Random Politics & Religion #22

Well that's just silly. Anyone who has ever looked at a political chart knows they're on the left.

Well that's just silly. Anyone who has ever looked at a political chart knows they're on the left.

Some did, and those are the people the media targets in their "stories." That way, they can portray the "typical Trump voter" to be <insert derogatory/deplorable term>. Most people who voted for Trump don't give a ***about some of the things he did (in his private life) or what he posts on Twitter (pre- and post-election).

"not caring" is basically tacit approval in that it was not detrimental to him.

No it isn't. Unless you want to apply the same standard to everyone for everything every president did or didn't do throughout history.

For the purpose of this specific argument

He got the votes of those people whether they actually cared about what he did or not. That's all I'm saying.

His bromance with Putin.

I wonder if the team vs. team political structure is so ingrained in sociology that it is impossible to overcome.

You're just dead set on bashing other presidents.

I'm talking about Trump-specific things in relation to this one poll and why his numbers predictably wouldn't go down if there was another election between those two candidates today.

No president is perfect and they've nearly all had significant flaws and missteps by them and their cabinet.

I'm talking about the logical reasons for the results of the poll Rav cited and why it felt fairly obvious to me.

Look, I get it, you are on the bandwagon on bashing Trump. You don't need to focus so much on it though, it makes you look petty and desperate.

Fine. Just don't hold Trump to that standard and ignore everything else.

...?

What are you even talking about?

I said that his actions that he committed that would have traditionally torpedoed a candidate were either supported by or ignored by the people who voted for him, and that didn't change.

Then I ripped Hillary for being a big phony.

I said that his actions that he committed that would have traditionally torpedoed a candidate were either supported by or ignored by the people who voted for him, and that didn't change.

Why not call his voters deplorable then. Worked for Clinton, didn't it?

You seem to be attacking Trump and his voters. That's really going to get another liberal/democrat in power, isn't it?

(Newser) – Michael Flynn's Russia headache just got worse: The two heads of the House Oversight Committee say the erstwhile national security adviser probably broke the law in regard to his foreign business dealings, reports the Washington Post. GOP Rep. Jason Chaffetz and Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings say they reviewed classified military documents and found that Flynn never received the proper permission to accept payments for a speech in Russia and for lobbying on behalf of Turkey. That means Flynn could face criminal prosecution and may have to surrender any money received, reports the AP.

"As a former military officer, you simply cannot take money from Russia, Turkey, or anybody else," said Chaffetz of the former general, per the New York Times. “"And it appears as if he did take that money. It was inappropriate, and there are repercussions for a violation of law." Added Cummings: "He was supposed to get permission, he was supposed to report it, and he didn’t." The White House has denied the panel's request for more documents related to Flynn's hiring and subsequent departure, reports the Hill. Flynn resigned in February over phone calls he made to the Russian ambassador before assuming office.

Fone and Niko's worst nightmare. Feminist Whiskey with a taste of Hillary.

All it needs is bill Clinton branded Cuban cigars

Let me guess it tastes like liberal tears ?

We are talking about how we don't know what we are talking about !

Liberal Tears is for cleaning your guns, wouldn't recommend drinking it.

Because nothing is better for metal than saltwater!

I HAVE EMPATHY FOR THIS STATEMENT

Sorry it was a gun oil:

http://liberaltears.net/