation of the cold war. Its strange that the US chooses to part with international popular opinion so openly now and doesn't seem to give a flying f_ck about what its allies think by "keeping it real". Israel is a prime example. I wonder what it would take to reverse the world's opinion at this point? Must kinda suck for the US - they have to maintain their military superiority ultimately and indefinitely...because Lord knows there are a lot of people on this planet that would love to just ignore them and tell them to keep to their part of the world, at the very least. This isn't very hard, we are happy to do it, and we are light years ahead of your "savior." Ignorance is bliss.. don't worry Vic by the time any of this come to manifest itself you will probably have died of heart disease, cancer, aids, an accident, a violent crime or on the road, have your house foreclosed on you and be out on the street, at which point your opinion won't matter at all, seeing as how you treat your weakest over there in 'murica. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Ccl said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Maybe you don't, but on this side of the world we care, you guys will care when the bad guys win and Israel need more land. If you care, then prove it. Why hasn't any country gone to help the Syrian rebels? Cause you care about something mean you have to take weapon and go at war for it ? Now I understand all your post thank you.
[+]
Odin.Godofgods said: » Valefor.Sehachan said: » Odin.Godofgods said: » I went to a new jersey public school Short and simple... Yes. You gotta love the 'history' they teach. Things like the American civil war was ONLY about slavery and absolutely nothing else. - Things like England, France, and the USA were the only [good guys] to fight in WW2. Of course everyone else was defeated, so America saved the world. - Never even brought up things like the war of 1812, Korean war, Vietnam, desert storm. Need i go on? Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Stopping a regime from mass murdering it's own people =/= attacking the county. Asura.Ccl said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Ccl said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Maybe you don't, but on this side of the world we care, you guys will care when the bad guys win and Israel need more land. If you care, then prove it. Why hasn't any country gone to help the Syrian rebels? Cause you care about something mean you have to take weapon and go at war for it ? Now I understand all your post thank you. "Either with us, or against us" "If yer not wit us, yer wit da 'turists" Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Stopping a regime from mass murdering it's own people =/= attacking the county. Yeah I'm sure a resolution that was raised for a vote in the UN security council was goaled at sitting down with the Syrians and talking things through, much like they sat down and talked with Libya, amarite? Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries.
[+]
You're not very smart, are you?
Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Or legitimacy apparently. This pretty much sums up the problem. Blazed1979 said: » Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Or legitimacy apparently. This pretty much sums up the problem. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries. US doesn't need legitimacy and sanction from UN to take military action against another country, but tries to do so anyways... why? to remind everyone that they don't give a f_ck? Yeehaw! Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Or legitimacy apparently. This pretty much sums up the problem. So what you're saying is "Might is right"? Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries. US doesn't need legitimacy and sanction from UN to take military action against another enemy in a country, but tries to do so anyways... why? to remind everyone that they don't give a f_ck? Yeehaw! Blazed1979 said: » So what you're saying is "Might is right"? Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries. US doesn't need legitimacy and sanction from UN to take military action against another enemy in a country, but tries to do so anyways... why? to remind everyone that they don't give a f_ck? Yeehaw! I'm all for having dirty laundry, France isn't the best example either, but that's some next level delusion if you really think the US are seen as helpers, or actually are going there to help.
[+]
Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries. US doesn't need legitimacy and sanction from UN to take military action against another enemy in a country, but tries to do so anyways... why? to remind everyone that they don't give a f_ck? Yeehaw! So Syria is the US's enemy? Who else is in that list? Are any of these in that list as well: 1. Iran - blew up your embassy and you didn't do ***. 2. China - your owner 3. North Korea - been taunting you for years and obstructing your foreign policy. 4. Russia - Invaded your allies. Funny, but you haven't done f_ck all to any of them. Where the US military might when it comes to countries that can retaliate?
[+]
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Jetackuu said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Blazed1979 said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » We didn't attack Syria because the American public said not to do it, we are more than happy to just ignore them and let them kill each other, whats the death toll at now? Some irrelevant number? The world doesn't care, no one has gone to the aid of Syria. Actually you didn't attack Syria because the Chinese and Russians veto'ed your *** in the UN Security council. Do you even news, bro? Uh, we don't need the UN's permission to do anything. We could have bombed Assad, if we desired. The UN has no authority of over other countries. US doesn't need legitimacy and sanction from UN to take military action against another enemy in a country, but tries to do so anyways... why? to remind everyone that they don't give a f_ck? Yeehaw! I'm all for having dirty laundry, France isn't the best example either, but that's some next level delusion if you really think the US are seen as helpers, or actually are going there to help. What countries are you even talking about? oh that's right, the US is good at attacking either has-beens or the world's weakest nations...
Didn't you guys get your *** handed to you in Somalia, the world's poorest would-be-nation? You claimed to have won the war in Afghanistan.... only its not really over is it? Taliban are on the rise and recapturing the areas they lost. You claimed to have won the war in Iraq, and oh what's this.. ISIS you say? You spent 3 decades fighting a people (Vietnam) with your superior military might only to flee with your tail between your legs. Lets not forget WWII... you lurked in the shadows, watching the entire thing, funding both sides, and came in at the last moment when you knew which side was going to win. Blazed1979 said: » So Syria is the US's enemy? - No. Who else is in that list? Are any of these in that list as well: 1. Iran - blew up your embassy and you didn't do ***. Other than impose sanctions that have crippled their economy and caused their once popular President to be ousted? K. 2. China - your owner. Hasn't this fantasy been debunked? 3. North Korea - been taunting you for years and obstructing your foreign policy. HAHAHAHAHA. NK hasn't and won't obstruct ***. 4. Russia - Invaded your allies. Ukraine is not our ally. Also, did Russia have permission from your precious UN to invade and occupy Crimea? Legitimacy? Funny, but you haven't done f_ck all to any of them. Where the US military might when it comes to countries that can retaliate? Do you even news, bro? No, you don't know how to read either do you?
We don't have an issue with the Syrians, we have an issue with their leadership killing all of their people. 1. We don't like to start wars, contrary to popular belief. 2. Actually we're are own owner, China has a fraction of US debt, a big chunk of it is owned by ourselves. 3. NK doesn't do ***, they sabber rattle, nothing more. (not to mention, we're still technically at war with them. 4. See #1 Again: we don't attack countries, we haven't attacked a sovereign nation in decades. OK, I'm done arguing with this basket case who doesn't even understand history properly.
Blazed1979 said: » oh that's right, the US is good at attacking either has-beens or the world's weakest nations... Didn't you guys get your *** handed to you in Somalia, the world's poorest would-be-nation? No? You claimed to have won the war in Afghanistan.... only its not really over is it? Taliban are on the rise and recapturing the areas they lost. Ok. You claimed to have won the war in Iraq, and oh what's this.. ISIS you say? Ok. You spent 3 decades fighting a people (Vietnam) with your superior military might only to flee with your tail between your legs. 9 years = 30? Lets not forget WWII... you lurked in the shadows, watching the entire thing, funding both sides, and came in at the last moment when you knew which side was going to win. Um? What? Is this a serious post?
[+]
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Do you honestly believe that what your country does in those countries are helping, protecting or whatever other word you have in mind right now? I'm all for having dirty laundry, France isn't the best example either, but that's some next level delusion if you really think the US are seen as helpers, or actually are going there to help. Blazed1979 said: » came in at the last moment when you knew which side was going to win. Besides US was also having its fight with Japan for pacific possessions. inb4 discussion on nuking Japan
|
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
