Gay Fascism On HGTV

Applies to him but not to you? Why's that? Hypocrisy or stupidity, one of the two.

I think it's stupidly hypocritical.

Not even going to bother talking anymore, if I say anything it'll just be "You're *** HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE"

I have to agree, and disagree with this to a point.

Destroying someone's livelihood can cause a great deal of harm to them emotionally, so much so, that the depression that sinks in, can cause indirect physical harm. Or if the situation is severe enough, lead to their suicide.

However, at the same time, making one's beliefs public, that tend to clash with the business owner's or the over-all company's policy/morals, that also conflicts with sales, and customer perception, they end up destroying their own career by trying to justify it, and in some cases, acting on it.

I don't use that kind of vocabulary.

You do though:

Do I care? Like you haven't said worse.

Called you a hypocrite, which you are.

All I did was point out the hypocrisy that you seem so keen on defending. And that it was stupidly hypocritical.

Also, "don't care" is also hypocritical to a religion that claims it cares.

You may be right about "there's only so much turn the other cheek" that one can do, yet the LGBT community can't so much as push back against religious tyranny even a little without being called fascist. You can't cut that much hypocrisy with a *** chainsaw made of adamantium.

Name calling page 4. Mission accomplished.

forgot the use of profanity.

Let's lay down some more facts.

In just about every religion, and religious person I've come across, they've accept that loving someone deeply, regardless of sex, is between those people, and whichever Deity they pray to. It's emotional and spiritual, and can love one another forever.

They just aren't allowed to get married.

Even though by a traditional sense, even in the earliest days of the bible, and of the religion, Holy Union was between two people.

Now, in modern times, after various updates, omissions, and varied interpretations, sects, and subsects of religion, it's ok to be hateful towards a new target, to do everything in your power to ban them from even existing.

So what does the LGBT community do? they push back for EQUAL rights have an EQUAL right to be married, for an EQUAL right to be represented in sports, on television, etc.

But in the mindset of the average (re: moderate to extreme) Christian and Catholic, it's a sin to even exist while being gay. It's been judged to be morally wrong be gay, even though it's the way God made you.

Hell, there was a time when people considered it a sin, an abomination to be UGLY and/or DISFIGURED, and that it was ok to beat those people with stones, throw food at them, and otherwise ostracize them into isolation.

You know, the only thing I haven't seen from real, devout, practicing, even lip-service Christians and Catholics, is the forgiveness they preach, unless it's for themselves.

Why? Because according to the ingrained doctrine, it's still accepted as heresy to believe in another Deity, or not to believe in the "conquering/reigning religion's" Deity.

Pretty sure some are convinced that is Satan's fault. That is why they say you have to search big G, cause only he can teach you the right way of a true heterosexual.

Some may think that way, but Satan's power, even according to the bible, is negative influence over time.

It's already been widely accepted by the top brass in Christian religion that we are, for all intended purposes, made and wired according to his will. So if that's the truth, then those people are wired to believe such a thing, even when they know it to be false.

Wait, Christian, Christian....
Wasn't there something about turning the other cheek? Something like
Hmm, that must have been the non-Christian Jesus.
Way to keep the faith1

Edit: I may have misattributed the verse/quote, I'm certainly no bible scholar. I'll let those who are more familiar correct it.

I wish someone would go through this entire thread and replace "Christian" with "Gay" and "Gay" with "Christian" then see how these very same comments would be tolerated.

Incompatible terms.

congratulations, you've just volunteered.

As this post shows I would simply be wasting my time as people would slam their heads into the sand to ignore their own discriminatory posts.

It works!
(Not picking on you Bacon. It was just the first quote I found.)

Do try and reconcile the terms, but they're more different than they are the same, both in type and historical context. The fact that one is a choice and the other is not is a clear enough difference.

Nope, that doesn't really change the tolerability much, it just makes it a bit odd.

Not one FACT in this entire post, just a bunch of anecdotal evidence. My very point is ... Imagine if someone came in and posted their anecdotal evidence about the LGBT community. It would be deemed offensive and deleted while religion bashing goes unchecked.

Those are all facts, as recorded by history.

It's not some posited *** anecdote, when it's ALL TRUE by virtue of HISTORY.

Edit: That's all that really happens - people post anecdotal evidence as to why they believe the LGBT community is unnatural, is sinful, deserve to be hated and rallied against. There has been virtually no legitimate reason to deny the LGBT community EQUAL RIGHTS to proper representation.

Everything is founded in hatred, indoctrination, and other complete *** that ordinarily, and for decades, if not centuries, has gone unchecked.

So believing in another deity as a christian is not heresy?

Much like everything else, it is the sqeaky wheel that gets the grease. The loud faux news crowd gets the spotlight, and throws the rest of the community under the bus. Most Christians I know don't care what gay people do. They personally hold their beliefs, but don't really seem to deem it necessary to force that belief on others.

Pointing out the hypocrisy of religion, and it's followers, does not bash on religion, or it's followers.

People forget that they are allowed to question their religion, and it's religious leaders. After all, each religion is supposed to be a place of answers that can't be found elsewhere. As long as you're willing to ask questions.

Then again... if you know anything about the story of Adam and Eve, God forbade them from eating the apple, which represented knowledge, while the snake represented temptation. Yet so many confuse the allegory as the snake representing the Devil, and the apple as Temptation.

I was confused by this post. Then I realized it was not Altimaomega.

It amazes me how so many who identify as being in one of the protestant sects, deny a historical fact that organized religions have manipulated the scriptures for personal gains and control of the masses.

In the great words of Britney Spears, "If you seek amy."

My avatar faces left, his faces right!