Titanfoo said: »
I don't think anyone is asking to banish the second amendment, just maybe not sell automatic rifles so easily.
Then after it's poitned out automatic weapons were functionally banned decades ago he changes tactics, again without actual knowledge and trying to play the high ground.
Titanfoo said: »
point is that it wasn't hard for the Orlando guy to obtain guns legally even after being on the FBI list twice, something is wrong here.
Again I point out where he's severely misinformed.
Now anyone seeking rational discussion would take a huge step back and reassess their position as that position is obviously based on misinformation. Does he do this? Nope doubles down and continues, now attempting emotional manipulation.
Titanfoo said: »
semi automatics that killed 50 people, if your answer is simply a moment of silence I don't know what to say. I'm not going to argue this. I simply believe measures could be taken to decrease the amount of mass-murder in the US.
I don't want to take anyone's guns away, I just want to prevent mass-murderer's from obtaining them easily.
I don't want to take anyone's guns away, I just want to prevent mass-murderer's from obtaining them easily.
Then attempts group shaming and bullying tactics
Titanfoo said: »
you are paranoid, lol
I point out that the progressive leaders in the USA have openly stated support for mass disbarment and full bans.
He now continues shaming tactics and an attempt to paint me as the bad guy even though he's demonstrated ignorance and misinformation several times now.
Titanfoo said: »
that quote "we don't want to disarm you" came from who? not me. Try to make it clear who your quoting please, again; not trying to argue, trying to find solutions to mass murder of innocent people. I don't really care about people's gun collections. it adds up to nothing to 1 innocent human life.
some people can actually hold conversations on this topic in a civil manor.
/sigh
some people can actually hold conversations on this topic in a civil manor.
/sigh
And it continues from there, very amateurish trolling attempt.
This person doesn't desire a rational conversation, he desires to emotionally manipulate the 3rd party observer into agreeing with his agenda. That agenda being "We need to put even more restrictions then already exist to effectively ban guns". He (or she) doesn't own a firearm nor has ever purchased one for him(her) self. Doing so would of demonstrated the already large amount of paperwork required.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
You can 3d print a gun you know...
Wouldn't matter, they are trying to use a tragedy caused by a Muslim terrorist as a political soap box to push banning and confiscation.