Jesus? |
||
|
Jesus?
Coming from a guy who embraces logic and science you certainly don't come to the table with anything more than opinions or assumptions based on your own life experiences...
Cerberus.Eugene said: » Because people fail to grasp the subtleties. Believing in a deity is different from not believing in a deity. Believing in some deity doesn't mean you believe in all deities. Not taking a stance on any deity is different from taking a stance in either direction. You can be agnostic with atheist tendencies, but that doesn't make you strictly atheist. Like wise you can be agnostic with theist tendencies. Thank you, Eugene!!! I don't know why this is so hard for people to understand! Cerberus.Eugene said: » Odin.Tsuneo said: » It doesn't matter if you take a side. If you don't actively believe in a god, you're an atheist. It doesn't matter if you label yourself that. You're still an atheist. I would have to disagree with that table. Phoenix.Sehachan said: » Tsuneo I don't understand why you debate so firmly about that. Labels may be helpful sometimes to help understanding, but they're absolutely superfluous otherwise, they don't matter. I'll agree with both of these I think, but entertain this thought for a moment: maybe the fact that it's so muddied on just a simple definition, and the entire attempt to separate all who aren't theists is just a move to weaken the position of those who don't actively believe? Isn't it bad enough that we're in the minority, and that we all have to fight political religion? I think I'll make a somewhat of a disclaimer for when I'm discussing the matters that I will put on it that I lack the belief in a deity, and that's what I consider atheism, so we don't get into the distracted semantics debate anymore and can possibly focus on other, more meaningful matters? Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Coming from a guy who places his faith in logic in and science you certainly don't come to the table with anything more than opinions or assumptions based on your own life experiences... Exactly! Some people have spilled their guts on here about their personal detachment from God/gods, and that's fine. At least their decision was through a bit of thorough (sometimes agonizing) contemplation and self-evaluation. At least in those cases you can allot a good deal of sympathy or empathy. Compassion is something that some of us share that others don't. I feel sad for those who lack compassion and refuse to even try to understand that their idea of faith, or lack there of, is entirely an individual's own blessing or burden. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Coming from a guy who places his faith in logic in and science you certainly don't come to the table with anything more than opinions or assumptions based on your own life experiences... Exactly! Some people have spilled their guts on here about their personal detachment from God/gods, and that's fine. At least their decision was through a bit of thorough (sometimes agonizing) contemplation and self-evaluation. At least in those cases you can allot a good deal of sympathy or empathy. Compassion is something that some of us share that others don't. I feel sad for those who lack compassion and refuse to even try to understand that their idea of faith, or lack there of, is entirely an individual's own blessing or burden. Understanding and compassion are very different. I understand and for the most part respect people's choice on these types of things, but I am also one of the least compassionate people you will ever have the misfortune to meet. Well, I feel like I need to inject some randomness in here now...
/falls to knees and wails Why can't everyone just be happy?!? /runs out of thread with arms flailing Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Well, I feel like I need to inject some randomness in here now... /falls to knees and wails Why can't everyone just be happy?!? /runs out of thread with arms flailing Falls to knees > runs out. Problem Anatomy? Caitsith.Sai said: » Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Well, I feel like I need to inject some randomness in here now... /falls to knees and wails Why can't everyone just be happy?!? /runs out of thread with arms flailing Falls to knees > runs out. Problem Anatomy? you make it sound like you can't run on your knees... you dont unless you want to screw up your knees. knee caps wherent meant to be used to run with lol
Bahamut.Refreshtwo said: » this is not true secular humanism has been proven to worked and that it will work on world wide level. the myth that you need Religion for charity is just a myth. The philosophy of secular humanism (alternatively known by adherents as Humanism, specifically with a capital H to distinguish it from other forms of humanism) embraces human reason, ethics, and social justice while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience or superstition as the basis of morality and decision-making. Newsflash: Secular humanist thought itself is a 'religious' system. It ejects a deity but still attempts to give you a reason for existing, what you should do in society and why this is important. Hell, some secular humanist societies even have their own equivalent to a church complete with chaplains. We can argue if this is progress but it is a philosophical system to live your life by which sounds pretty damn close to a religion. We can also talk about a world without the monotheisms, a world without the suffering and death caused by clashes of faith but there is no utopia on the other side of the rainbow and whatever religious systems exist 2000 years from now will still have to deal with conflict on some level. All we can do is hope (or work towards) the current religions we have floating around developing into more laid back approaches before we destroy ourselves as a species in the process. Religion will always exist so long as there are unknowns and we have a need to be a part of something greater than our individual. This can be taken as needing to be apart of a great cosmic system (like mainstream religions) or simply apart of a group of like-minded individuals who are good to be around. Quote: A Religion can evolve or die out but if the Religion was perfect and made by a god why did it need to evolve? I say they evolve because history has shown religious belief to evolve but even theist thinkers (who aren't literal on the texts) reach a point where they either adapt some new thought into the belief system or risk losing the flock. Religion doesn't have to be unwavering and many sects are more than happy to adapt beliefs if it suits them. See: Do unbaptized babies go to hell? Does my pet dog Rover need to be baptized to enter heaven? Do pets even go to hell/heaven? Do pets have souls? Why didn't Jesus speak about pets? Leviathan.Phenomena said: » Caitsith.Sai said: » Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Well, I feel like I need to inject some randomness in here now... /falls to knees and wails Why can't everyone just be happy?!? /runs out of thread with arms flailing Falls to knees > runs out. Problem Anatomy? you make it sound like you can't run on your knees... |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||