Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
Do not worry. This article is dated 31/3/2015
Neil deGrasse Tyson Defends Scientology—and the Bush Administration’s Science Record Offline
Posts: 35422
It's international trolling day get out there and troll someone !
YouTube Video Placeholder
I'm not very good at trolling, sorry. :/
Plus it's not a big thing here. Offline
Posts: 35422
Trolling is an art form. It takes years of a being a *** plus beer !
Makes sense. I'm not very artistic.
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Standard politician nonsense. I'm sure you can find examples across the board. Seraph.Ramyrez said: » I'm sure you can find examples across the board. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Seraph.Ramyrez said: » I'm sure you can find examples across the board. Actually a little on the busy side today myself. I'm just assuming, but I've got to think that there's legislation all over the place that people voted against, and then turn around and applied for on behalf of their constituents. Frankly it's probably irresponsible not to do so. "Well, we didn't want this to go through at all, but if this is what I have to do to look out for the people who voted me here." *shrug* Whatever. *** politics anyhow. Sounds like Obamacare.
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Precisely. And he's categorically dismissing it because it's really no different from what goes on every day in Congress. As I said, it's really sort of required of you to work within the confines of the laws that are passed once they're passed, whether you voted against them or not. The weird part isn't that they're doing this; it's that they even considered not doing it. It's their responsibility to do what they can for their constituents, whether they originally supported the bills or not. It's established policy now and while yes, there's always the possibility of it changing in the future, right now it's the law of the land and they should be carrying it out and getting the appropriate funds for their states. Actually, I was surprised to see this on Reuters. Would have expected it on Salon or something else.
Seraph.Ramyrez said: » It's their responsibility to do what they can for their constituents, whether they originally supported the bills or not. It's established policy now and while yes, there's always the possibility of it changing in the future, right now it's the law of the land and they should be carrying it out and getting the appropriate funds for their states. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Actually, I was surprised to see this on Reuters. Would have expected it on Salon or something else. I would have expected it in the blog section like the livestock article from yesterday. More so, actually. But ah well. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Seraph.Ramyrez said: » It's their responsibility to do what they can for their constituents, whether they originally supported the bills or not. It's established policy now and while yes, there's always the possibility of it changing in the future, right now it's the law of the land and they should be carrying it out and getting the appropriate funds for their states. He's too busy getting personal funds and grafting from bridge contracts for his mafia connections. Seraph.Ramyrez said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Precisely. And he's categorically dismissing it because it's really no different from what goes on every day in Congress. As I said, it's really sort of required of you to work within the confines of the laws that are passed once they're passed, whether you voted against them or not. The weird part isn't that they're doing this; it's that they even considered not doing it. It's their responsibility to do what they can for their constituents, whether they originally supported the bills or not. It's established policy now and while yes, there's always the possibility of it changing in the future, right now it's the law of the land and they should be carrying it out and getting the appropriate funds for their states. Mind you, Texas probably could have weathered this without having to raise taxes, but it would have hurt them greatly. Certainly would have killed the contingency fund. Not every state is like Texas and have the ability to cover the idiotic mistakes of the federal government. *shrug*
Whatever. Plays out the same in the end. Arkansas Governor will not sign.
I like at the end where it says that Goergia's bill hit a roadblock when an anti-discrimination ammendment was successfuly added on. The newest reform list by the Greek Government:
http://im.ft-static.com/content/images/55b27a7e-d87c-11e4-ba53-00144feab7de.pdf Hopefully the Troika will get the data to calculate and confirm the expectations. Please no more cake or pizza talk... We already have 9 pages on cakes alone. Use the Huff Post thread if you must vent your feels.
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Please no more cake or pizza talk... We already have 9 pages on cakes alone. Use the Huff Post thread if you must vent your feels. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Holy crap... WANT Offline
Posts: 35422
Quote: The driver killed in a violent confrontation at a National Security Agency gate identified as transgender and was a sex worker in Baltimore, according to a friend. Ricky Shawatza Hall, 27, was killed Monday when NSA police opened fire on a stolen car that then crashed into a police vehicle. A passenger was wounded, as was an officer. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|