EDIT: crap I paged >_<
Pics That Make You LOL
Pics that make you LOL
Physics lesson in 3....2....
[+]
This book needs more pictures--I've already run out of things to color. :C
$5 on Amazon! Order yours now!
Edit: I dropped the pages with "rhetoric" on them. Apologies for the rustled jimmies. And to clarify: it's not so much about the message itself as about the fact that it's a coloring book with nothing but the same face next to a large wall of text on every page. You could replace his face with that of any other prominent politician and it would still be absurdly funny.
$5 on Amazon! Order yours now!
Edit: I dropped the pages with "rhetoric" on them. Apologies for the rustled jimmies. And to clarify: it's not so much about the message itself as about the fact that it's a coloring book with nothing but the same face next to a large wall of text on every page. You could replace his face with that of any other prominent politician and it would still be absurdly funny.
[+]
I didn't find many lols today.
[+]
Carrelo, Get that crap off the LOLpics please
[+]
[+]
Quetzalcoatl.Moonsshadow said: »
Looks like we have a new character for the comic
from http://imgur.com/user/kantackistan
[+]
Bahamut.Nixak said: »
I'm no grammar police, but that comic was less funny because of its phrasing. It would be "to granted" if the context was location ("where"). Else, her question would have to be "what are you taking me?".
Sorry. Haha.
/rant
[+]
Bahamut.Oakozric said: »
I'm no grammar police, but that comic was less funny because of its phrasing. It would be "to granted" if the context was location ("where"). Else, her question would have to be "what are you taking me?".
I thought the same thing, but it could be like:
"Where are we going?"
"For cake and ice cream!"
Oh well :P
Only one picture to quickly fulfill my obligation to post things when posting in the "lol thread"!
Kin Zoku said: »
Bahamut.Oakozric said: »
I'm no grammar police, but that comic was less funny because of its phrasing. It would be "to granted" if the context was location ("where"). Else, her question would have to be "what are you taking me?".
I thought the same thing, but it could be like:
"Where are we going?"
"For cake and ice cream!"
Oh well :P
If instead of "Where are you taking me" (as with the comic), the question was as you re-phrased it, "Where are we going?" ('Taking' vs 'Going' and 'you' vs 'we' have changed ), you could respond with "For Granted" and maintain some sentence structure; but, it wouldn't make any sense. How do you "go" for 'granted'? Again, sorry I've wasted another post on this - haha. What a Debbie-downer I am.
Bahamut.Oakozric said: »
Kin Zoku said: »
Bahamut.Oakozric said: »
I'm no grammar police, but that comic was less funny because of its phrasing. It would be "to granted" if the context was location ("where"). Else, her question would have to be "what are you taking me?".
I thought the same thing, but it could be like:
"Where are we going?"
"For cake and ice cream!"
Oh well :P
If instead of "Where are you taking me" (as with the comic), the question was as you re-phrased it, "Where are we going?" ('Taking' vs 'Going' and 'you' vs 'we' have changed ), you could respond with "For Granted" and maintain some sentence structure; but, it wouldn't make any sense. How do you "go" for 'granted'? Again, sorry I've wasted another post on this - haha. What a Debbie-downer I am.
I think the point of it was that in a relationship, you never listen to your partner? Hell, Idk.
[+]
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.