Atheists The New Theists ?

Semantics.

my whole point is it hasn't been preoven.

Since you can't even spell my name right and think it's ok for you to attack my faith and I can't even bring Evolution into the picture because you're too close minded I'll just leave my response to a picture.

You guys should have your own sitcom. For realz.

If you can disprove Evolution and the multitude of theory's that it is based upon. Why are you arguing and not collecting your Nobel Prize?

Aw, the poor mentally disabled kids just cried because you used the R-word!

I wanna see Atomic Theory attacked next. Cause I can't see the little ***!

okay, do you know what a theory is?

can you read?



So since theories are made in a way consistent with the scientific method.
Again, where does scientific method become/require faith?
You've been redundant the whole damn time, if you want to be a baby about it by all means.

so since theory comes from scientific method you essentially are saying a theory requires faith which in turn means the scientific method in question had faith enter the equation at some point.
where does this happen?

edit:
since you apparently don't know what I mean by "where did it occur?"
I will further illustrate.
at what point while formulating said theory did it turn to faith?
if you can't make a defined remark in regards to that you don't know enough about the big bang, or any science thing that you are trying to argue.

According to whose point of view? Is there some absolute record of knowledge and truth that I'm unaware of?

Even if you "win" an argument, it doesn't mean you're actually right or even that the scholars you cite really have their facts straight, or that you or your opponent has exhausted all possible evidence.
I didn't say to let people be wrong. I said, "stop being so f-ing critical" and to "temper our criticism."
The strength of reason is subjective. If the guy with the camera has a cute smile, that's reason enough for some. Either way, I was trying to encourage the thought that people often have faith with "good" reason, according to their own perspective.
I have mixed feelings on this.

Because everyone that tries gets dis-credited for thinking outside the box. I don't need to disprove it to you. This thread is proof that you're not willing to think outside of your box. Sure, I'm not either but I have read as much of the claims about Evolution/Atheism/etc as I have the patience to.

Oh and Yes I do understand what a Theory is. Thank you. So can you say that my problem is with people who take a group of theories and make connections between them to answer things people have trouble answering? (ie- Where did all of this come from? Where did the Cosmic dust come from?) If you think since Human's are flawed, the Bible is also flawed then are not Theories flawed also?

I think we're just treading water here. Had I realied Inuyushi was a creationist a few pages back, I would have just used crayons.

Logic and reason wont work on him. The guy believes in magic. He believes evolution is a lie, the big bang was a hoax, and all of science is a ploy by the devil.

You can't debate with that kind if individual.

The guy doesn't even know what cosmic dust is. He doesn't even know what macro evolution is. He's just using buzz words at this point and he doesn't even realize how stupid it makes him look.

Still can't answer the question?
I can say your problem is dodging legitimate questions while making further opinion driven inferences about the world around you.
one thing at a time my dear.
I can get into what you mentioned as well but that's a whole different category past what we were originally talking on and I'm not letting you get off of the path so easily.

No matter how much you think outside the box, if you cannot prove or test it against the accepted / tested / highly validated theory. Then yes you might have a bit of a problem.

Yes, you do need to disprove it to me to usurp the mountain of supportive evidence that have been build upon for the past 100 years.

Not getting off the path? You're refusing to move forward. Yes, I am a Creationist and you just proved my point. Evolutionists are just as stuborn as Creationists.

Anyway, obviously you two are done with me so I'll stop too. Go ahead and take the last word to make yourselves look good.

No you can.
You just have to know how to talk to people.
I.E. not being a *** and giving off holier than thou vibes.
remove the insults and bickering and conductive debate can occur from your side and that's the only side that's really needed to worry about.
people aren't static, they are dynamic.
Whatever, if you can't back up what you say and just spout things you won't get a real discussion, that's debate 101.
I've been nothing but kind to you and given you the chance to illustrate what you wanted to say but since you can't or won't there we really can't go much past that.
the foundation of your argument is that theories require faith, since you can't elaborate about what theory has faith and where that faith happens and what-not you obviously either aren't a great linguist or you don't know much about the subject.
but if you don't know much about the subject..i wouldn't recommend using it as your default point of argument.

Exactly.

There is more evidence for evolution than there is for the world being round.

In fact, if Inuyushi knew -anything- about what he was talking about, he would realize that evolution is one of the most studied/evidence backed theories -in existence-.

I'm waiting for his "it's just a theory" comment though. Please let him be as predictable as he is ignorant.

I'm bored now.

Edit: Double post lag fts

Everyone's going to end with this? lol, and Religious people are known as extreme you say.

ftfy
bold is from the original, italic for the fixed portion

Why, yes, of course religious people are extreme. You notice in the comic that if the man weren't religious or a creationist that he'd just get the most appropriate medicine.

Its poking fun at the fact that creationists ignore evolution right under (and sometimes in and around) their noses. Bacteria and viruses evolving is a form, duh, of evolution. If you don't believe in evolution at all... you get the joke, right?

Having to explain jokes... gah.... horrible.

LOL!!! LOVE IT!

But like, the eye is like complex man, and couldn't have evolved naturally man.

Going with the word creationist and not intelligent design. At least intelligent design sounds scientific, creationist just makes you sound mentally deficient.

Do you have proof on the big bang?

Simple internet search:
Proof of Big Bang Seen by Space Probe, Scientists Say

It's not exactly infallible.

Why can't people believe in both?

That doesn't really work if you point it out man! lol...