Guns, Girls, And WoW

Langues: JP EN DE FR
Yellow Box
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Guns, Girls, and WoW
Guns, Girls, and WoW
First Page 2 3 ... 12 13
 Bismarck.Bloodrose
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Bloodrose
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-05-30 17:18:04
Link | Citer | R
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Sylph.Safiyyah said: »
What is I said is exactly the opposite
Apologies, I paraphrased poorly by adding in an implication you did not state.

Nonetheless, I find your point weak. Everyone who makes it through to adulthood managed to survive the ravages of puberty and the miseries of other adolescents. It's not being a teenager that is at fault here, any more than it is Asperger's syndrome. Both Rodgers and Lanza were apparently diagnosed, so they knew they were different. For the majority of aspies out there, that knowledge is freeing and it is lack of that knowledge which tends to make us deeply uncomfortable.

If someone knows they socialize differently but still opts to resort to capital murder, the system (whatever that means) cannot be said to have failed. Psychology experts examined Lanza and Rodgers and offered sound assessments. In Lanza's case, it appears his mother enabled his sociopathy. In Rodgers's case, my personal assessment is still out on the culpability of the parents, but they actually contacted the police not long before this incident, so I'm disinclined to lay a lot at their feet.

No one could reasonably predict what these two men did because what they did was not reasonable. Insane people like these two are notably adept actors when it comes to fooling people, too. If a mental serial killer alarm went off in normal people's heads every time one of them walked past, we'd never have mass murders. And it's not as though people don't instinctively pick up on other negative qualities (there's been a lot of research done into perception of trust and honesty and it has had some remarkably consistent results between gut feeling about someone and the actual behavior of the person in question).

Sometimes awful things happen and no amount of hindsighting is going to find a good reason. It doesn't really do much good to attach superficial explanations. At least, it does no good for me, since I don't personally get any solace out of having something to blame. I am, admittedly, an unusual person, so this may be symptomatic of that.

If we really want to talk about possible hindsight assessments, though, both Lanza and Rodgers were fans of first-person shooter games. And play-acting violence only increases violent tendencies (those pop psychologists who told patients to punch a pillow or something eventually found that their patients grew steadily more violent as they unleashed their outbursts). I think it's ridiculous to "blame" video games, but at what point do realistic hunter-killer murder games become culturally worrisome enough? I've had to explain to several people down the years that when I say I play online games, I mean that I'm bloodlessly killing dragons since the popular perception is that I'm talking about Call of Duty or Halo.
I bolded the important part, or at the very least, what seemed important to me.

In these regard, there is nothing unusual about it. Those who can't understand that bad things happen without something they can clearly understand, will try to attach something to it that doesn't belong. So it isn't because you are unusual. People as a whole, want to blame something, just so that can feel that little bit of solace, some place they can direct their anger at, and hurt something in return, just to ease the helplessness (among other emotions) they are feeling as a result.

Then there are those special cases where they feel the need to use such tragedies to fuel the fires of political agendas, or more hate.

People want something solid and concrete to blame? Try blaming a culture that worships violence like it's God. The heroic portrayal of violence that perpetuates itself in more than just video games, or movies, or any single media form. People should take into consideration, that, however miniscule, that if they aren't actively taking a part in their children's lives, teaching them reality from fantasy, that certain things are not ok. That there are repercussions to be had for their behavior, be it good or bad.

Regardless of what a society thinks, it still does take a village to raise a child. They learn behaviors, good or bad, from the people around them, and the actors and characters they portray on the big screen, as to what is socially acceptable.

Be that as it may, individually, that child matures, and should have learned that no matter the influence, they still make the choice.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2014-05-30 17:26:06
Link | Citer | R
 
Take a village to raise a child is this Hillary Clinton ?

How about the child be responsible and stop blaming society and video games etc.
 Bismarck.Bloodrose
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Bloodrose
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-05-30 17:27:58
Link | Citer | R
 
Hillary seems like she means it in the literal sense, while the phrase is meant to state that it takes more than just the parents to raise a child.

They learn and decipher behaviors from the people they see as influential around them.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2014-05-30 17:30:29
Link | Citer | R
 
I knew I shouldn't have played GTA V....
 Bismarck.Bloodrose
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Bloodrose
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-05-30 17:33:13
Link | Citer | R
 
As I said in my long-winded post, Ultimately, each child is still responsible for the choices they make.

But a pattern emerges from how they make those choices as well.

Even the children are partly responsible (to a reasonable degree) for raising themselves, since they are still part of that village (aka society).
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-05-30 18:06:47
Link | Citer | R
 
If you read this kids manifesto, it's not like he didn't know what he was doing was wrong. He doesn't cackle on about taking lives just for the hell of it but justifies his actions through perceived wrongs against him on account of society. His inflated ego a means to protect himself against any amount of self-analysis regarding his strategies. Social awkwardness at its finest. Everyone else is *** up! Not me, no way!

I don't see how the 'media' is at fault here when he clearly lays out this is base revenge both to be remembered and to finally air his grievances with those sorority chicks who didn't fall into his lap. He fixated upon one specific type of woman and when they didn't reciprocate what he was looking for, he snapped.

If this was merely about sex, there were multiple avenues to solve that little problem.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2014-05-30 18:22:44
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
If you read this kids manifesto, it's not like he didn't know what he was doing was wrong. He doesn't cackle on about taking lives just for the hell of it but justifies his actions through perceived wrongs against him on account of society. His inflated ego a means to protect himself against any amount of self-analysis regarding his strategies. Social awkwardness at its finest. Everyone else is *** up! Not me, no way!

I don't see how the 'media' is at fault here when he clearly lays out this is base revenge both to be remembered and to finally air his grievances with those sorority chicks who didn't fall into his lap. He fixated upon one specific type of woman and when they didn't reciprocate what he was looking for, he snapped.

If this was merely about sex, there were multiple avenues to solve that little problem.

Logic isn't allowed on the internet.
[+]
 Bismarck.Bloodrose
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Bloodrose
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-05-30 18:26:10
Link | Citer | R
 
fonewear said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
If you read this kids manifesto, it's not like he didn't know what he was doing was wrong. He doesn't cackle on about taking lives just for the hell of it but justifies his actions through perceived wrongs against him on account of society. His inflated ego a means to protect himself against any amount of self-analysis regarding his strategies. Social awkwardness at its finest. Everyone else is *** up! Not me, no way!

I don't see how the 'media' is at fault here when he clearly lays out this is base revenge both to be remembered and to finally air his grievances with those sorority chicks who didn't fall into his lap. He fixated upon one specific type of woman and when they didn't reciprocate what he was looking for, he snapped.

If this was merely about sex, there were multiple avenues to solve that little problem.

Logic isn't allowed on the internet.
You forgot that if it's on the internet, it HAS to be true.
[+]
 Phoenix.Xantavia
Offline
Serveur: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
User: xantavia
Posts: 449
By Phoenix.Xantavia 2014-05-31 02:33:31
Link | Citer | R
 
Asura.Kingnobody said: »

It doesn't matter if you were a jock, a nerd, a nobody, a goth, a pervert, or whatnot. We all went through it all, that's just life.

How we dealt with it is what defines us, and what makes us different.
So close, but you were just a little off.
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-05-31 09:42:51
Link | Citer | R
 
Quote:
Authorities did not know that Elliot Rodger, whose shooting rampage left six dead and more than a dozen injured in a California college town, owned firearms despite three interactions with the police within the year, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases, the Times reported on Friday.

"The issue of weapons did not come up," sheriff's spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told the Times. "We had no information that he had weapons or reason to believe he had weapons."
Source
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
User: Chanti
Posts: 12242
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-05-31 21:47:45
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Quote:
Authorities did not know that Elliot Rodger, whose shooting rampage left six dead and more than a dozen injured in a California college town, owned firearms despite three interactions with the police within the year, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases, the Times reported on Friday.

"The issue of weapons did not come up," sheriff's spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told the Times. "We had no information that he had weapons or reason to believe he had weapons."
Source
Yeah. But this the information age. The surveillance state.

Automatic software should have linked this all this together and spat out at the local cops.

If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
Serveur: Shiva
Game: FFXI
User: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-05-31 21:58:25
Link | Citer | R
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Quote:
Authorities did not know that Elliot Rodger, whose shooting rampage left six dead and more than a dozen injured in a California college town, owned firearms despite three interactions with the police within the year, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases, the Times reported on Friday.

"The issue of weapons did not come up," sheriff's spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told the Times. "We had no information that he had weapons or reason to believe he had weapons."
Source
Yeah. But this the information age. The surveillance state.

Automatic software should have linked this all this together and spat out at the local cops.

If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-05-31 21:59:59
Link | Citer | R
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Quote:
Authorities did not know that Elliot Rodger, whose shooting rampage left six dead and more than a dozen injured in a California college town, owned firearms despite three interactions with the police within the year, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases, the Times reported on Friday.

"The issue of weapons did not come up," sheriff's spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told the Times. "We had no information that he had weapons or reason to believe he had weapons."
Source
Yeah. But this the information age. The surveillance state.

Automatic software should have linked this all this together and spat out at the local cops.

If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-05-31 22:00:28
Link | Citer | R
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Quote:
Authorities did not know that Elliot Rodger, whose shooting rampage left six dead and more than a dozen injured in a California college town, owned firearms despite three interactions with the police within the year, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases, the Times reported on Friday.

"The issue of weapons did not come up," sheriff's spokeswoman Kelly Hoover told the Times. "We had no information that he had weapons or reason to believe he had weapons."
Source
Yeah. But this the information age. The surveillance state.

Automatic software should have linked this all this together and spat out at the local cops.

If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Profits, obviously.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2014-06-01 07:27:47
Link | Citer | R
 
Sarcasm that's a really useful personality trait.
[+]
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-06-01 07:45:32
Link | Citer | R
 
Phoenix.Xantavia said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »

It doesn't matter if you were a jock, a nerd, a nobody, a goth, a pervert, or whatnot. We all went through it all, that's just life.

How we dealt with it is what defines us, and what makes us different.
So close, but you were just a little off.
YouTube Video Placeholder
Thanks for bringing up bad childhood memories.

I finally completely forgot about that movie, and now you have to bring it back to my life.

Curse you, curse you and all your kittens!
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
User: Chanti
Posts: 12242
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-06-01 08:56:22
Link | Citer | R
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
....
If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
Its a legitimate compliant but I have always been a sarcastic wiseass. Therefore the tone.

We have the surveillance state. We have no right to privacy any more. There are files on all of us mouldering in so many computers they can't be counted.

But we are not more secure. Indeed we are less secure.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-06-01 09:03:36
Link | Citer | R
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
....
If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
Its a legitimate compliant but I have always been a sarcastic wiseass. Therefore the tone.

We have the surveillance state. We have no right to privacy any more. There are files on all of us mouldering in so many computers they can't be counted.

But we are not more secure. Indeed we are less secure.
And what are you going to do about it?

Action speak louder than bitching and whining.

Although bitching and whining can be considered actions....but I digress.

How about you don't support people who's agenda is to create a police state and support people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all?
Offline
Posts: 729
By Fumiku 2014-06-01 11:55:08
Link | Citer | R
 
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
....
If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
Its a legitimate compliant but I have always been a sarcastic wiseass. Therefore the tone.

We have the surveillance state. We have no right to privacy any more. There are files on all of us mouldering in so many computers they can't be counted.

But we are not more secure. Indeed we are less secure.
And what are you going to do about it?

Action speak louder than bitching and whining.

Although bitching and whining can be considered actions....but I digress.

How about you don't support people who's agenda is to create a police state and support people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all?

Not trying to hijack the thread, but if you think police state agenda was created and kept up solely though the dems...... you might want to come out from under that rock a little bit.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-06-01 12:21:05
Link | Citer | R
 
Fumiku said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
....
If we can't give up liberty for security WTF are we giving it up for?
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I'd rather my police state be inefficient, blind, and incompetent. I'd lobby for crippled, brain-dead, and unarmed to be added to the list, too.
Its a legitimate compliant but I have always been a sarcastic wiseass. Therefore the tone.

We have the surveillance state. We have no right to privacy any more. There are files on all of us mouldering in so many computers they can't be counted.

But we are not more secure. Indeed we are less secure.
And what are you going to do about it?

Action speak louder than bitching and whining.

Although bitching and whining can be considered actions....but I digress.

How about you don't support people who's agenda is to create a police state and support people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all?

Not trying to hijack the thread, but if you think police state agenda was created and kept up solely though the dems...... you might want to come out from under that rock a little bit.
Nope, I'm just saying that in general, if you don't like (or think) how things are run, instead of bitching and whining about it like a baby, do something about it.

It has nothing to do with political alliances or who's in power now, it has everything to do with action and creating it.
[+]
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
User: Chanti
Posts: 12242
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-06-02 09:52:39
Link | Citer | R
 
Fumiku said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
....
How about you don't support people who's agenda is to create a police state and support people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all?
Not trying to hijack the thread, but if you think police state agenda was created and kept up solely though the dems...... you might want to come out from under that rock a little bit.
Its bipartisan.

King, where do I find those "people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all"?
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
User: Chanti
Posts: 12242
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-06-02 10:10:34
Link | Citer | R
 
And back on my rant....

Police Didn't Know About Isla Vista Killer's Weapons: Report


Selected quotes:
Quote:
Rodger had legally purchased three firearms leading up to the shooting spree, a fact that authorities could have discovered by searching law enforcement databases....

The news comes a day after the sheriff's office revealed new details about a welfare check the police conducted on the night of April 30 on Roger outside his apartment, following a concerned call from a county mental health worker....

That night, just weeks before the killings in Isla Vista, California, a half dozen officers responded to the call and asked Rodger about disturbing videos he had posted online....

"They did not view the videos or conduct a weapons check on Rodger," a statement from the sheriff's office said....

The sheriff's office has maintained that the responding officers acted professionally and within state law and the department policies.
And yet six people are dead. Some great professionalism there guys.

Facts: A mental health worker told the sheriff's dept about the disturbing videos. The cops don't bother looking at the videos. They don't search a database where the gun purchases are a matter of record. They interview the kid and decide he is harmless.

/storms off muttering.....
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-06-02 10:30:35
Link | Citer | R
 
Damned if you do, damned if don't. Most people just shrug and do nothing. The ones who do, act alone and are criticized.

Had one of the cops tried to do something, I'm sure he would have been ridiculed and reprimanded because of the high profile of the father.
[+]
 Bismarck.Bloodrose
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Bloodrose
Posts: 4322
By Bismarck.Bloodrose 2014-06-02 10:33:30
Link | Citer | R
 
So in order to avoid scrutiny, the allowed themselves to be scrutinized.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-06-02 14:04:08
Link | Citer | R
 
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: »
So in order to avoid scrutiny, the allowed themselves to be scrutinized.
Happens all the time.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-06-02 14:17:14
Link | Citer | R
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
King, where do I find those "people who's agenda is to encourage freedom for all"?
They are out there. But you probably won't listen to them because they don't have a "D" next to their name.

And I'm not talking about any Republicans either. There are not that many out there that talks about personal freedoms.
 Sylph.Safiyyah
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
User: Safiyyah
Posts: 1119
By Sylph.Safiyyah 2014-06-03 15:58:34
Link | Citer | R
 
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Sylph.Safiyyah said: »
What is I said is exactly the opposite
Apologies, I paraphrased poorly by adding in an implication you did not state.

Nonetheless, I find your point weak. Everyone who makes it through to adulthood managed to survive the ravages of puberty and the miseries of other adolescents. It's not being a teenager that is at fault here, any more than it is Asperger's syndrome. Both Rodgers and Lanza were apparently diagnosed, so they knew they were different. For the majority of aspies out there, that knowledge is freeing and it is lack of that knowledge which tends to make us deeply uncomfortable.

One, as I and others have pointed out, many people don't make it to adulthood, or arrive there deeply scarred by teenage trauma. Two, I am not a psychiatrist, but Lanza and Rodgers seemed to have more severe mental illness than just Aspergers. A tendency towards violence and delusional behavior are not linked with Aspergers.

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Sometimes awful things happen and no amount of hindsighting is going to find a good reason. It doesn't really do much good to attach superficial explanations. At least, it does no good for me, since I don't personally get any solace out of having something to blame. I am, admittedly, an unusual person, so this may be symptomatic of that.

I'm not looking for a superficial explanation. I'm looking for serious ways to possibly prevent future incidents, something that our gutless politicians lack the resolve to commit to. I think you do that through the availability of effective mental health, but also through stringent gun control measures... the casualty count in this incident would have been reduced if Rodgers hadn't had a firearm. Same with Lanza and most of these mass-murderer cases.

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
If we really want to talk about possible hindsight assessments, though, both Lanza and Rodgers were fans of first-person shooter games. And play-acting violence only increases violent tendencies (those pop psychologists who told patients to punch a pillow or something eventually found that their patients grew steadily more violent as they unleashed their outbursts). I think it's ridiculous to "blame" video games, but at what point do realistic hunter-killer murder games become culturally worrisome enough? I've had to explain to several people down the years that when I say I play online games, I mean that I'm bloodlessly killing dragons since the popular perception is that I'm talking about Call of Duty or Halo.

Bloodrose already did an excellent job of addressing this. It doesn't make sense to single out video games. America culture is saturated with violence, and not just in the media. Citizens amass armories and bring assault rifles into public restaurants. Police are militarized. America executes its own citizens. We torture prisoners, both foreign nationals and homegrown criminals. We start wars all over the globe, often for spurious reasons, and devastate foreign nations with collateral damage.

As a society, we have got to stop believing that violence solves every problem.
[+]
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
Serveur: Shiva
Game: FFXI
User: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-06-03 16:06:02
Link | Citer | R
 
Sylph.Safiyyah said: »
the casualty count in this incident would have been reduced if Rodgers hadn't had a firearm.
While that's true, he did start out by stabbing to death 3 people. And gun control laws only do so much to limit a determined psychopath.

I'd personally prefer to live in a world where gunpowder doesn't exist, but I am aware that's a fantasy. Here in the real world, so long as guns exist, lunatics who plan their crimes (whether gangbangers or school shooters or 12-year-old girls) will find a way to arm themselves for their purpose.

And there's never going to be a Department of Pre-Crime. While we could use to have a better mental health system (and a host of other factors that reduce other problems -- Lanza and Rodgers were affluent, but most violent crimes are committed by the impoverished, which is something we could alleviate and prevent the subsequent need for corrective therapy), something will always happen and there's really no way to absolutely mitigate it. I really hate gun advocates saying that if everyone was armed, blah-blah-blah, because not only would that not happen, but there is a high probability of additional casualties as a result of stray cross-fire and escalation but it is never addressed.

Unless we want to lobotomize and lock up every human being on the planet, sooner or later we'll have to recognize that threat is always going to exist. And, contrary to what the cable news networks and local news reporters would have us believe, we're safer now than we've ever been.
Offline
Posts: 42782
By Jetackuu 2014-06-03 18:29:35
Link | Citer | R
 
I'm glad somebody brought up Lanza: tell me; what "gun control" (really stripping citizen's of their rights) measurement would you attempt to put in place to prevent such a person from killing others? You do realize that he most likely would have resorted to home made explosives, killing numerous more persons in his delusions, right?

Here's a healthy dose of reality: you cannot stop tragedy, it will happen, regardless of the laws you put on the books. There will always be people who go nuts and try to harm others, until we evolve. It's part of human kind. There are ways to limit it, and the best way to do that is to give people the ability to protect themselves, instead of making them defenseless against lunatics who only wish to harm them.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2014-06-03 18:37:07
Link | Citer | R
 
I blame not being fabulous enough. 300 dollar sunglasses please. 500 dollar or more.
First Page 2 3 ... 12 13
Log in to post.