Ban On Gay Marriage Struck Down

olawd.

Still have yet to hear an argument not regarding religious morality. If you're going to argue on subjective morality (or other forms of), than you can validate any sort of hate/thought(s).

This is true, but do we not already have many laws in different parts of the country in which "morality" is leading argument?

Prostitution, Gambling, Prohibition are a couple of examples.

I'm not disagreeing with your statement but there is a set precedent to work against.

These are legal in some places yet illegal in others, it would seem that the "morality" of each would be the argument against them being legal in all places.

Personally I don't really care either way. I'm not gay so the ruling doesn't affect my personal choices.

I am in favor of each state being able to set its own rules regarding the subject and the fed staying out of it. Put it to the people of each state to decide what they determine as moral.

NB4 (Majority limiting the rights of the minority and its the feds job to protect it etc). I know that my thoughts would have some holes to work out along with some disagreements on rights themselves, but its just my opinion.

True, but a majority nonetheless. The president is usually chosen by a closer percentage, and that has far more implications on a much wider array of subjects.

Well something being illegal and saying it's wrong due to that is just circular logic. Aside from that, just because we have laws against things, does not make them correct. Shitting on peoples civil rights because we don't personally feel something is ok, doesn't mean it's not ok. We've done that for years and had to (still are) embarrassingly fight(ing) for civil rights. If we're going to make it illegal, I want a reason. I've never heard one worth entertaining.

I want to see an argument for why gay marriage is wrong to begin with. Why should it be illegal?

Shut it, me and serj tickle each other at night! you jelous hoe?!

Throughout history, marriage has been the recognized ceremony by which humanity distinguishes a difference in child/family raising between the civility of humans, and the indifferent base instincts of animals. As humans are mammals, and reproduce exclusively heterosexually - marriage to that effect is solely recognized to be pure domain of a union of a man with a women... and nothing else.

Note: there is no modern religious perpective related to the above statement, the event of "marriage" was well before most modern religions, and ceremonialized afterwards by respective religions.

I have a very simple view on homosexuality -
1) Its your life do what you want, just do it in your privacy of your own home (just as much I sure dont want to see heterosexual promiscuity out in the open).
2) Nature (life) at its most basic level follows two simple rules for the maintenance of life:
-----> Survival of the fittest.
-----> Reproduction.
3) Homosexuality is contrary to these two base rules of nature, and is such contrary to nature. However since when do humans respect nature? As a homosexual, do you want - just don't kid your self your normal in respect to nature; after all you and your same sex partner will NEVER jointly reproduce.

^^^^^^^^^ THIS.

Minus the not reproducing because I already have.

My faith in humanity is dwindling due to this thread.

It hadn't already?

I was being rather optimistic :(

Some people are able to express themselves clearly and understand the realities of life, and others are incapable of expressing themselves and live from moment to moment. The truth is painful but you will accept the reality soon enough.. you're mortal just like I am.

Oh, by the way, here's a few more normal things in nature according to your logic:



and countless other "normal" things that can be found on youtube.... my point beyond these unfortunate youtube references: nature too has it abnormalities, and referring to them doesnt make it normal for humanity.

And on a lighter note, here's another:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdz9n2_freaks-of-nature_fun

Enjoy your lifestyle of choice!

You're a *** bigot.

Cut yourself til you bleed out and die.

Lol

You know what goes against nature? Doing something you dont like.
*** sake grow a brain. They cant help liking the same sex as they jts just like you liking a specific color over the other.

What would be unnatural is forcing yourself to do something you dislike. It doesnt make it right. Let them live and be happy you bitter *** get yourself a life.

I really don't see the argument in what you stated. Marriage, isn't about shitting out kids. Even if that was the case, why could a gay couple not raise an adopted child? Also why does the way in which something was done in the past, make it absolutely the correct and only way to do it in the future?

At the current population rate, we're ***, so perhaps we should make straight marriage illegal and gay marriage legal so we can do some population control. Maybe it's natures way of evening us out.

Reproduction is not a necessity of marriage and vice versa.

This.

This^^


So...by your logic we should treat animals born with deformities like lesser beings of their kind. They should get ***treatment compared to the "normal" animals.

So...by your logic we should treat animals born with deformities like lesser beings of their kind. They should get ***treatment compared to the "normal" animals.

So...by your logic we should treat animals born with deformities like lesser beings of their kind. They should get ***treatment compared to the "normal" animals.

So...by your logic we should treat animals born with deformities like lesser beings of their kind. They should get ***treatment compared to the "normal" animals.

Edit: Although I wouldn't compare a homosexual to an animal, or say they had a deformity >_>;

you two are the dumbest person. ):

you are the dumbest person.
Look, I have nothing against homosexuality, but saying "herp derp it's natural" is ridiculous. Did you know there is a mental disorder that fools you into thinking you would be better off without one or all of your limbs? Sorry I forget the name of it, but yeah. People will amputate themselves to get rid of it because they believe they will be happier without their limb(s). Sorry to take it to extremes, but just because you think something doesn't mean it's natural.