And obligatory simpsons clip:
Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
Offline
Posts: 35422
I've had up to here with your Rules!!
And obligatory simpsons clip: YouTube Video Placeholder
Shiva.Nikolce said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » k? Who changed the rules? you did, you said post companies that were bankrupted for their own gain and I listed twenty and then you backpeddled and said it had to fall under onur's criteria which you also didn't read correctly. Did you even read what he wrote and compared it to what I wrote? It is almost identical. The only difference is sentence structure. But now we are stuck in an infinite loop where the only way out is for one of us to back down. And since we are both anal people..... Asura.Kingnobody said: » And since we are both men, and this is the internet... Offline
Posts: 35422
I don't want to argue: Five seconds later I want to argue about why I don't want to argue !
Offline
Posts: 13787
insert Ron White...
"And she told me she was anal... and I was like 'great!'. I didn't know there were two types of anal, and she was the wrong one" Offline
Posts: 35422
Bloodrose said: » insert Ron White... "And she told me she was anal... and I was like 'great!'. I didn't know there were two types of anal, and she was the wrong one" But I poop from there not right now you don't ! Offline
Posts: 35422
I can't post that here but if you are curious look it up !
Offline
Posts: 35422
Meanwhile your highness is here talking: Hillary !
I prefer "you're damn right we're evil!" and then push them down...
Asura.Kingnobody said: » He was defining companies who's executives had more ownership of the company than other shareholders See, I'm used to your incessant nit-picking. I was pointing out that I was talking about executives rather than shareholders because you used the word "owner" and "owner" technically refers to the shareholders in a publicly-traded company. Do you want to actually produce an answer to the substance of what I was talking about or are you going to continue feeding yourself with lice? So how about that Hillary
If Democrats can’t field a primary challenger to her after this disaster, they deserve her. I would be way more worried about the fact you have no one that can beat her in the general election.
Shiva.Viciousss said: » I would be way more worried about the fact you have no one that can beat her in the general election. If the election happened right now, maybe, but a lot can happen in 2 years. Dude, the way this is going, Huckabee (the horror) could steamroll over her in 18 months.
She would have been better off coming out and saying, "I don't care, the public won't ever give a ***." EDIT: This whole thing was done in order to evade accountability, at the great cost of national security. It's a pretty easy thing to explain. She's a Clinton, it's not a hard sell to anyone that she lies in order to promote her own self interest. Yeah, the GOP has only just started to implode.
Of all the potential candidates, Huckabee? Him?
Edit: Oh that was sarcasm, NEVERMIND LMAO Huckabee?! Huckabee couldn't steamroll Ron Paul in his home state a few years back. Jeb Bush has no support from independents or minorities, and he's about the only candidate that has a snowball's chance in hell of beating Hillary in a national even with the current "scandal" over her doing the same thing as the pub's did for 8 years and no being sorry for it.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » She's a Clinton, it's not a hard sell to anyone that she lies in order to promote her own self interest. However, the exact same statement can be made about someone with the name Bush, Gore, Quayle, Cheney, etc. etc. Hell, the Bushes and the Clintons are buddies now. And although I look with considerable askance on people tracing every US President to a rather limited breeding stock (because something like 1 in 6 humans alive today are direct-line descendants of Genghiz Khan -- that's how breeding and relationships work and why Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon could be done via genetics as easily as via IMDb), it does need to be said that our government has been dominated by legacies and dynasties on both sides of the aisle. So, basically, I'm asking what point you're making. If you want to rail against Hillary for one potential breach of what may or may not actually be the law, does that mean you get to ignore all the similar ***perpetuated by literally every other politician inside the Beltway and beyond? Iran Offers to Mediate Talks Between Republicans and Obama
(Please have an understanding of satire before clicking) Offline
Posts: 13787
Ramyrez said: » Iran Offers to Mediate Talks Between Republicans and Obama (Please have an understanding of satire before clicking) Bloodrose said: » So Iran is now a marriage counselor? Offline
Posts: 13787
Why not both?
Someone's gotta cover them ugly mugs. Ramyrez said: » Iran Offers to Mediate Talks Between Republicans and Obama (Please have an understanding of satire before clicking) Best post ever from you. Jeb Bush 2016!
Odin.Godofgods
Offline
"The last person to have a good time in Washington was General Jubal Early in 1864.
He was attacking it at the time..." - Henrietta Lange Anyone else just look through the various ads and slogans found on that page and let out a huge sigh?
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|