Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking? |
||
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Oh, not pedophilia when they're the same age
I had to have a permission slip to watch a movie or two in my sex ed class, hell, I even had to get permission to TAKE the class itself, even though it was mandatory to graduate! Seriously?
I had to get a permission slip signed to watch a genocide movie in my Geography class my senior year, my senior year... And I think I had to get a few extra permission slips signed throughout high school on a few things. Bismarck.Magnuss said: » As for swearing, no one knows where the word "***" even comes from, although there is speculation of its origins. And even then, the origin is so dated and underwhelming, it makes you wonder why that word is so sinister to begin with. Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Well, it boils down to the puritanical way we raise children over here. We spend the first 6 months or so breastfeeding children, then immediately shun them away from it, as if they suddenly become perverse. As if their function hasn't remained the same since using them the first time. As for swearing, no one knows where the word "***" even comes from, although there is speculation of its origins. And even then, the origin is so dated and underwhelming, it makes you wonder why that word is so sinister to begin with. To me, there should be swear words, but I think "***" shouldn't be one of them. Neither should "***". I think the ones that should really be swear words are the ones whose sole job is to demean or demoralize another person by representing years of hate and derision. The "N" word is one. The "F" word is another (y'know, the one that means "cigarette" in England). Those words are horrid and should be stricken from the language. But "***"? Who the hell is that hurting? Though our language does love to lower words with Germanic origins (assuming it at least came in some part from Germanic). Now if there was a Latin equivalent of "***," that'd have class! Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Oh, not pedophilia when they're the same age Romeo = 19 From googling a bit it seems like Juliet was 13 ('not quite fourteen') and Romeo's age wasn't mentioned? But I also saw that he didn't have a beard so he doesn't seem much older than her then
Terraka said: » I had to have a permission slip to watch a movie or two in my sex ed class, hell, I even had to get permission to TAKE the class itself, even though it was mandatory to graduate! Seriously? I had to get a permission slip signed to watch a genocide movie in my Geography class my senior year, my senior year... And I think I had to get a few extra permission slips signed throughout high school on a few things. Your schools are weird Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Oh, not pedophilia when they're the same age Sure is was acceptable back when Shakespeare wrote it but when you start remaking it into horrible movies and forcing young people to watch Decaprio prancing around with guns. That ***is wrong. Offline
Posts: 2877
Anna Ruthven said: » Bismarck.Magnuss said: » As for swearing, no one knows where the word "***" even comes from, although there is speculation of its origins. And even then, the origin is so dated and underwhelming, it makes you wonder why that word is so sinister to begin with. I had a good chuckle when I discovered that theory is actually a joke. Asura.Ackeronll said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Oh, not pedophilia when they're the same age Sure is was acceptable back when Shakespeare wrote it but when you start remaking it into horrible movies and forcing young people to watch Decaprio prancing around with guns. That ***is wrong. Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age.
Bismarck.Patrik said: » Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Well, it boils down to the puritanical way we raise children over here. We spend the first 6 months or so breastfeeding children, then immediately shun them away from it, as if they suddenly become perverse. As if their function hasn't remained the same since using them the first time. As for swearing, no one knows where the word "***" even comes from, although there is speculation of its origins. And even then, the origin is so dated and underwhelming, it makes you wonder why that word is so sinister to begin with. To me, there should be swear words, but I think "***" shouldn't be one of them. Neither should "***". I think the ones that should really be swear words are the ones whose sole job is to demean or demoralize another person by representing years of hate and derision. The "N" word is one. The "F" word is another (y'know, the one that means "cigarette" in England). Those words are horrid and should be stricken from the language. But "***"? Who the hell is that hurting? Though our language does love to lower words with Germanic origins (assuming it at least came in some part from Germanic). Now if there was a Latin equivalent of "***," that'd have class! Offline
Posts: 2877
Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." Didn't the Romans and Greeks do that too? lol
There are still some places in the US where you can get married that early.
We call it Alabama. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Didn't the Romans and Greeks do that too? lol Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." You can get married at any age in the US as long as you have parental permission lol. I'm sure that's not the only "taboo" thing legal in Alabama lol
Anna Ruthven said: » Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." Quote: In Yorkshire in the 14th and 15th centuries, the age range for most brides was between 18 and 22 years and the age of the grooms was similar; rural Yorkshire women tended to marry in their late teens to early twenties while their urban counterparts married in their early to middle twenties. In the 15th century, the average Italian bride was 18 and married a groom 10–12 years her senior. An unmarried Tuscan woman 21 years of age would be seen as past marriageable age, the benchmark for which was 19 years, and easily 97 percent of Florentine women were married by the age of 25 years while 21 years was the typical age of a contemporary English bride. Anna Ruthven said: » Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." But still, nonetheless, they were married off that young for many different reasons, nobility or peasantry. Either to combine houses, create alliances, for fortune and even for land and livestock. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." Quote: In Yorkshire in the 14th and 15th centuries, the age range for most brides was between 18 and 22 years and the age of the grooms was similar; rural Yorkshire women tended to marry in their late teens to early twenties while their urban counterparts married in their early to middle twenties. In the 15th century, the average Italian bride was 18 and married a groom 10–12 years her senior. An unmarried Tuscan woman 21 years of age would be seen as past marriageable age, the benchmark for which was 19 years, and easily 97 percent of Florentine women were married by the age of 25 years while 21 years was the typical age of a contemporary English bride. Then I need to brush up on my history. xD lol Quote: Indeed, Medieval England saw marriage age as variable depending on economic circumstances, with couples delaying marriage until the early twenties when times were bad and the average age falling to the late teens after the Black Death, when there were labor shortages; by appearances, marriage of adolescents was not the norm in England. The sudden loss of people from the plague resulted in a glut of lucrative jobs for many people and more people could afford to marry young, lowering the age at marriage to the late teens and thus increasing fertility. From 1619 to 1660 in the archdiocese of Canterbury, England, the median age of the brides was 22 years and nine months while the median age for the grooms was 25 years and six months, with average ages of 24 years for the brides and nearly 28 years for the grooms, with the most common ages at marriage being 22 years for women and 24 years for men; interestingly, the Church dictated that the age when one could marry without the consent of one’s parents was 21 years. A large majority of English brides in this time were at least 19 years of age when they married, and only one bride in a thousand was thirteen years of age or younger. Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Terraka said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Not like marrying and having children at that age was normal back then anyway. Pretty sure most people got married around 18-25, even nobility and royalty married around that age. Actually, women back then were married off around 12, 13 or 14 years old to men twice their ages and started having kids as soon as they were married. If a women was still unmarried by 18 to 20 years old, they were considered an "Old Maid" or a "Spinster." ? Exactly. Paul Rudd.
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|