Questions On The Forthcoming Syria Strike.

Are you able to look at anything without a partisan bias? Vic's 100% correct.

He can't eat crackers without people getting pissed.

Of course I'm correct, and thats why that troll is blocked, he is worthless, just like amandarius, firing blanks at everyone, always wrong.

Decries partisanship and name bashing; Uses the word liberal as a pejorative

And?

The right move just happened, or is happening, and everyone is going to come out looking like winners except for Putin and Nausi, Putin who literally snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and Nausi because he is still living in a fantasy world where Romney carried Florida and Ohio and won the Presidency.

Obama wins because he doesn't have to strike Syria, which is exactly what the American people were in favor of (not striking Syria). Instead, he threatens it, and spurs the world into taking the action they should have a month ago. America doesn't always have to come up with the the peaceful solution, there are 60 or so other countries that signed the chemical weapons treaty and are responsible for enforcing it.
The other real big winner is John Boehner, whose own party makes up the most worthless group of Representatives to ever sit in the House. He doesn't have to put this very controversial strike resolution, that he has publicly supported, up to a vote, which he probably would have lost, again.
Putin would have looked good for having this peaceful idea (something he had to come up with, after stating he wouldn't intervene in a Syrian strike), a thing he is desperate for, considering he is a terrible leader constantly making bad headlines, but he just had to write a pointless article bashing America. Great job accomplishing nothing there Putin.
Our fleet isn't leaving the region, we can still strike at any time if Assad does something stupid again, which he cannot afford to do, because chances are the world, not even the American public, would be so forgiving after giving him a small reprieve here. Meanwhile, the clock continues to tick down on Assad's reign. And Congress has to go back to work.

And?

I'll let you wrestle that one out for yourself.

makes it damn hard for most of us here to take you seriously when you contradict yourself in the same sentence.

I'm sorry, what is partisan about this other than the people being members of different parties? Very little is even remotely opinion.

I'll let you guys go back to the playground, I have grownup things to do.

I'll check back to see if you are still playing nicely.

Assad can say whatever he wants, it doesn't matter. He will do what he is told, nice try tho nausi.

Well, it is not contradicting oneself to decry partisan and name bashing while considering liberalism as something bad.

bolded the partisan statements for you. Also name bashing. Since it is hard for to read a block of text like that.

Nevertheless this is just regurgitating talking points from the left (which, of course, is the number 2 excuse the left accuse anyone who make a case against them).

I think we're all *** for entertaining him, & not giving more credence to this AC / cable TV plan of mine.

(quoted for later)

Lets see how the story progresses. I'm sure Assad was already told how to move forward (by Putin) Vic.

Can't trust those Russians....

So you're saying he stirs ***up for entertainment... How does that make him not a troll?

So you're saying he stirs ***up for entertainment... How does that make him not a troll?

Yeah, lets see. You quote a lot of things for later, but nothing ever comes of it, because this is the real world. I'll fill you in on the details of why Assad has to do what he is told since you continue to live in your own little fantasy world.
If Assad, for any reason, backs out of the deal, then its going to make his only friend in the whole world, Putin, look like a bigger idiot than he already is. Because Putin has backed himself into a corner with this desperate peace deal of his. By writing that stupid op-ed, he is fully banking on the deal going through, because he knows if it doesn't, he has given the US even more reason to strike. And since he has already said he won't intervene in a strike, yep, he better make sure Assad does exactly what he is told.

Yesterday, the resolution probably wouldn't have passed. Tomorrow, it probably would, funny how insulting America never really works out. Assad has a been given an out, if he passes it up, he will literally be alone. Make sure you quote it for later when you have to figure out where it all went wrong for you.

A more accurate conversation would go something like this...

USA - Don't aquire or use gas, it violates international law
Syria - We have gas and we're going to use it
USA - Gassing people will prompt a response
Syria - Someone used gas, it wasn't us
UN - how about we investigate?
Syria - ya sure... Just give us a month or so to hide the evidence
USA - We think it was you and if we find proof, we're going to act
UN - Agreed, let's just find the proof first
Russia - If you act without proof, we'll defend our ally
USA - We have proof
UN - We have proof
Russia - We have a compromise
Syria - But we have conditions
UN - We want to try the participants as war criminals
Russia - No
USA - Good enough

Technically speaking the UN called Russia's bluff. Nobody wanted it to go even this far, but assuming the resolution works, the only people who lost anything are the people who got gassed. (and they faced some of the most horrific conditions imaginable)

I could spend a page and a half linking sources and quoting statements, I gave the condensed version for effect.

No. Not saying anything like that. This war began without our help. We should never be involved especially militarily. That is the first part.

The second part occurs after the President starts flapping his gums and "brandishing threats" at the Syrian government. Once he does that he creates an entirely separate situation with our credibility on the line and his own credibility. His bluff was called and he desperately needed an out. The reason he looks bad no matter what the outcome now is because he looks bad no matter what the outcome now lol. He created this political mess we are in now. It's not me being partisan. The best situation now is that we don't attack, but even that makes him and the United States look pathetic because he opened his mouth and it also elevates Russia.

Decries partisanship and name bashing; Uses the word liberal as a pejorative