Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking? |
||
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Being a musician doesn't mean you can't be intelligent, have good enough culture for the job and the right ideas.
Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » The only reason record companies exist is to make money. If they all became non profit organizations solely based on making sure quality music got out, they wouldn't exist. Far more worthy causes to vilify than the music industry. edit: I'm basing this on the fact that non-profit entertainment companies exist. Fenrir.Weakness said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » I still play Avril lavigne's first two albums Ramy, were very enjoyable sounds. Her first album is sort of the crux of my argument, as it was largely not written by her, or at least quite guided by industry professionals. Very manufactured. She's since become a bit better in that regard. *shrug* Or you mean you prefer songwriters to singers? From the way I see it, he seems to have an issue with manufactured pop star for the sole purpose of making money. I'm a musician. Not a very good one. Not a professional one. But I'm friends with many from the entire spectrum of "giving music lessons on the side" to "performs professional with ensembles" to "tours the world for screaming audiences". I can appreciate the pop industry as a vessel to make money...for musicians. But musicians and artists getting used solely for the purpose of making money for others is infinitely frustrating to me. Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » I still play Avril lavigne's first two albums Ramy, were very enjoyable sounds. Her first album is sort of the crux of my argument, as it was largely not written by her, or at least quite guided by industry professionals. Very manufactured. She's since become a bit better in that regard. *shrug* Or you mean you prefer songwriters to singers? From the way I see it, he seems to have an issue with manufactured pop star for the sole purpose of making money. Other way around. She started manufactured pop-punk and got away from it to a more indie pop-rock image she desired. Actually, in that way, I kind of respect her. It's more that manufactured image and start I hold in low esteem. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » From the way I see it, he seems to have an issue with manufactured pop star for the sole purpose of making money. No, all signed music isn't manufactured. A lot of it is. But not all of it. Jetackuu said: » edit: I'm basing this on the fact that non-profit entertainment companies exist. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Jetackuu said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » The only reason record companies exist is to make money. If they all became non profit organizations solely based on making sure quality music got out, they wouldn't exist. Far more worthy causes to vilify than the music industry. edit: I'm basing this on the fact that non-profit entertainment companies exist. Honestly it's a true potential of the internet that is being inhibited and a lot of people ignore (or know too well) about it, that it makes the freedom of information near a true possibility, and that we could improve society as a whole by making a lot of things free, but that would hurt the pockets of a lot of very wealthy people, so they stifle it. (don't get me wrong, there's other persons that benefit too, but I don't want to get into a long debate about that) but the idea that the music industry is needed today is very half hazard at best. Hell dial up almost killed them. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » The only reason record companies exist is to make money. If they all became non profit organizations solely based on making sure quality music got out, they wouldn't exist. Far more worthy causes to vilify than the music industry. Paul McCartney, one of the most -- if not the most, in many ways -- celebrated human beings alive, has to pay royalties every time he plays some of the biggest songs he's ever written. The concept of intellectual property being owned by someone who didn't think it up (or their subsequent estate) is a plague upon creativity. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Read her wiki. By her own words she doesn't care for her first album as much. :p Asura.Kingnobody said: » Jetackuu said: » edit: I'm basing this on the fact that non-profit entertainment companies exist. I'd argue that things like popcorn time are examples, but I can see why they don't fit the traditional mold. I'll retract the statement for now, as I don't feel like doing further research. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » From the way I see it, he seems to have an issue with manufactured pop star for the sole purpose of making money. Eh, I see it in this light. If you're singing something that someone else wrote and scored, you're a performer not an artist. Doesn't mean it isn't a catchy tune or you can't enjoy it, but it was molded to sell. I just find that most of those types of songs just lack that something for me to connect to beyond "That sounded catchy" and then forget about it a month later. To toss in the cheese factor, those bands that put a little bit of their soul and emotion into what they are writing give you that something that was previously missing. It's their song, not their product to sell. It's why I feel that a lot of older music has been around so long, and why some bands make a bigger splash. It spans a long way in my head... Mozart, Wagner to The Beetles, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, even to more modern things I enjoy like Tool, Foo Fighters, Silversun Pickups, to more obscure like Little Hurricane, Ben Caplan, Melody Gardot. I dunno... it's hard to explain. Even when I don't know who the band is, or who wrote the song, or what flavor of music it is, I always end up finding ones that just click that something and I enjoy those and support those artists. It just happens the ones who hit whatever makes it click for me are the ones who aren't handed a script and told to act. That got longer than expected... music is just a big deal to me I guess. Probably why I spend so much money on headphones and speakers and ***. Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Like what you want. There's some misunderstanding here I think. I'm saying what I don't like. Not saying other people can't like it. All I'm saying in this regard is that I'm refuting what was said about her starting out Indie-whatever and then turning manufactured pop-punk, when in fact it was the other way around. You prefer the earlier. Sound. Good. Chances are more people do than will admit it. Even if you don't like a song you can admit when it's catchy. It's catchy for a reason. It's been researched for centuries to see what people gravitate toward. Funny story; Blues Traveler's one major commercially successful album has a song on it called "Hook" that makes fun of the listener right in the song, and most don't realize it. I know I didn't as a kid. And I absolutely adored the song/album. Still do to some extent. But you have to admit it's a pretty good out-in-the-open hidden joke. Please teach me what to like, master.
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Please teach me what to like, master. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Please teach me what to like, master. I'm oddly aroused now. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Please teach me what to like, master. meet me at the local mall in 30 minutes, bring lots of cash, and free up your Valefor.Sehachan said: » Please teach me what to like, master. Fenrir.Weakness said: » I'm oddly aroused now. Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Fenrir.Weakness said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Bismarck.Angelsfate said: » I still play Avril lavigne's first two albums Ramy, were very enjoyable sounds. Her first album is sort of the crux of my argument, as it was largely not written by her, or at least quite guided by industry professionals. Very manufactured. She's since become a bit better in that regard. *shrug* Or you mean you prefer songwriters to singers? From the way I see it, he seems to have an issue with manufactured pop star for the sole purpose of making money. Other way around. She started manufactured pop-punk and got away from it to a more indie pop-rock image she desired. Actually, in that way, I kind of respect her. It's more that manufactured image and start I hold in low esteem. avril lavigne is a hero. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Your worse nightmare! Odin.Jassik said: » Little bit of sub/dom is in everyone from my experience. Alas, from my understanding Seha is taken... otherwise I think we could of gotten along quite well with the escalation of current events. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|