Final Fantasy VII
Final Fantasy VII
I was gonna say that but definitely not in those words, lol
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
I think the *** should focus less on remakes and focus more on the other damn games that they haven't come out with(Final Fantasy Versus XIII), because If 13-2 comes out before Versus some heads are gonna roll.
meh, none of their new games have kept me interested, so at the moment anything SE does is dissapoint
13 was okay, but when I saw the trailers for both Versus looked better IMO.
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Ramuh.Laffter said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
A lot of people, especially in the gaming community (like this site) seem to consider FF7 way overrated and rant and rave about how FF8 or 9 or 6 or wtf ever was the best FF of all time.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
I'm one of "those" types. FF7 was my outro to the series. I didn't get a PS1 until long after PS2 had already been out, and I just wasn't a fan of the blocky polygons in 7. FF6 was my last hurrah before coming to FFXI.
That being said, a remake of 7 would be pretty neat, I'd definitely get it. My wife is a huge fan of 7, so I know she'd be all about it too.
That was honestly my biggest complaint. I was a much bigger fan of the 2-d sprite FF titles. That, combined with not owning a PS1 to even play the game and all. All my friends had it, and were always playing it when I would go hang out with them, so I've literally sat through the entire story of the game without ever picking up a controller. That's not a bad thing, necessarily.
that's like saying you enjoyed sex when all you do is watch your friends have it, it's just not the same there guy.
Not really. I wasn't a big fan of the modernized-futuristic setting, all my FF games were set in medieval fantasy setting, except for 6, which was more of a hybrid. That being said, I didn't mind the story.
Ramuh.Laffter said:
I was gonna say that but definitely not in those words, lol
well for video game nerds, I felt it was mildly fitting, although I probably could have done better, oh well.
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Ramuh.Laffter said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
A lot of people, especially in the gaming community (like this site) seem to consider FF7 way overrated and rant and rave about how FF8 or 9 or 6 or wtf ever was the best FF of all time.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
I'm one of "those" types. FF7 was my outro to the series. I didn't get a PS1 until long after PS2 had already been out, and I just wasn't a fan of the blocky polygons in 7. FF6 was my last hurrah before coming to FFXI.
That being said, a remake of 7 would be pretty neat, I'd definitely get it. My wife is a huge fan of 7, so I know she'd be all about it too.
That was honestly my biggest complaint. I was a much bigger fan of the 2-d sprite FF titles. That, combined with not owning a PS1 to even play the game and all. All my friends had it, and were always playing it when I would go hang out with them, so I've literally sat through the entire story of the game without ever picking up a controller. That's not a bad thing, necessarily.
that's like saying you enjoyed sex when all you do is watch your friends have it, it's just not the same there guy.
Not really. I wasn't a big fan of the modernized-futuristic setting, all my FF games were set in medieval fantasy setting, except for 6, which was more of a hybrid. That being said, I didn't mind the story.
considering half the game is small towns and the rest is field work that doesn't even make sense.
actually no, it still doesn't make sense
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
I think the *** should focus less on remakes and focus more on the other damn games that they haven't come out with(Final Fantasy Versus XIII), because If 13-2 comes out before Versus some heads are gonna roll.
meh, none of their new games have kept me interested, so at the moment anything SE does is dissapoint
13 was okay, but when I saw the trailers for both Versus looked better IMO.
I have 13 and 12 and haven't really played either, guess I just don't have the time I used to.
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
I think the *** should focus less on remakes and focus more on the other damn games that they haven't come out with(Final Fantasy Versus XIII), because If 13-2 comes out before Versus some heads are gonna roll.
meh, none of their new games have kept me interested, so at the moment anything SE does is dissapoint
13 was okay, but when I saw the trailers for both Versus looked better IMO.
I have 13 and 12 and haven't really played either, guess I just don't have the time I used to.
Haven't touched 13 since last year lol.
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
12 was fun for me. It did get to a point where all I was doing was running into fights and letting gambits do the work for me.
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Ramuh.Laffter said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
A lot of people, especially in the gaming community (like this site) seem to consider FF7 way overrated and rant and rave about how FF8 or 9 or 6 or wtf ever was the best FF of all time.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
I'm one of "those" types. FF7 was my outro to the series. I didn't get a PS1 until long after PS2 had already been out, and I just wasn't a fan of the blocky polygons in 7. FF6 was my last hurrah before coming to FFXI.
That being said, a remake of 7 would be pretty neat, I'd definitely get it. My wife is a huge fan of 7, so I know she'd be all about it too.
That was honestly my biggest complaint. I was a much bigger fan of the 2-d sprite FF titles. That, combined with not owning a PS1 to even play the game and all. All my friends had it, and were always playing it when I would go hang out with them, so I've literally sat through the entire story of the game without ever picking up a controller. That's not a bad thing, necessarily.
that's like saying you enjoyed sex when all you do is watch your friends have it, it's just not the same there guy.
Not really. I wasn't a big fan of the modernized-futuristic setting, all my FF games were set in medieval fantasy setting, except for 6, which was more of a hybrid. That being said, I didn't mind the story.
considering half the game is small towns and the rest is field work that doesn't even make sense.
actually no, it still doesn't make sense
Any other opinions I'm supposed to have make sense? I thought it looked like ***. I wasn't interested enough to get a PS1 and buy it. After the subsequent years of fanboys and girls squeeing about Cloud and Sephiroth, I'm too burned out on it to give 2 shits. Does that make any more sense?
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
Nope, not by a looong shot.
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
Most FF games are a bit of a hybrid, even 11. I really like that about them, how half the people in the world of that game are living in the 16th century, and the other half are living in an almost futuristic world. Some of the older games do this the best I think, in that you think you're in a medieval world, then Cid rocks up with his *** airship, and next thing you know you're being attacked by giant robots in a hidden mechanical city.
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
The first Final Fantasy was "Final Fantasy" ...
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
spin-offs go THATAWAY.
Hell it was even released as Mystic Quest in the UK.
Odin.Blazza said:
Most FF games are a bit of a hybrid, even 11. I really like that about them, how half the people in the world of that game are living in the 16th century, and the other half are living in an almost futuristic world. Some of the older games do this the best I think, in that you think you're in a medieval world, then Cid rocks up with his *** airship, and next thing you know you're being attacked by giant robots in a hidden mechanical city.
That much has always been there. Yes, in the first FF game on NES, there is a part where you do fight machines in a futuristc level. But that's one small part of an otherwise 90% medieval fantasy game. That much I did like.
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Ramuh.Laffter said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
A lot of people, especially in the gaming community (like this site) seem to consider FF7 way overrated and rant and rave about how FF8 or 9 or 6 or wtf ever was the best FF of all time.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
Personally, like many others, FF7 was my introduction to the series and therefor holds a very special place for me. Even without that connection though, I'm perfectly happy to say that it's one of my all-time favourite games.
Long story short, would I buy a remake? *** yes.
I'm one of "those" types. FF7 was my outro to the series. I didn't get a PS1 until long after PS2 had already been out, and I just wasn't a fan of the blocky polygons in 7. FF6 was my last hurrah before coming to FFXI.
That being said, a remake of 7 would be pretty neat, I'd definitely get it. My wife is a huge fan of 7, so I know she'd be all about it too.
That was honestly my biggest complaint. I was a much bigger fan of the 2-d sprite FF titles. That, combined with not owning a PS1 to even play the game and all. All my friends had it, and were always playing it when I would go hang out with them, so I've literally sat through the entire story of the game without ever picking up a controller. That's not a bad thing, necessarily.
that's like saying you enjoyed sex when all you do is watch your friends have it, it's just not the same there guy.
Not really. I wasn't a big fan of the modernized-futuristic setting, all my FF games were set in medieval fantasy setting, except for 6, which was more of a hybrid. That being said, I didn't mind the story.
considering half the game is small towns and the rest is field work that doesn't even make sense.
actually no, it still doesn't make sense
Any other opinions I'm supposed to have make sense? I thought it looked like ***. I wasn't interested enough to get a PS1 and buy it. After the subsequent years of fanboys and girls squeeing about Cloud and Sephiroth, I'm too burned out on it to give 2 shits. Does that make any more sense?
it still doesn't make sense, sorry.
Odin.Blazza said:
Most FF games are a bit of a hybrid, even 11. I really like that about them, how half the people in the world of that game are living in the 16th century, and the other half are living in an almost futuristic world. Some of the older games do this the best I think, in that you think you're in a medieval world, then Cid rocks up with his *** airship, and next thing you know you're being attacked by giant robots in a hidden mechanical city.
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Any other opinions I'm supposed to have make sense? I thought it looked like ***. I wasn't interested enough to get a PS1 and buy it. After the subsequent years of fanboys and girls squeeing about Cloud and Sephiroth, I'm too burned out on it to give 2 shits. Does that make any more sense?
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
Most FF games are a bit of a hybrid, even 11. I really like that about them, how half the people in the world of that game are living in the 16th century, and the other half are living in an almost futuristic world. Some of the older games do this the best I think, in that you think you're in a medieval world, then Cid rocks up with his *** airship, and next thing you know you're being attacked by giant robots in a hidden mechanical city.
That much has always been there. Yes, in the first FF game on NES, there is a part where you do fight machines in a futuristc level. But that's one small part of an otherwise 90% medieval fantasy game. That much I did like.
so 70% compared to 90% is what makes the difference for you?
Odin.Blazza said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Any other opinions I'm supposed to have make sense? I thought it looked like ***. I wasn't interested enough to get a PS1 and buy it. After the subsequent years of fanboys and girls squeeing about Cloud and Sephiroth, I'm too burned out on it to give 2 shits. Does that make any more sense?
yes
Didn't have a PS2 either. I had a lolN64. I picked the wrong horse in that race...
PS1?
PSX is far superior.
PSX is far superior.
[+]
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Rayik said:
Odin.Blazza said:
Most FF games are a bit of a hybrid, even 11. I really like that about them, how half the people in the world of that game are living in the 16th century, and the other half are living in an almost futuristic world. Some of the older games do this the best I think, in that you think you're in a medieval world, then Cid rocks up with his *** airship, and next thing you know you're being attacked by giant robots in a hidden mechanical city.
That much has always been there. Yes, in the first FF game on NES, there is a part where you do fight machines in a futuristc level. But that's one small part of an otherwise 90% medieval fantasy game. That much I did like.
so 70% compared to 90% is what makes the difference for you?
Dude, get off my nuts. Are you a paid representative of SE's FF7 development team? Christ on a cracker I didn't care for it so I didn't get it.
Ramuh.Rowland said:
Ramuh.Laffter said:
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
Johnny
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
The first Final Fantasy was "Final Fantasy" ...
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
The first Final Fantasy was "Final Fantasy" ...
First one came out in 87(90 for the US) for JP, Adventures came out in 91 on the Gameboy.
Huuuuuge difference.
Also, from what you're saying Rayik, (and this is the last I'll say because it's suddenly turning into a "pick on Rayik because he doesn't like FF7" thread) is that you haven't actually played the game at all, but are judging it based only on it's reviews, which are all great really. Even the people that spurn it for the pure fact that it's "over-rated" generally express a certain amount of respect for it.
Seriously, give it a try, it's a great story, and a way more in-depth game with more side-quests and other ***to do than any of the single player FF's that came after it. (imo)
Seriously, give it a try, it's a great story, and a way more in-depth game with more side-quests and other ***to do than any of the single player FF's that came after it. (imo)
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Asura.Yunalaysca said:
wasnt like the very first final fantasy (FFadventures) like a very modernized-futuristic game? had a *** jet bike for christ sakes.
The first Final Fantasy was "Final Fantasy" ...
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.