Christians: We Arent Trying To Condemn Anyone

Langues: JP EN DE FR
Yellow Box
5516 users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » christians: we arent trying to condemn anyone
christians: we arent trying to condemn anyone
First Page 2 3 ... 20 21 22 ... 23 24 25
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2012-01-17 13:43:37
Link | Citer | R
 
It's hard to direct anger or dissatisfaction of the numerous injustices in the world that have primary or even secondary involvement in religion that happens worldwide and on a regular basis.

Also it's difficult to put that anger in perspective from the other side of the table and not take it as one would a personal attack on one's faith or beliefs. There is a lot to be angry about when it comes to religion in general and the events that circumvent from it's teachings and dogma. Of course such things are relative and are often based on an individual or group of individuals that misinterpret or willingly or even unwillingly corrupt various passages and texts to usher political gain and rousal of others to support their own selfish cause.

All I can say is a lot of horrible things happen in the name of religion, and there really is too much diversity and variables to point the finger at any particular person or group, or even the religion itself; because religion is a freedom of sorts that fundamentally should be a just basis for an individual's lifestyle...assuming it doesn't infringe on the rights and liberties of others.

I'm sure all of us have seen how well that turned out.
So what we end up with is a big intense misdirected stream of hatred for one another that becomes counter productive to what we are actually trying to say or believe in.

As an atheist of sorts, I think it's a duty to sort out the mess and make a sound and reasonable understanding of our "anger" before it lashes out to harm a group or individual, lest it becomes misdirected and circumvents in what has been essentially a war of minds for centuries.


WOOT FIRST PAGE!
[+]
 Ramuh.Sagittario
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
User: Sagi
Posts: 16303
By Ramuh.Sagittario 2012-01-17 13:44:31
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Proving God does or does not exist... I can see where both sides have a say in who needs to prove or disprove it.

I don't even...

LE SIGH.

A claim needs to have evidence before the evidence can be examined and 'disproven', though nothing can be 'disproven' anyways and just dismissed. Why is that so hard to grasp?

If I claimed I owned a dragon, I have to provide evidence for that claim before it can be valid, because it is an extraordinary claim.

THISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 13:44:50
Link | Citer | R
 
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
On the atheist and progressive movements, it's hard to explain a movement that has no central nervous system yet. I'll try and figure out how to explain it.

Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Sounds like typical atheistic rhetoric to me. You have yet to tell me why it is MY responsibility to prove to YOU that he exists.

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.

While I disagree partially with Saggi, the gist is the same: absence of proof is not proof of absence, however that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Once again, you don't get it. You atheists have this smug thought that I have to do anything you ask. I believe and that is good enough for me. I don't have to justify MY beliefs to YOU. If you want to honestly learn about God, than I will answer questions.

We want to learn why you believe in God. It's not enough to just say "Oh well nevermind I believe and that's that, if you don't that's your problem" and avoid answering questions you know you can't answer.

Why? Why do you believe in God? Give us actual reasons.

Why, last time I gave my reasons, I was assaulted in a 20 atheists to 1 theists argument, and because all 20 of you were on the same page you declare, falsely, a victory. It would be the same situation with 20 theists versus 1 atheist, you would all expect me to individually address your back to back to back posts every 20 seconds and failure to address one now becomes your "victory."

And after that is done, you will call MY reasons ridiculous, which automatically invalidates your stance, because they are MY reasons and not yours.

That depends Evandis, if your reasons are because you had sunny weather for a week and your crops were prosperous then yes I'll state my opinion, you can't preach that you are entitled to believe and we are not entitled to ours.

Why don't you actually just give me some reasons why you believe in God and we will go from there.

How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

The fact that I cannot truly rationalize why life would even start for it to be nothing but a trip to death?

My dad has pancreatic cancer, that's pretty much a game over. I was so mad at God and believed he didn't exist until a fellow Christian pointed out that blaming all the bad on God was letting the devil off easy. I joined in with all the people praying for him, and while nothing is a guarantee, knock on wood, he was one of the very few rare people to catch the cancer in stage 1 and to respond to the treatments so well. You will tell me coincidence, I don't believe that much in coincidence, a lot of people prayed for him, and he stayed devoted to God the whole time.

The Bible says God will provide for his people when they need it if you never lose faith in him. There have been many times in my life where I didn't think I was going to make the bills or be able to pay for food, and each and every time I asked God to look out for me and my loved ones and help me find the path, and each and every time something happened that made getting through that week possible.

The problem with the evidence you want and the evidence people who believe have, is they follow two different criteria.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 13:46:38
Link | Citer | R
 
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Quote:
Honestly, Im trying to figure out what it is that the atheist movement does. I mean, I honestly expected about 20 links and a list of programs when I asked you about the programs instated by atheists to improve communities and peoples lives. Instead you told that you want to teach children about evolution and then commented on how theists block you from coming up with cures for diseases.

Here's how I can explain it: atheists aren't bonding together to do stuff because they're atheists, except in matters of atheist civil rights and such. In those aspects, we have American Atheists, the Freedom From Religious Foundation, and the ACLU working to stop the spread of religiosity in public forums and protect the rights of atheists when it need happen. The primary battle right now is in the field of public school.

On the social aspect, American Atheists is currently running a 'coming out' campaign to encourage more people to come out to their families--if they deem it safe--and to show atheists that they are not alone. Through the last.. 3(?) years I've been following it, one of the most major fears I have seen young atheists profess is telling their families and friends. Hell, on reddit alone in the atheism section, there's at least 3-5 posts a day about parents flipping shits at their kids for not believing the Jesus Juice.

Atheists also tend to support progressive social movements on their own accords. Conservative atheists are incredibly rare, in my experience and the experience of those I know.

If you want one example of a big charity campaign, this year the atheist community organized a donation drive of $200,000 to Doctors Without Borders.

There is an effort by some atheists to organize atheists into a more focused group, but there is currently debate if that is the right decision or so.

Thing is, you probably won't ever see a movement in the name of atheism, besides the DWB drive.

Atheists aren't having a coming out party, they are having an assault on religion party. You argue for wanting to not be attacked for your beliefs, by attacking others for your beliefs.

It will never be smooth sailing with your current plan of action. The moment you attack Christianity, you are just uniting us in a cause for defense. To claim to be socially proactive, but yet biased and judging, is a hypocrisy in itself.

You lash out at Christians, but be thankful that we aren't in the Middle East and dealing with Islamic people, because unlike these horrible Christian people and their horrible Christian laws, the Islamic faith runs the government and you actually would be stoned to death for the comments you make.

Yet Christianity judges that we will be sent to hell if we do not believe in God. That despite being granted free will we MUST believe in God or be denied entry into 'heaven'. That sounds pretty biased towards religion to me.

How is that biased, you took everything completely out of context and zeroed in on the one part that makes it sound evil.
Offline
Posts: 7516
By Eugene 2012-01-17 13:47:43
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.
I love how many times this has been quoted despite being a false analogy, there are scientists who claim to believe in string theory without complete evidence. There are scientists who claim dark energy exists, with the only evidence of scientific models showing that something isn't accounting for why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

Dark energy is simply a term used to state that science doesn't understand why the universe works the way it does. However, they way its put forth makes it sound to the casual listener that it is some definitive force.

There are plenty of unknowns that scientists believe in, and will try and argue as fitting into scientific theory.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:47:57
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

I think you're looking at that from the wrong side of the argument. Did you ever notice that puddles often form in holes in the road?
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:48:33
Link | Citer | R
 
Eugene said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.
I love how many times this has been quoted despite being a false analogy, there are scientists who claim to believe in string theory without complete evidence. There are scientists who claim dark energy exists, with the only evidence of scientific models showing that something isn't accounting for why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

Dark energy is simply a term used to state that science doesn't understand why the universe works the way it does. However, they way its put forth makes it sound to the casual listener that it is some definitive force.

There are plenty of unknowns that scientists believe in, and will try and argue as fitting into scientific theory.

Fine, I shouldn't have used string theory, but the point still stands.
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2012-01-17 13:49:53
Link | Citer | R
 
Hold the phone buddy.
Science doesn't really dictate anything.
Science revolves around theories that begin with a reasonable hypothesis that undergoes various observations and tests before it can be considered remotely plausible, which is further researched and tested to build a foundation of knowledge to the point where one can consider it a fact of life.

The difference here is religion is more or less written in stone and set forth as an absolution despite being so vague and containing countless perspectives of interpretation and versions existing from one point of view to another.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 13:50:51
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

I think you're looking at that from the wrong side of the argument. Did you ever notice that puddles often form in holes in the road?

This sort of comment is basically saying "if you aren't looking at it from my side, you are wrong."

I routinely look at things from all side. Whether you choose to believe it or not, I am very educated person, I have a tested high IQ, I understand science, math, I hold a couple of degrees and certifications. I have decided that neither religion nor science can answer the how or why. I have decided science can answer the how and religion can answer the why. If I am foolish for believing in God, than so are many of your precious scientists.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:51:57
Link | Citer | R
 
Also:

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

Then what made God?

Maybe the default state is 'exists' rather than 'not exists' /shrug. We're still working on those answers. We've only been at Science with the resources it needs for a few decades, when you think about it.

My dad has pancreatic cancer, that's pretty much a game over. I was so mad at God and believed he didn't exist until a fellow Christian pointed out that blaming all the bad on God was letting the devil off easy. I joined in with all the people praying for him, and while nothing is a guarantee, knock on wood, he was one of the very few rare people to catch the cancer in stage 1 and to respond to the treatments so well. You will tell me coincidence, I don't believe that much in coincidence, a lot of people prayed for him, and he stayed devoted to God the whole time.

The Bible says God will provide for his people when they need it if you never lose faith in him. There have been many times in my life where I didn't think I was going to make the bills or be able to pay for food, and each and every time I asked God to look out for me and my loved ones and help me find the path, and each and every time something happened that made getting through that week possible.


And this part just pisses me off. You worked hard for your food, I assume. Or people maybe helped you, out of the goodness of their hearts. Those doctors and surgeons trained for years to make sue that when people like your father walk in that they have a shot at saving him from the mess the human body is.

But God saved him. I find it strange when people attribute all the beautiful things in life to God, but forget about the worm eating through the eyeball of a small child; that can't be God, no.

Sigh.
[+]
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-17 13:52:26
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Proving God does or does not exist... I can see where both sides have a say in who needs to prove or disprove it.
I don't even... LE SIGH. A claim needs to have evidence before the evidence can be examined and 'disproven', though nothing can be 'disproven' anyways and just dismissed. Why is that so hard to grasp? If I claimed I owned a dragon, I have to provide evidence for that claim before it can be valid, because it is an extraordinary claim.
Only if you want others to believe in it as well. Many of the people I know don't go around shoving their beliefs down peoples throats as you seem to think all theists do. They have their own personal faith that he does exist even though they openly admit they have no proof.

It's like saying, prove to me that you will catch me if I fall back with my eyes closed. I can't prove that you will actually catch me but based on my experience with you and my own personal thoughts I can decide to believe that you will or won't.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2012-01-17 13:53:33
Link | Citer | R
 
Eugene said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.
I love how many times this has been quoted despite being a false analogy, there are scientists who claim to believe in string theory without complete evidence. There are scientists who claim dark energy exists, with the only evidence of scientific models showing that something isn't accounting for why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

Dark energy is simply a term used to state that science doesn't understand why the universe works the way it does. However, they way its put forth makes it sound to the casual listener that it is some definitive force.

There are plenty of unknowns that scientists believe in, and will try and argue as fitting into scientific theory.

I think the key here is asserting that whatever it is that is unknown is presently tangible and observable from human perspective and tools that it retains various qualities suitable for a name of vague definition. It can be rather frustrating to see something, know of its existence, observe its capacity and effects yet ultimately fall short of being able to explain in detail the functions or makeup of what it is.
Offline
Posts: 7516
By Eugene 2012-01-17 13:53:40
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Eugene said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.
I love how many times this has been quoted despite being a false analogy, there are scientists who claim to believe in string theory without complete evidence. There are scientists who claim dark energy exists, with the only evidence of scientific models showing that something isn't accounting for why the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

Dark energy is simply a term used to state that science doesn't understand why the universe works the way it does. However, they way its put forth makes it sound to the casual listener that it is some definitive force.

There are plenty of unknowns that scientists believe in, and will try and argue as fitting into scientific theory.

Fine, I shouldn't have used string theory, but the point still stands.

What I will give you is that science does a much better job at dismissing incorrect beliefs when enough evidence is present to discredit a theory.
 Ramuh.Sagittario
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
User: Sagi
Posts: 16303
By Ramuh.Sagittario 2012-01-17 13:53:48
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
On the atheist and progressive movements, it's hard to explain a movement that has no central nervous system yet. I'll try and figure out how to explain it.

Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Sounds like typical atheistic rhetoric to me. You have yet to tell me why it is MY responsibility to prove to YOU that he exists.

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.

While I disagree partially with Saggi, the gist is the same: absence of proof is not proof of absence, however that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Once again, you don't get it. You atheists have this smug thought that I have to do anything you ask. I believe and that is good enough for me. I don't have to justify MY beliefs to YOU. If you want to honestly learn about God, than I will answer questions.

We want to learn why you believe in God. It's not enough to just say "Oh well nevermind I believe and that's that, if you don't that's your problem" and avoid answering questions you know you can't answer.

Why? Why do you believe in God? Give us actual reasons.

Why, last time I gave my reasons, I was assaulted in a 20 atheists to 1 theists argument, and because all 20 of you were on the same page you declare, falsely, a victory. It would be the same situation with 20 theists versus 1 atheist, you would all expect me to individually address your back to back to back posts every 20 seconds and failure to address one now becomes your "victory."

And after that is done, you will call MY reasons ridiculous, which automatically invalidates your stance, because they are MY reasons and not yours.

That depends Evandis, if your reasons are because you had sunny weather for a week and your crops were prosperous then yes I'll state my opinion, you can't preach that you are entitled to believe and we are not entitled to ours.

Why don't you actually just give me some reasons why you believe in God and we will go from there.

How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

The fact that I cannot truly rationalize why life would even start for it to be nothing but a trip to death?

My dad has pancreatic cancer, that's pretty much a game over. I was so mad at God and believed he didn't exist until a fellow Christian pointed out that blaming all the bad on God was letting the devil off easy. I joined in with all the people praying for him, and while nothing is a guarantee, knock on wood, he was one of the very few rare people to catch the cancer in stage 1 and to respond to the treatments so well. You will tell me coincidence, I don't believe that much in coincidence, a lot of people prayed for him, and he stayed devoted to God the whole time.

The Bible says God will provide for his people when they need it if you never lose faith in him. There have been many times in my life where I didn't think I was going to make the bills or be able to pay for food, and each and every time I asked God to look out for me and my loved ones and help me find the path, and each and every time something happened that made getting through that week possible.

The problem with the evidence you want and the evidence people who believe have, is they follow two different criteria.

WEll, I have to admit, those are some questions worth thinking about for sure, I also find myself thinking deeply about the origins of life and it's purpose, but unlike religion, I believe that there was something but I choose to not go any further than that in terms of what that something was because we do not know. Unfortunately though this is still not evidence of a God, as there are infinite possibilities.

I'm sorry to hear about health problem within a family, but again there are just as many people who are not religious who are just lucky. Look at Lance Armstrong for a serious example of being on a deathbed.

Again, praying then having opportunities present themselves is like you say, coincidence, not evidence. It's not enough. For you it is, but for me, occurences like this are chance. Like pulling up to a traffic light and it turning green just as I get there. I don't thank God, I thank my lucky stars.
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:53:57
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

I think you're looking at that from the wrong side of the argument. Did you ever notice that puddles often form in holes in the road?

This sort of comment is basically saying "if you aren't looking at it from my side, you are wrong."

No, you just want to jump at me from this one. I was unable to wrap my head around our existence for 5 years of my life when I looked at it that way, until I realized something:

The hole was not made for the puddle: the water drops drift into the hole and get stuck because the hole in the road is an ideal condition for the puddle to be.

By that I mean to say, with the vast expanses of the universe, it was bound to happen sooner or later. We exist because, like the puddle, it worked out to be a good environment to exist. We are not the result; we're just a product.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 13:54:31
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Also:

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

Then what made God?

Maybe the default state is 'exists' rather than 'not exists' /shrug. We're still working on those answers. We've only been at Science with the resources it needs for a few decades, when you think about it.

My dad has pancreatic cancer, that's pretty much a game over. I was so mad at God and believed he didn't exist until a fellow Christian pointed out that blaming all the bad on God was letting the devil off easy. I joined in with all the people praying for him, and while nothing is a guarantee, knock on wood, he was one of the very few rare people to catch the cancer in stage 1 and to respond to the treatments so well. You will tell me coincidence, I don't believe that much in coincidence, a lot of people prayed for him, and he stayed devoted to God the whole time.

The Bible says God will provide for his people when they need it if you never lose faith in him. There have been many times in my life where I didn't think I was going to make the bills or be able to pay for food, and each and every time I asked God to look out for me and my loved ones and help me find the path, and each and every time something happened that made getting through that week possible.


And this part just pisses me off. You worked hard for your food, I assume. Or people maybe helped you, out of the goodness of their hearts. Those doctors and surgeons trained for years to make sue that when people like your father walk in that they have a shot at saving him from the mess the human body is.

But God saved him. I find it strange when people attribute all the beautiful things in life to God, but forget about the worm eating through the eyeball of a small child; that can't be God, no.

Sigh.

How about you look at the mortality rate of pancreatic cancer. Those doctors didn't invent chemotherapy. If his good fortune was 100% based on the doctors and treatment and science behind it, then why do people still die from it?

And as far as your comment about the worm, well if you believe in God, then you believe in the devil and if you blame everything on God, then you let the devil off pretty easy.
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:55:35
Link | Citer | R
 
Because cancer is a very ferocious problem that we still don't fully know how to approach? Those doctors still put in years of hard *** work for you to just discredit them that way.

And -__________________- at the devil and god thing.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 7516
By Eugene 2012-01-17 13:56:44
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Also:

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

Then what made God?

Maybe the default state is 'exists' rather than 'not exists' /shrug. We're still working on those answers. We've only been at Science with the resources it needs for a few decades, when you think about it.

What created the big bang? Neither discipline is currently prepared to answer this question.
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2012-01-17 13:57:26
Link | Citer | R
 
You guys reminded me, I forgot to install folding@home.
BRB
Offline
Posts: 20643
By slipispsycho 2012-01-17 13:57:43
Link | Citer | R
 
Sounds a lot like superstition to me.. Everything good that happens is from God, and everything bad that happens is from Satan.

Why can't good and bad things just happen.. Why does there have to be something pulling the strings and making it happen?
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 13:58:37
Link | Citer | R
 
Eugene said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Also:

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

Then what made God?

Maybe the default state is 'exists' rather than 'not exists' /shrug. We're still working on those answers. We've only been at Science with the resources it needs for a few decades, when you think about it.

What created the big bang? Neither discipline is currently prepared to answer this question.

Doesn't mean God did it. Not sure what you're getting at, though, besides the turtles-all-the-way-down bit.

We're still working on it. What's your point? I don't understand.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 13:59:48
Link | Citer | R
 
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ramuh.Sagittario said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
On the atheist and progressive movements, it's hard to explain a movement that has no central nervous system yet. I'll try and figure out how to explain it.

Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Sounds like typical atheistic rhetoric to me. You have yet to tell me why it is MY responsibility to prove to YOU that he exists.

Because you claimed he exists.

The burden of proof rests on you, because of that. It's not a difficult situation.

If a scientist came out and said "String theory is true!" he would have to show supporting evidence for it. He made a claim, ergo he has to prove it for being valid.

While I disagree partially with Saggi, the gist is the same: absence of proof is not proof of absence, however that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Once again, you don't get it. You atheists have this smug thought that I have to do anything you ask. I believe and that is good enough for me. I don't have to justify MY beliefs to YOU. If you want to honestly learn about God, than I will answer questions.

We want to learn why you believe in God. It's not enough to just say "Oh well nevermind I believe and that's that, if you don't that's your problem" and avoid answering questions you know you can't answer.

Why? Why do you believe in God? Give us actual reasons.

Why, last time I gave my reasons, I was assaulted in a 20 atheists to 1 theists argument, and because all 20 of you were on the same page you declare, falsely, a victory. It would be the same situation with 20 theists versus 1 atheist, you would all expect me to individually address your back to back to back posts every 20 seconds and failure to address one now becomes your "victory."

And after that is done, you will call MY reasons ridiculous, which automatically invalidates your stance, because they are MY reasons and not yours.

That depends Evandis, if your reasons are because you had sunny weather for a week and your crops were prosperous then yes I'll state my opinion, you can't preach that you are entitled to believe and we are not entitled to ours.

Why don't you actually just give me some reasons why you believe in God and we will go from there.

How about I don't believe in all the cosmic chances that would have to take place for us to exist and have a planet capable of supporting us, almost indefinitely with moderation and without the proposed explosion of our son in 6 billion years?

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

The fact that I cannot truly rationalize why life would even start for it to be nothing but a trip to death?

My dad has pancreatic cancer, that's pretty much a game over. I was so mad at God and believed he didn't exist until a fellow Christian pointed out that blaming all the bad on God was letting the devil off easy. I joined in with all the people praying for him, and while nothing is a guarantee, knock on wood, he was one of the very few rare people to catch the cancer in stage 1 and to respond to the treatments so well. You will tell me coincidence, I don't believe that much in coincidence, a lot of people prayed for him, and he stayed devoted to God the whole time.

The Bible says God will provide for his people when they need it if you never lose faith in him. There have been many times in my life where I didn't think I was going to make the bills or be able to pay for food, and each and every time I asked God to look out for me and my loved ones and help me find the path, and each and every time something happened that made getting through that week possible.

The problem with the evidence you want and the evidence people who believe have, is they follow two different criteria.

WEll, I have to admit, those are some questions worth thinking about for sure, I also find myself thinking deeply about the origins of life and it's purpose, but unlike religion, I believe that there was something but I choose to not go any further than that in terms of what that something was because we do not know. Unfortunately though this is still not evidence of a God, as there are infinite possibilities.

I'm sorry to hear about health problem within a family, but again there are just as many people who are not religious who are just lucky. Look at Lance Armstrong for a serious example of being on a deathbed.

Again, praying then having opportunities present themselves is like you say, coincidence, not evidence. It's not enough. For you it is, but for me, occurences like this are chance. Like pulling up to a traffic light and it turning green just as I get there. I don't thank God, I thank my lucky stars.

You are never going to get an honest answer from a sane Christian that will meet the burden you have set. God doesn't talk to man anymore, for a long story that would devolve into blaming the Jews, so we won't go too in depth with it. So not one sane person, who is Christian and actually bothered to read the scriptures is going to tell you he saw God, or that God told him to do something, or that Jesus appeared to him.

And let's say that God did still talk to man, let's say someone was really talked to by God. This would be 100% proof of his existence, especially to the people it happened to, but everyone else would just call them crazy. So there is the problem with the whole request for evidence, if any real evidence we could use exists, and I don't know if there is or not, you would dismiss it, so the atheistic side has made it impossible for the Christian side to win and that is why most of us have our faith for ourselves and don't push it off on people not interested.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 14:01:45
Link | Citer | R
 
Psycho Slip said: »
Sounds a lot like superstition to me.. Everything good that happens is from God, and everything bad that happens is from Satan.

Why can't good and bad things just happen.. Why does there have to be something pulling the strings and making it happen?

Look, I don't mean any offense, but this is a dumb comment. It's just like comments made by religious people that they just believe and you find foolish. It's a comment that only one side will embrace and no answer from the other side will satisfy your wonderment.

For those who believe in God, it makes 100% sense to them if they know the scriptures. For those who don't it makes no sense. So why ask the question?
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 14:02:02
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
You are never going to get an honest answer from a sane Christian that will meet the burden you have set. God doesn't talk to man anymore, for a long story that would devolve into blaming the Jews, so we won't go too in depth with it. So not one sane person, who is Christian and actually bothered to read the scriptures is going to tell you he saw God, or that God told him to do something, or that Jesus appeared to him.

Haha, there's room for an awesome joke in there.

But coming from the person that doesn't think this could possibly have all happened by chance, doesn't that just sound a little too convenient? :|
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-17 14:03:46
Link | Citer | R
 
In a way, I feel sorry for people that only go to Holy Books for the answer. There's a handful of them. It seems they miss out on the joy of a library full of books, and all they have to offer.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 14:03:53
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
You are never going to get an honest answer from a sane Christian that will meet the burden you have set. God doesn't talk to man anymore, for a long story that would devolve into blaming the Jews, so we won't go too in depth with it. So not one sane person, who is Christian and actually bothered to read the scriptures is going to tell you he saw God, or that God told him to do something, or that Jesus appeared to him.

Haha, there's room for an awesome joke in there.

But coming from the person that doesn't think this could possibly have all happened by chance, doesn't that just sound a little too convenient? :|

I guess I had enough foresight to travel in time and alter the Bible to state that God no longer talks to man for this very day.
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2012-01-17 14:04:50
Link | Citer | R
 
If I've learned anything about religion, it's that it appears to be the most convenient route in justifying and explaining the unknowns in life along with the cause and effect that would be otherwise unexplained.
Not everything in life requires an answer, nor does it require some sort of tangible, spiritual embodiment that epitomizes good or evil therein.
Offline
By zahrah 2012-01-17 14:05:31
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Psycho Slip said: »
Sounds a lot like superstition to me.. Everything good that happens is from God, and everything bad that happens is from Satan.

Why can't good and bad things just happen.. Why does there have to be something pulling the strings and making it happen?

Look, I don't mean any offense, but this is a dumb comment. It's just like comments made by religious people that they just believe and you find foolish. It's a comment that only one side will embrace and no answer from the other side will satisfy your wonderment.

For those who believe in God, it makes 100% sense to them if they know the scriptures. For those who don't it makes no sense. So why ask the question?

Ummm...Slip is agnostic too. Just throwing that out there.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-17 14:06:05
Link | Citer | R
 
Artemicion said: »
If I've learned anything about religion, it's that it appears to be the most convenient route in justifying and explaining the unknowns in life along with the cause and effect that would be otherwise unexplained.
Not everything in life requires an answer, nor does it require some sort of tangible, spiritual embodiment that epitomizes good or evil therein.

That's an opinion and not a fact.

What I find ironic about that statement, is if not everything in life requires an answer, than why do both sides of the fence go looking for them.
Offline
Posts: 7516
By Eugene 2012-01-17 14:06:37
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Eugene said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Also:

How about the fact that science itself dictates to me that from nothing can come nothing, so there has to be some sort of outside force or divine being that triggered this universe? I call Him God.

Then what made God?

Maybe the default state is 'exists' rather than 'not exists' /shrug. We're still working on those answers. We've only been at Science with the resources it needs for a few decades, when you think about it.

What created the big bang? Neither discipline is currently prepared to answer this question.

Doesn't mean God did it. Not sure what you're getting at, though, besides the turtles-all-the-way-down bit.

We're still working on it. What's your point? I don't understand.
You brought God to the source, the efficient cause. I just brought the universe there. I'm not discrediting science, I'm just saying science is no better position to answer that one. You claim you need evidence to argue for a God, I'm saying I think there are better arguments against God than arguments that science can't answer either.

on a side note.

There's a good chance we won't find out the answers to a lot of questions. A few billion years from now any civilization that might exist won't be able to inductively reason that the universe is expanding, nor come up with the big bang theory. That's because the universe is expanding at faster than the speed of light, and at some point the universe will expand further than the spectrum of information we have. We live at a fortunate time in the universe.
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 20 21 22 ... 23 24 25
Log in to post.