Democracy!

I don't what?

that statement made no sense...


edit: see your edit.

Try to reread everything I typed and put 2 and 2 together and it will make more sense.

No one remembers Chester A. Arthur.

It has nothing to do with racism. It's just a desperate attempt to exploit a rule of presidency. If a white democrat candidate was thought to have been born in Germany or something, they would be doing the same thing. It's absolutely silly, because this issue has been addressed many times in the past, but please do not play the race card.

P.S. I do not support either of the major parties.
edit: oops messed up quote

You do that.

http://www.privacyisawesome.com/

This guy does!

There are so many other better reasons to hate and not vote for Obama, this issue is just a distraction. Just watch your sewer main media and let them tell you your opinion of things. And where he was born aside, he is still not a natural born citizen, his father is a citizen of Kenya

Imagine... just pretend that Obama was actually born somewhere not in the United States. Ok. What now? Finding that out doesn't come with the ability to change anything that's happened in the past 3+ years. And it's not like "fixing" or "undoing" everything he's done is very likely, either. The government isn't exactly known for it's efficiency and though I'm no expert, I think the task of re-examining every single decision - every piece of paper he signed during his term is beyond its ability. Oh, don't forget, it would also have to govern the present in addition to the past.

And it's not as if it would be all internal, either. Any treaty, agreement, promise, deal made with another country would be subject to question. Every "good" deal the US got wouldn't be honored, but at the same time, everyone who profits by a deal made with the US would demand that we honor it.

Ignoring how ridiculous it is, the time for this is long past. And let's be honest, if you like what he's doing, you don't care where he was born. If you don't like what he's doing, then you don't want him to be President anymore. Luckily, there's a fix to the situation:

Nice try. Cutting off the quote to remove the full context isn't a tactic that works well around people capable of doing a simple Google search.

The full paragraph: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words "all children" are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as "all persons," and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea."

The case did not define a natural-born citizen at all. The opinion of the court was that they didn't give a crap since it wasn't relevant.

Using the nomenclature of the framers of the Constitution:

"a free white person"

*Naturalization Act of 1795

and they still hate him

Dammit, guess I gotta leave. Who wants my stuff?

Pleebo for President!

Before we start campaigning, let me clear my browser history...