Christians: We Arent Trying To Condemn Anyone

Langues: JP EN DE FR
Yellow Box
5057 users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » christians: we arent trying to condemn anyone
christians: we arent trying to condemn anyone
First Page 2 3 ... 11 12 13 ... 23 24 25
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-01-16 03:16:58
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »

First of all, my faith is in God, not the Bible. At one point God dictated a perfect version and if I ever find it, we can have a debate as to what God really is saying.

Look at the Middle East, so many of those men think it is okay to oppress women and treat them as second rate. That's how they were raised, unfortunately. You are conditioned by everything. Where you live. When you live. Who you live with. Who you live next to. In this case God conditioned the Israelites to this. I am not going to pretend that I would feel the exact same way about it 2000, 4000 years ago when the Earth was a different place.

If you reject the Bible as being corrupted then you've destroyed any leg you had to stand on and have ventured into heresy. Be glad you're born in this time where the religious fundies can't burn you alive for making statements you've made. The 'perfect' form of the Bible? If we don't have it then God has doomed everyone to Hell due to a lack of the proper reading materials or we've been making it up as we go along.

An all powerful divine being who embodies good would not be so incompetent as to let his masterpiece fall out of the sights of men. Cmon.

Without the Bible as a compass your faith is merely a projection of the time period you live in. Had you been born in the Middle East you'd be Islamic with Allah at your back, Odin had you been born in Scandinavia or perhaps a Wiccan in our present day. You only know Christianity because you were likely born into it much like out there in the jungles of Brazil native peoples live with beliefs of spirits in the animals and trees.

The Middle East is the way it is precisely because of their religious beliefs which aren't too far from what Christianity was during the age of converting pagans by the sword. Christians like to point and yell "barbarians" but what the fundamentalist Islamic leaders do now was no different than what Christians did in the New World a few generations back.

History, don't ignore it.
[+]
 Bismarck.Rharmony
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Rharmon
Posts: 589
By Bismarck.Rharmony 2012-01-16 03:17:02
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Yomisha said: »
Bismarck.Rharmony said: »
But there is a godzilla D:<
Someone mentioned godzilla!? :O

There be documentaries proving he be real. >:I
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2012-01-16 03:17:06
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
I have no problem saying it, for the same reason people have no problem engaging in homosexuality, it's their belief. Just because a homosexual doesn't think homosexuality is wrong, doesn't mean they are right. It's a two way street, because you are going to tell me that just because I think homosexuality is wrong, doesn't mean I am right.

When we die, we either get to ask God ourselves or never have to worry about it again, cause this life was all we got.

Until then, I choose the high road, I disagree with homosexuality, but that doesn't mean I dislike homosexuals or find them appalling. In fact I count them among my friends. It's their life to live.

This part I can sorta agree with.

You consider not being gay or participating in homosexual acts as the high road. Is this not a case of judging someone else, rather than letting god be the judge?

That's not what I said at all. I consider not interfering with their personal choices and not choosing to wish ill will or animosity on them just because of those choices as the high road.

Bump.
So the high road is not interfering with their personal choices and not choosing to wish ill will or w/e on them.

I mean if you follow the flow of language it appears like this:

Quote:
I think homosexuality is wrong, doesn't mean I am right.

When we die, we either get to ask God ourselves or never have to worry about it again, cause this life was all we got.

Until then, I choose the high road, I disagree with homosexuality, but that doesn't mean I dislike homosexuals or find them appalling.

Which implies not being a homosexual is the high road.

Possibly a communication error...
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2012-01-16 03:17:23
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-16 03:17:23
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

If I hated him, I would not be preaching.

More than anything, I feel full of sorrow. I am full of sadness for Evandis.

And above that a notch, I have forgiveness.

I'm kind of like the Tenth Doctor.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:17:42
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
You are part of the problem. You call religion fake and imaginary and yet, you cannot, under your own empirical standards of evidence, possibly disprove God.

This is your fallacy, you don't admit to the possibility of being wrong. I could be wrong. I don't think I am, but there is always the possibility of me being wrong.

Until then, you should go away and think about what it would take for you to empirically prove me wrong.

Someone doesn't understand how claims work! The claim is that God exists: the ball is in your court to prove he does exist before someone can reassess data to say "Nope, wrong."

You can't disprove Russel's Teapot, The Invisible Pink Unicorn, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, or The Dragon in my Garage. You can't disprove Garden Gnomes, you can't disprove Shoe Faeries, you can't disprove Nessie, you can't disprove Godzilla. What's your point?

In the absence of evidence, why the *** should we have any ounce of faith in something?

I admit the possibility of being wrong, but so long as there's no proof for any of that ***, the only logical stance is "Nope, no Gnomes. No God. No Unicorns."

No one is saying you have to have faith. That's your choice. But the lack of evidence isn't proof that something doesn't exist or didn't happen.
Offline
Posts: 845
By Powerslave 2012-01-16 03:17:51
Link | Citer | R
 
As much as I disagree with pretty much everything Evandis said and I kind of truthfully think he's a douche, I think you guys are taking it a bit far on the homosexuality thing.

If he considers it a sin, leave him be. He's not spewing hatred or nonsense about how he wants to save their confused soul from hell. Yes his view is a bit bigoted in my opinion, but believe it or not his opinion is one a lot of people have, but that does not necessarily stop them from being friends with someone who is gay or actually hate and discriminate against them.
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-16 03:17:55
Link | Citer | R
 
Bismarck.Rharmony said: »
But there is a godzilla D:<
I am in agreement with this statement. Him and king kong play poker together.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-16 03:18:49
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
You are part of the problem. You call religion fake and imaginary and yet, you cannot, under your own empirical standards of evidence, possibly disprove God.

This is your fallacy, you don't admit to the possibility of being wrong. I could be wrong. I don't think I am, but there is always the possibility of me being wrong.

Until then, you should go away and think about what it would take for you to empirically prove me wrong.

Someone doesn't understand how claims work! The claim is that God exists: the ball is in your court to prove he does exist before someone can reassess data to say "Nope, wrong."

You can't disprove Russel's Teapot, The Invisible Pink Unicorn, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, or The Dragon in my Garage. You can't disprove Garden Gnomes, you can't disprove Shoe Faeries, you can't disprove Nessie, you can't disprove Godzilla. What's your point?

In the absence of evidence, why the *** should we have any ounce of faith in something?

I admit the possibility of being wrong, but so long as there's no proof for any of that ***, the only logical stance is "Nope, no Gnomes. No God. No Unicorns."

No one is saying you have to have faith. That's your choice. But the lack of evidence isn't proof that something doesn't exist or didn't happen.

If there's no evidence, there's no reason to believe it. Why should we?
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2012-01-16 03:19:42
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
You have to give me a few minutes, I'm still taking in that last statement.

I don't understand what is so difficult to take in about disagreeing with homosexuality but not hating homosexuals.

I believe it is against nature, science is actually in my favor on that one. I also cannot understand how a man can be attracted to another man that way and I can openly admit that I never will and shouldn't bother trying, since I will never be attracted to another man. The greatest fallacy here is a heterosexual expecting a homosexual to understand something they cannot, and vice versa.

Outside of homosexuality, they all have feelings, goals, ambitions, desires. They work jobs and pay taxes. They generally are nice people. Why do I have to hate the person, because I disagree with an act that I am not even taking part in anyway?
The problem is you condemn homosexuality and yet condone homosexuals in the same breath.

I don't condemn. Show me where I condemn. Show me where I said they were guaranteed a trip to hell for this. Since you cannot, I will point to you where I blatantly said that I believe homosexuals have a chance at forgiveness.

By saying saying that homosexuals must be forgiven of their sin of homosexuality in order to be considered for heaven.

That translate to homosexuality is a sin.

Right, you did say that god forbids it right?

I'll ask you again, Is homosexuality a sin?

Yes, homosexuality is a sin.

However, you make it sound like homosexuals are given a raw deal in having to be forgiven for the sin of homosexuality.

I have to be forgiven for the sin of premarital sex. I have to be forgiven for the sin of having a child out of wedlock.

God forbids all that too and just like a homosexual, I have the possibility of being forgiven.

You make it sound like homosexuality is the only thing God calls a sin and that they are specifically being singled out with the word sin. They are not.

Outside of blasphemy, all sins can be forgiven, all sins are on the same level. We are all sinners, no matter what Westboro may believe.
If you recall in the beginning we are starting with one law at a time, remember?

Saying homosexuality is a sin, is in fact condemning it.
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-16 03:19:46
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

If I hated him, I would not be preaching.

More than anything, I feel full of sorrow. I am full of sadness for Evandis.

And above that a notch, I have forgiveness.

I'm kind of like the Tenth Doctor.
Wasn't really directed at you. There has been at least one person that told him to kill himself already and well we all know about Jet.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
User: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2012-01-16 03:20:10
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

hatred is acceptable at times.

I hate slavery, genocide, murder, rape, pillaging etc.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:20:45
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Mabrook said: »
Homosexuality is by extension love for your fellow man.

Also, who do you think is a better person: a homosexual that raises another person's child, or the person who created the child?

That statement is impossible to answer. You have given me nothing to use to make a determination.

Unless you are saying who is a better person a homosexual that raises another person's child or a person who gives birth to and raises their own child.

In that case, still neither, because you could have substituted a straight couple who adopted in place of the homosexual. Homosexuality really means nothing in that example.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:21:34
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
You have to give me a few minutes, I'm still taking in that last statement.

I don't understand what is so difficult to take in about disagreeing with homosexuality but not hating homosexuals.

I believe it is against nature, science is actually in my favor on that one. I also cannot understand how a man can be attracted to another man that way and I can openly admit that I never will and shouldn't bother trying, since I will never be attracted to another man. The greatest fallacy here is a heterosexual expecting a homosexual to understand something they cannot, and vice versa.

Outside of homosexuality, they all have feelings, goals, ambitions, desires. They work jobs and pay taxes. They generally are nice people. Why do I have to hate the person, because I disagree with an act that I am not even taking part in anyway?
The problem is you condemn homosexuality and yet condone homosexuals in the same breath.

I don't condemn. Show me where I condemn. Show me where I said they were guaranteed a trip to hell for this. Since you cannot, I will point to you where I blatantly said that I believe homosexuals have a chance at forgiveness.

By saying saying that homosexuals must be forgiven of their sin of homosexuality in order to be considered for heaven.

That translate to homosexuality is a sin.

Right, you did say that god forbids it right?

I'll ask you again, Is homosexuality a sin?

Yes, homosexuality is a sin.

However, you make it sound like homosexuals are given a raw deal in having to be forgiven for the sin of homosexuality.

I have to be forgiven for the sin of premarital sex. I have to be forgiven for the sin of having a child out of wedlock.

God forbids all that too and just like a homosexual, I have the possibility of being forgiven.

You make it sound like homosexuality is the only thing God calls a sin and that they are specifically being singled out with the word sin. They are not.

Outside of blasphemy, all sins can be forgiven, all sins are on the same level. We are all sinners, no matter what Westboro may believe.
If you recall in the beginning we are starting with one law at a time, remember?

Saying homosexuality is a sin, is in fact condemning it.

Uh, false. Sin can be forgiven.
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:22:17
Link | Citer | R
 
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
You are part of the problem. You call religion fake and imaginary and yet, you cannot, under your own empirical standards of evidence, possibly disprove God.

This is your fallacy, you don't admit to the possibility of being wrong. I could be wrong. I don't think I am, but there is always the possibility of me being wrong.

Until then, you should go away and think about what it would take for you to empirically prove me wrong.

Someone doesn't understand how claims work! The claim is that God exists: the ball is in your court to prove he does exist before someone can reassess data to say "Nope, wrong."

You can't disprove Russel's Teapot, The Invisible Pink Unicorn, The Flying Spaghetti Monster, or The Dragon in my Garage. You can't disprove Garden Gnomes, you can't disprove Shoe Faeries, you can't disprove Nessie, you can't disprove Godzilla. What's your point?

In the absence of evidence, why the *** should we have any ounce of faith in something?

I admit the possibility of being wrong, but so long as there's no proof for any of that ***, the only logical stance is "Nope, no Gnomes. No God. No Unicorns."

No one is saying you have to have faith. That's your choice. But the lack of evidence isn't proof that something doesn't exist or didn't happen.

If there's no evidence, there's no reason to believe it. Why should we?

That's a question each person has to ask themselves. YMMV.
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Serveur: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
User: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2012-01-16 03:22:46
Link | Citer | R
 
Copout.

Why should we believe in Garden Gnomes?
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-16 03:22:48
Link | Citer | R
 
Some of these arguments remind me of arguments I've had with a g/f. It's like nitpicking at every little thing that you can find. You prove it. no you disprove it. I don't have to disprove if you can't prove. Not rational! you're mom! ignorant son of a ***. You were looking at her *** weren't you. I was looking at her breasts damnit!
 Fenrir.Jinjo
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
User: Minjo
Posts: 2269
By Fenrir.Jinjo 2012-01-16 03:22:49
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
That statement is impossible to answer. You have given me nothing to use to make a determination.

Unless you are saying who is a better person a homosexual that raises another person's child or a person who gives birth to and raises their own child.

In that case, still neither, because you could have substituted a straight couple who adopted in place of the homosexual. Homosexuality really means nothing in that example.

Actually, it does, and your refusal to acknowledge the implications of sexuality outside of sexual behavior and desires does not make them go away. It's also the crucial reason your "sin not the sinner" argument is so horridly flawed.
 Bismarck.Rharmony
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Rharmon
Posts: 589
By Bismarck.Rharmony 2012-01-16 03:23:44
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
You were looking at her *** weren't you. I was looking at her breasts damnit!

Always looking at the ***.
But then, so is my girl. <3
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
User: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2012-01-16 03:24:09
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

If I hated him, I would not be preaching.

More than anything, I feel full of sorrow. I am full of sadness for Evandis.

And above that a notch, I have forgiveness.

I'm kind of like the Tenth Doctor.
Wasn't really directed at you. There has been at least one person that told him to kill himself already and well we all know about Jet.

what about me?

you have yet to answer me earlier as to what "problem"

you are painting me as a bigot and I am nothing of the sort.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2012-01-16 03:24:26
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
You have to give me a few minutes, I'm still taking in that last statement.

I don't understand what is so difficult to take in about disagreeing with homosexuality but not hating homosexuals.

I believe it is against nature, science is actually in my favor on that one. I also cannot understand how a man can be attracted to another man that way and I can openly admit that I never will and shouldn't bother trying, since I will never be attracted to another man. The greatest fallacy here is a heterosexual expecting a homosexual to understand something they cannot, and vice versa.

Outside of homosexuality, they all have feelings, goals, ambitions, desires. They work jobs and pay taxes. They generally are nice people. Why do I have to hate the person, because I disagree with an act that I am not even taking part in anyway?
The problem is you condemn homosexuality and yet condone homosexuals in the same breath.

I don't condemn. Show me where I condemn. Show me where I said they were guaranteed a trip to hell for this. Since you cannot, I will point to you where I blatantly said that I believe homosexuals have a chance at forgiveness.

By saying saying that homosexuals must be forgiven of their sin of homosexuality in order to be considered for heaven.

That translate to homosexuality is a sin.

Right, you did say that god forbids it right?

I'll ask you again, Is homosexuality a sin?

Yes, homosexuality is a sin.

However, you make it sound like homosexuals are given a raw deal in having to be forgiven for the sin of homosexuality.

I have to be forgiven for the sin of premarital sex. I have to be forgiven for the sin of having a child out of wedlock.

God forbids all that too and just like a homosexual, I have the possibility of being forgiven.

You make it sound like homosexuality is the only thing God calls a sin and that they are specifically being singled out with the word sin. They are not.

Outside of blasphemy, all sins can be forgiven, all sins are on the same level. We are all sinners, no matter what Westboro may believe.
If you recall in the beginning we are starting with one law at a time, remember?

Saying homosexuality is a sin, is in fact condemning it.

Uh, false. Sin can be forgiven.
Ok I see where the problem is.

Labeling something as a sin, is not condemning it?

If so then why would it need to be forgiven in the first place?
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-16 03:24:30
Link | Citer | R
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

hatred is acceptable at times.

I hate slavery, genocide, murder, rape, pillaging etc.
Let me guess... you're going to apply that to religion and then say that's why you hate it!
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:25:18
Link | Citer | R
 
Powerslave said: »
As much as I disagree with pretty much everything Evandis said and I kind of truthfully think he's a douche, I think you guys are taking it a bit far on the homosexuality thing.

If he considers it a sin, leave him be. He's not spewing hatred or nonsense about how he wants to save their confused soul from hell. Yes his view is a bit bigoted in my opinion, but believe it or not his opinion is one a lot of people have, but that does not necessarily stop them from being friends with someone who is gay or actually hate and discriminate against them.

How am I a bigot. I am not intolerant to homosexuals. I wish no ill will on them, I do not try to prevent them from living their lives as they wish. I do not go around calling them mean slurs. Someone is not a bigot because they disagree with homosexuality. Someone is a bigot when they maliciously and purposefully attempt to harm a person who engages in this activity.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2012-01-16 03:25:39
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Bismarck.Cordareo
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Cordareo
Posts: 149
By Bismarck.Cordareo 2012-01-16 03:26:50
Link | Citer | R
 
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Uh, false. Sin can be forgiven.
[+]
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
User: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2012-01-16 03:28:05
Link | Citer | R
 
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

hatred is acceptable at times.

I hate slavery, genocide, murder, rape, pillaging etc.
Let me guess... you're going to apply that to religion and then say that's why you hate it!

no I've already explained my disgust for religion and it's what allows it, I don't generalize it based on it's products, I reserve the disgusts for each religion to each religion.

(hint: it's the thing that allows religion to propagate)
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
Serveur: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
User: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2012-01-16 03:28:35
Link | Citer | R
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
It amazes me that some of you preach against hatred yet dole it out yourself too.

If I hated him, I would not be preaching.

More than anything, I feel full of sorrow. I am full of sadness for Evandis.

And above that a notch, I have forgiveness.

I'm kind of like the Tenth Doctor.
Wasn't really directed at you. There has been at least one person that told him to kill himself already and well we all know about Jet.

what about me?

you have yet to answer me earlier as to what "problem"

you are painting me as a bigot and I am nothing of the sort.
For one you mentioned God as being a ***. You fan the flames Jet. Like most conversations on the boards you come in armed with your opinions, labeling them as fact and pretty much pissing someone off every time. You speak down to and generally hate on a group of people for their beliefs. I mean I don't know what else that is.

Edit: I also don't get where your sense of superiority comes from.
[+]
 Bismarck.Rharmony
Offline
Serveur: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
User: Rharmon
Posts: 589
By Bismarck.Rharmony 2012-01-16 03:29:19
Link | Citer | R
 
Hate breeds Hate.
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
User: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2012-01-16 03:29:20
Link | Citer | R
 
I need a drink.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Evandis
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
User: Evandis
Posts: 463
By Ragnarok.Evandis 2012-01-16 03:29:30
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Ragnarok.Evandis said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
You have to give me a few minutes, I'm still taking in that last statement.

I don't understand what is so difficult to take in about disagreeing with homosexuality but not hating homosexuals.

I believe it is against nature, science is actually in my favor on that one. I also cannot understand how a man can be attracted to another man that way and I can openly admit that I never will and shouldn't bother trying, since I will never be attracted to another man. The greatest fallacy here is a heterosexual expecting a homosexual to understand something they cannot, and vice versa.

Outside of homosexuality, they all have feelings, goals, ambitions, desires. They work jobs and pay taxes. They generally are nice people. Why do I have to hate the person, because I disagree with an act that I am not even taking part in anyway?
The problem is you condemn homosexuality and yet condone homosexuals in the same breath.

I don't condemn. Show me where I condemn. Show me where I said they were guaranteed a trip to hell for this. Since you cannot, I will point to you where I blatantly said that I believe homosexuals have a chance at forgiveness.

By saying saying that homosexuals must be forgiven of their sin of homosexuality in order to be considered for heaven.

That translate to homosexuality is a sin.

Right, you did say that god forbids it right?

I'll ask you again, Is homosexuality a sin?

Yes, homosexuality is a sin.

However, you make it sound like homosexuals are given a raw deal in having to be forgiven for the sin of homosexuality.

I have to be forgiven for the sin of premarital sex. I have to be forgiven for the sin of having a child out of wedlock.

God forbids all that too and just like a homosexual, I have the possibility of being forgiven.

You make it sound like homosexuality is the only thing God calls a sin and that they are specifically being singled out with the word sin. They are not.

Outside of blasphemy, all sins can be forgiven, all sins are on the same level. We are all sinners, no matter what Westboro may believe.
If you recall in the beginning we are starting with one law at a time, remember?

Saying homosexuality is a sin, is in fact condemning it.

Uh, false. Sin can be forgiven.
Ok I see where the problem is.

Labeling something as a sin, is not condemning it?

If so then why would it need to be forgiven in the first place?

I feel like you are just mincing words here.

Either which way, the point you are going around, is I have not stated, nor do I believe that homosexuality is unforgivable and automatically eliminates all hope that a person can enter Heaven. For all I know, I won't enter because of my sins, numerous as some may be, could be viewed by God as more egregious.

God forbids it, that's why you have to apologize to him. If you choose not to believe in God, then you shouldn't be worried about it. It's almost like you would rather all religious people walk around and tell you that you are going to burn in hell, because it would make you feel right 100% of the time.
First Page 2 3 ... 11 12 13 ... 23 24 25
Log in to post.